Tried contacting Shanksville sources, no dice

Yeah...it there was proof, it would have been posted eight gazillion times by now. Instead, all we get is shills taking turns dancing and dodging. All to the reader's benefit in the long run though.

93? NO PROOF. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. Even the most seasoned shills have none to present anyone with. When focused on that fact too much, the propaganda of lies, insults, and badgering comes fast and furious, via the "official BS story" tag teamers.

 

Yup, if you like parrots that can only say 3 words.

 

The evidence for 93 is overwhelming. Only those who refuse to open their eyes are blind.

That's unbiased veracity right there.

 

This alleged "grotesque blogger."

How is challenging the claims you made a "set up question"? Do you not stand by your claims anymore?

Why can't you be a man and give a "yes or no" instead of continuing to dodge my question like a coward would?

 

Oh, so you won't do are work, but we have to do your work. Got it.

Well I don't want to be linking to "grotesque blogger" sites now, do I?

PS - Do you think Hannibal was telling the truth when he says he has photos and video from 9/11 Shanks volunteers that supposedly prove most of 93 buried? yes or no

 

I've answered your 'question' several times. Don't get all pouty if you don't like (or can't understand) my answer.

I stand behind every claim I've made.

What do you disagree with that I've claimed about the 'alleged' blogger?

 

I know I wouldn't. You never know what it's posted on there.

(oh, you seem to have mistaken 'our' for 'are'. You're welcome)

 

You answered like a coward by dodging a yes or no answer. Why can't you answer it like a man?

When are you going to prove these claims?

What are the claims against this blogger that makes them "grotesque" in your eyes?

 

Thanks, grammar nazi.

 

The blogger is irrelevant to this thread. Start a thread about him if you're so very curious.

You have my answer. Insults won't help you understand it better.

You really need to focus on the topic, rather than trying to turn everything around at me.

Good luck with your truthseeking.

 

Overwhelming? Don't you have to see some evidence first before you can proclaim it "overwhelming"? Best I can tell, you boys have produced NOTHING.
Open eyes in akin to actually "seeing something". We've "seen" nothing. My eyes are wide open, and I've seen nada.

Your statement of "the evidence is overwhelming" is a bold faced lie, my friend.

 

Here, I'll remind you again. Can you rebut:

Evidence Summary: 10 Points

1) The four hijackers purchased tickets under their own names and boarded the plane. One was randomly selected for and passed additional security screening. Ziad Jarrah was a licensed pilot and had recent training on professional large jet flight simulators. United flight 93 was scheduled to depart at 8:00 am, but left 42 minutes late due to airport traffic. Aboard were 33 passengers, 7 crew members, and 4 hijackers.

2) Several passengers and crew called from the plane, spoke with loved ones, described the hijackers' attack, and related their plan to try to retake the plane so that it would not be used as a suicide weapon against a populated area. All but two of these calls were made using the plane's seatback Airfones.

3) The cockpit voice recorder recorded the hijackers' attack and apparent murder of the pilots and a flight attendant. Air traffic controllers heard a radio transmission by a man with an Arabic accent, warning of a bomb on board. Passengers reported that one of the hijackers had what appeared to be a bomb strapped to him.

4) After learning about the other attacks, passengers and cabin crew attempted to retake the cockpit but were apparently unable to gain entry. The sound of their attempts was recorded on the CVR. The CVR also recorded the hijackers' decision to end the flight, followed by repeated shouts of "Allahu Akbar!" ("God is greatest.") until the plane crashed. Families of victims heard the CVR recording.

5) Flight 93 was tracked by radar until it went down.

6) Many people in Pennsylvania saw the Boeing 757, traveling at low altitude and high speed, roll to the right and plummet upside-down, nose first, towards the ground. Many people witnessed the subsequent enormous explosion and fireball. Val McClatchey photographed the mushroom cloud.

7) Hundreds of first responders (mostly volunteer firefighters) and crime scene investigators were quickly on the scene. They saw human remains, aircraft wreckage, personal effects, jet fuel, etc.
The cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder were recovered and had usable data, all of which is consistent with the other evidence.

8 The remains of every victim was positively identified. Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller personally collected many remains and made 12 identifications through fingerprints and dental records. Personal effects of most passengers and crew were recovered and returned to their families.

9) Hijacker identification documents and personal effects were recovered, along with the remains of four people identified as the hijackers through the process of elimination.

10) Nearly all of the aircraft was recovered by professional investigators and by civilians. The debris was returned to United Airlines after being examined for evidence of explosives u

 

Ten points; Hannibal.

I'll add in 2 myself.

11). No credible witnesses report seeing a fighter jet or a missile being fired
12). Suede even admits the witnesses saw the plane nosediving but not sone saw any sort of recovery. Yet he claims the plane didn't crash there and that the wreckage was staged.

 

Already been rebuked in an earlier post as nonsense.

 

Hand waved perhaps, but never refuted. Remember? Your 'evidence' was 'too good' to be shared with the likes of 'us'.

 

Alright...I'll give you evidence in the manner you suggest as being evidence. You ready?
I talked to first responders, employees of the WTC's, and police on scene. Their accounting of the events of the day are quite different than what the "official" BS story pretends.

 

Great. Provide their contact info (as I did for the witnesses in Shanksville) and I will ask them directly.

 

You (*)(*)(*)(*) well know there are plenty of witnesses, and you know how to access them and their statements if you really wanted to. You don't.

 

Why waste your time?
Hannibal is obviously a lying crank or he would fess up the evidence he claims to have.

 

There ya go.

 

Provide the contact info (as I did for Shanksville) for your witnesses and I will contact them directly.

Or continue to dodge. Your choice.

 

Provide proof of what you represent or admit it is invalid.

Or continue your "official" BS for yet another year (or five).

 

Once again, you cannot back up your claims.

 

Once again, I refuse to do your dance.

 

I provided links and sources. You cannot even manage that?

Didn't think so.