'True lies of new Atheism'.

This is bull(*)(*)(*)(*). I enjoy experiences over materialistic objects.

 

Why? That statement is completely false BTW.

Exactly what are you calling IB? Be careful you are very close to being reported. I know why you are upset but that does not give you the right to insult.

No you were the first to use the microscope example. Please try to man up and stop slandering my words. If you can not defend your simple statements you sure will not be able to defend the topic of the OP.

Ha, ha If I were you I would stop with the insults if you want to hang around. I am sure you CAN NOT even answer the rebuttals to YOUR ON statements.

I am saying

(1) You and anyone alive has a world view ie A way they define the world that they live in including their beliefs OR NON BELIEFS.

(2) Atheists have a burden of proof just like everyone else does to defend thier claims, if the say they do not they are being dishonest.

If you continue to insult and attempt to belittle myself and others in this forum YOU WILL BE REPORTED. I am tired of trolls trying to derail a thread when they determine they can not defend a word they are saying.

Rev A

 

You do not even understand what IC said! This is getting to be funny. Good I need a good laugh.

Rev A

 

I wasn't responding to you.

Why are you have a hoopla over it?

 

Anarchists do not believe that anyone rules over them. However, you have a ruler. You are a discipline, not an anarchist. Lets get this straight.


Plus, I never insulted you. Stop being so sensitive. I thought we were having a conversation before you threatened me. I just asked you to stop being so demanding over the facts and you throw a fit and think that I was "insulting you".

Is simple discussion out of your league? (that is an insult)?

 

Well thank you for that admission. By declaring that you "enjoy experiences over materialistic objects", that enjoyment of or over materialistic objects is a part of your 'world view'. Do you also enjoy the spiritual objects and entities?

 

I enjoyed Casper the Ghost as a kid and the Ghostbusters.

 

I was talking to IC but, and I say this in hopes that you tone down your rhetoric, if you slow down and actually read what others write you may find that we are trying to have a productive discussion not a peeing contest. You are welcome here if you calm down.

RevA

 

I have no idea who IC is. I am sorry to upset your parade.

When you are done having your parade, I will be here, in the flesh.

 

I am an a near absolutist when it comes to my world view (google it, basically it means my morals etc come from the bible and God) , lets get the terms correct and that is a start. I explained this in my introduction and several times. If you would have asked I would told you what my screen name means! It means that I go by Gods rules not mans. If mans laws clash with Gods I will disobey mans laws (hence be an Anarchrist) and follow Gods laws. So Rev (because I am a real pastor) Ancharist..

Well if would you feel comfortable going into a bar and asking a hells angel what he was babbling about? You intentionally chose that word. That is only one insult but you get the pic I hope. Additionally If I said your mom sister etc was very good in some sexual situations you would be offended (or 99% of us would). Why? Its because you love your mom sis etc. When you insult God or the beliefs of a Christian you are insulting something I love MORE than mom dad my dog or my Harley. See what I mean?

Do you get into a lot of fights in school and with your GF? I threateneed you so I would not have to report you. I was doing you a favor.

No its the way you said it (see above).

No not at all, however I would rather not be insulted while discussing something because the discussion turns into a peeing contest and a cuss fight with nothing being resolved.

RevA

 

I don't remember Christ being so haughty.

 

It means Incorporeal sorry I forget you are new in this thread.

You are here only virtually.

Rev A

 

I am not Jesus I am a sinner saved by his unselfish grace.

Rev A

 

I am here in the flesh talking to you.

 

No on this end you are a type on a moniter. On your end you may be in the flesh, however these days you might be a computer. BTW are you a male or female, and your age please, tho I could get close by guessing~

Rev A

 

Then why are you tempted to take an authorative stance and rat on me for some stupid (*)(*)(*)(*)?

Seriously, your antics are getting old. You are either a messenger of Christ or you are not. Which are you?

 

I am a person who you are talking to who Jesus is supposedly to "save". Why do you mitigate this experience?

 

Because I do not want to talk to someone that chooses not to talk like friends.

My antics eh? Christians i.e. the church is called the body of Christ. We are Gods hands eyes and we speak for God. Unfortunately we are human and we do make mistakes. So ergo I am a sinner saved by the grace of Jesus. He died so we would not have to live by the 610 old laws of Moses and instead live by or try to live by the ten laws left over and if we screw up we are saved when we ask for forgiveness and repent.

I am working on it beleive it or not.

Rev A

 

That "whole sinner I am a mistake" ideal is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

I don't want to talk to anymore. I rather talk to someone that can learn from their mistakes rather than using God as a cop out.

 

I am. I have been able refute every claim of a god with logic. I see people struggling to get their argument off the ground all the time.

You saying it doesn't make it true. I don't care if you want to redefine logic or not, but don't expect Merriam-Webster to add your definition of logic to the list anytime soon.

God is a "space"? I'm really not sure where you are going with this one.

No, but polytheism is not necessarily the most prevalent religion in the world. People don't try to defend that one anymore. That is why I picked it. Do you actually believe in Zeus?

Also, you should keep attacking my typos, they are the only mistakes you will find in my posts. It gives you a chance to be right for a minute.

No. Why would you be impressed? That just seems silly.

The story of whatever religion you choose to subscribe to.

Logic is logic. You are illogically try to escape that fact.

It's the same logic I applied to god to make god disappear in a puff of smoke.

I don't really recommend it for everyone though. Some people just can't handle the truth. For those people, religion has made them a better person. An example of those people are the ones who think there is no reason to keep yourself from raping and pillaging without religion.

Of course, then there are people who rape and pillage in the name of religion.

I suppose it's all relative. There is one constant, though; a complete lack of evidence to support any religious belief that has ever been had.

 

That is a pretty bold positive claim. Now where is the proof of that claim. As far as I am concerned, all you have offered is your personal opinion based on your philosophy of choice and that PROVES NOTHING. So lay it out for all of us, by listing all, individually, every refutation that you have successfully accomplished. Until then, the remainder of your comments from that posting of yours means nothing.

 

It's not my fault that you believe in a fairy tale.

Do your own homework.

 

If I were to accept your claims as being true, then I could be righteously referred to as one who believes in 'fairy tales'. So until you live up to the obligation of proving your claims, then your so-called claims are nothing more than 'fairy tales' at the least and outright lies at the most.

 

Don't forget that you made the first outrageous claim. my claim is just a response to yours.

By your logic, you are obligated to prove your claim.

 

Read this carefully.

1: What 'outrageous claim'?

2: The requirement for a 'proof of claim' is a product of that form of logic which you use... it is not a product of the logic I use. When I throw that little piece into a discussion, it is just to rub a little mud in the faces of those who make a ritualistic use of such a perverted logic.