Trump and Putin joke together about Russian interference in US elections.

Meh, Mueller, no collusion or conspiracy. You are apparently not aware of what went on under the Obama regime that has been coming out about the 'stolen dirt' but I forgive you since you keep yourself unaware due to confirmation bias.

 

Of course, that's not what happened, but carry on, my friend.

How you can equate a campaign retaining an American company for normal opposition research with a foreign government interfering in our election is mind-blowing; it requires such mental gymnastics, it's gotta really louse up the normal workings of neural pathways.

 

And, there you have it, folks.

Hiring an American company to perform perfectly normal opposition research? Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad!!!!

Colluding with a hostile foreign government to win an election? Eh, c'mon! TDS!

 

so you didn't read the report. I get it, that takes time, effort and decent reading/comprehension skills and would totally destroy the trumpian narrative. The certitude of ignorance is much preferred by some.

It seems you are unaware that the bullshit that is coming out about "stolen dirt" under the Obama regime is exactly that - bullshit.

as for confirmation bias, nice projection.

 

You evidently didn't. Innuendo is not evidence but that is a distinction the left does not understand. No indictment is exoneration, another distinction the left does not understand. TDS is something the left suffers from so clouds their rational thinking.

 

Just remember folks.

False equivalency is a great way to deflect from the obvious, especially when liberally salted with wild arsed conspiracy theories.

You have to remember that the rules don't apply to Trumpians the same way the do for everyone else.

 

Where is the "innuendo" in the Mueller Report?

Since when is not being indicted the same as a magical fairy-dust "exoneration"?

These are interesting theories that we should discuss!

 

Christopher Steele was a foreign spy. And the DNC hired him to dig up dirt on Trump. Those are facts, my dude.

There is no proof that Russia "interfered" in US elections any more than Israel or Saudi Arabia or the UK did.

 

So basically you are claiming the dossier of Russian information paid for by the DNC and Hillary does not exist. Fascinating.

 

"Liberally salted"?

That's being gracious.

They've buried salt licks in those claims.

 

Gosh, I thought you said you read it. Maybe it is a reading comprehension issue.

 

Name one thing I said that wasn't true.

Oh right... you can't.

Because the DNC hired Christopher Steele, a foreign spy, to go around Europe and Russia digging up dirt on Trump.

But I always forget that Democrats are allowed to do whatever they want to win. They're special and don't have to follow the same rules as everyone else.

 

Me and the FBI

Although the G-men were prevented from examining them

 

Christopher Steel isn't an American. He's a foreign spy who was hired by the DNC to dig up dirt on Trump.

Can you show me the legal designation of "hostile foreign government" in US law? Or is that just your personal opinion?

Yeah, it's your personal opinion.

By the way, the Mueller investigation never indicted a single person for "collusion". Your asinine conspiracy theory crashed and burned. Stop embarrassing yourselves and move on already.

 

You're the ones pushing an outlandish conspiracy theory. And after years of investigating by the big-shot Mueller, not a single indictment related to "collusion" with Russia. Oops. You're conspiracy theory turned out to be a big fat lie. But you will never accept that. You'll be on your death bed moaning about Russian "collusion".

 

You were assuming that the DNC would follow in the footsteps of hillary herself when she actually took hammers to devices that the FBI wanted to see

 

And you are assuming you actually know something you obviously don't. Hence moving the goal posts from the DNC to hillary.

Its not like its totally obvious or anything.

 

I am not surprised you find your own stupid strawman to be fascinating.

I've known for some time that nuance and contextual differentiation were steps to far for most trumpettes, but it never ceases to amaze me when I see it in action.

 

Translation: You call the facts 'strawman' to deflect.

 

I see you can't grasp the concept of false equivalency.

The DNC did not hire Christopher Steele. They hired Fusion GPS, (the dnc and fusion shared the same legal firm) who hired Christopher Steele.

I realize this is a real braintwister for you, but perhaps you can spot the difference between commissioning opposition research legally, and knowingly and eagerly entertaining foreign government assistance in the form of illegally obtained "dirt".

 

I read it. The whole enchilada.

Making my question to you an obvious one.

 

Well said.

 

Yes, so outlandish that it’s documented in the Mueller Report!

Read it. Do it overnight.

 

Translation: You don't know the difference between evidence and innuendo.

 

Its obvious you are caught like a fish on a hook