Tried contacting Shanksville sources, no dice

We've been over this ground before. Your goal is your "official" agenda; has been for at least five years across at least several forums. Disinformation...plain and simple. Jump through your own hoops.

 

Let it be noted that once again, a 'truther' fails to source his claim.

Surprised? Nope.

 

Five plus years of posting everywhere and that's all you can come up with?

 

You are the one trying to evade sourcing your claim.

You are attempting (once again) to make the thread about me.

Source your claim. (ie: Put up or shut up.)

 

Ahh..the old circular "it's all about me" drill.

 

No, it's the 'RtWngaFraud tries to distract attention away from his lack of evidence' drill.

It's the only drill you seem to have.

I'm asking for sources, you are dancing and dodging in order to avoid posting them.

 

Ill make a deal with you Sparky..you post conclusive evidence the 93 was buried, in any percentage, or admit it wasn't, and I'll play your little game in return. Now's your chance...Serve it up or choose A, B, C ,or D.

 

I posted my sources. You fail to post any of yours, and try to change the subject to make it about me. Still you dance and dodge to avoid having to face up to the fact that you can't support your claim.

Don't be upset, it's completely expected.

 

You posted NOTHING.


Don't be upset though, it is expected of you as well, and there ISN'T ANY anyway, so, I quite understand, as does everyone else. You can't post what doesn't exist.

 

Oh yes, I posted direct contact info.

The 'truthers' fail to follow up on it.

Still you dance and dodge to avoid having to face up to the fact that you can't support your claim.

 

You stated:

Cite them. Give us a contact. Let everyone have access to the same info you do.

 

Flight 93...buried...you first.

 

Dodge noted.

Show us a source for this claim, as I did for the Shanksville topic:

In your own words, put up or shut up.

 

The "Shanksville topic" as you put it, consisted of nothing but unresponsive email addresses as I recall, along with your claim that you were onsite, helping with the operation, and chatting with folks there. Was that inaccurate?

 

Nope. Direct emails, phone numbers and addresses. My sources.

The topic at hand is the claim that :

You continue to avoid showing your source.

Put up or shut up.

 

Nah...tonight, I am finding it more entertaining to highlight your evasive hypocrisy.

 

Dodge noted.

So you are simply here to troll? You make many claims you can't support. Who are you working for? Were you hired by Bush to make the 'truthers' look silly?

Show everyone your source. Or continue to dodge. Your choice.

 

Darn! "Dodge noted" was the other one. I missed that one. Thanks for the reminder.

I'm here to post what I know conflicts with the "official" BS story, address it briefly, and let the reader dig further for themselves. It "sticks" better when one finds the specific answers for themselves. Otherwise, short term memory discards it almost immediately.

The people that want to see what the truth is, can look easily enough. I'm just here to nudge them in the right direction. You're here to block all avenues to truth. Hence, all the mud in the water.

 

Wouldn't it be easier to just cite your source? Makkade insisted on that, in another thread.

It seems you just make things up, then shrug of any responsibility for the claims you make.

Show everyone your source. Or continue to dodge. Your choice.

 

I think the needle is stuck on the broken record.

 

Yes, you keep dodging.

Cite your source.

 

No USDA source. No Flight 93 buried either.

 

The Dept. of Agriculture has nothing to do with 9/11, unless you count the fertilizer that 'truthers' shovel.

Thanks for admitting that you have no source.

 

That's correct. I have no source you would accept that conflicts with the "official" BS story". Now what?

 

Now nothing.
You offer no conflicting evidence to the accepted narrative, so it remains accepted.