Trump and Putin joke together about Russian interference in US elections.

Discussion in 'United States' started by Nemesis, Jun 28, 2019.

  1. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,586
    Likes Received:
    9,097
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have read it, my disingenuous amigo. You claimed that it was magically loaded with “innuendo”, which was surprising to me, as I noted none, and I had thought it was plain as the orange hue of Bonespurs’ skin that you hadn’t even read it.

    Where did you see this seemingly nonexistent “innuendo”?
     
  2. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, sufferers of severe TDS would not recognize innuendo if it hit them in the face.
     
    Thought Criminal likes this.
  3. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The media in its usual attack Trump mode was egging him on to do as their hero Obama had done and tell Putin to stop interfering in our elections. Trump knows that tactic is a joke and he mocked their request in public which has set the left on fire. I love it and enjoy the outrage from people such as yourself. Great fun to watch you all throw another temper tantrum.
     
    Thought Criminal likes this.
  4. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IT'S AN OUTRAGE!
     
  5. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,586
    Likes Received:
    9,097
    Trophy Points:
    113
    *LOL* My career relies upon my acute sense of the differences.

    Where's the "innuendo" in the Mueller Report? Cite to it, or just surrender to me now.
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2019
  6. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,586
    Likes Received:
    9,097
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean the non-existent "innuendo" that you keep claiming is on the Mueller Report? The fake "innuendo" that you can't even come up with one freaking example of?

    I'm quite familiar with innuendo and nuance; you haven't even been introduced.
     
  7. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Translation: "I didn't read it but its all innuendo despite the evidence and the indictments and such."

    Classic denialism. Anything else you deny in the face of history and fact?
     
  8. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now that is some impressive projection. I notice you revert to it when its obvious you don't have a clue what you are talking about, but are adamant in your opinion.

    Impressive even if it is consistent behavior.
     
  9. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Blaming Obama for trump's arrogant ignorance, and then relishing in the reaction of those who can see what a truly pathetic president and human being he actually is.

    It seems schadenfreude is as major part of the trump delusion sufferer's emotional/intellectual make up.
     
  10. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    he projected in a last ditch attempt to defend the fact he hasn't got a clue what he is talking about.
     
  11. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Translation: It seems you are so unfamiliar with the concepts of logical fallacies, that you don't know that strawmen or any other fallacy can in fact be true, although usually few and far between.

    Simple understanding buttresses simple opinion.
     
  12. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Blaming Obama for trump's arrogant ignorance, and then relishing in the reaction of those who can see what a truly pathetic president and human being he actually is.

    But you do demonstrate that schadenfreude is as major part of the trump delusion sufferer's emotional/intellectual make up.
     
  13. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In one of them there far right wing memes that define and dictate trumpian political opinion? jus' guessin'.
     
  14. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Really? What indictments were there for conspiracy or obstruction?
     
  15. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pretty simple. No conspiracy or obstruction yet here you are, beating a dead horse.
     
    Thought Criminal likes this.
  16. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well yes, the wailing and gnashing of teeth and the uselessly screaming at the sky lefties since 2016 is pretty fun to watch.
     
    Thought Criminal likes this.
  17. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You totally misrepresent. In fact your insistence merely indicates you didnt bother to read it and you've totally drunk the koolaid.

    But by all means keep trying to resuscitate that dead horse of yours.
     
  18. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess you don't believe in karma.
     
  19. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hmm...

    Karma.

    I guess your side is immune.
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2019
  20. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one is. Or don't you understand that concept either?
     
  21. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Huh?
     
  22. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet....nothing.
     
  23. Jonsa

    Jonsa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    39,871
    Likes Received:
    11,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seems you aren't familiar with karma. According to the philosophy, we all generate karma (good and bad) by our words, actions and deeds.




    I see the fact that Mueller couldn't issue an indictment for obstruction is difficult for you to comprehend. And its in the first friggin' paragraph on the first page of the report you didn't read. Oh well.
     
  24. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually, he could since it was just opinion and not law. He could also say there was guilt and the DOJ should indict, or he could outline the exactly what Trump would be guilty of and not indict, like Starr did with Bill Clinton, but instead played politics for the useful idiots.
     
  25. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "When debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser"
     

Share This Page