Trump encourages adoption

I haven't seen anyone but you arguing that point...which is an asinine point...

 

Bwahahaha! That’s your “evidence” lmfao, that’s the absolute best you can come up with ??
So let me get this straight, your “evidence” consists of the following:
Some republicans are in favor of welfare reform.
Most pro lifers tend to be republican.
Therefore prolifers don’t care about children.

Hehehe... hold on I’m not done yet....

And then...since every single law ever written, to some degree, controls the actions of other people....

Ready? Here’s the best part....
Pro lifers don’t care about children, they JUST want to control women...
Oh that’s some comedy gold right there.
I mean that’s not even anecdotal “evidence “.
That right there is some kind of reality twisted into oblivion brain game anecdotal evidence at best.

My friend, you didn’t fail because I said so. You failed because you literally have no evidence whatsoever to backup your accusations that prolifers don’t care about children an just want to control women.
Now here’s a little tidbit of actual real world evidence to prove that you are wrong...

https://www.lifenews.com/2011/01/17/pro-life-people-care-for-women-and-children-after-birth-too/

 

OH MY GAWD! You dredged up www.LIEnews, a "Pro-Life" site shown to be lying so much it's a legend in lies about abortion ?! THAT's your "proof" ???


Sorry, that crap website is full of sickies and their rather ignorant ideas..


And YOU keep agreeing with me that banning abortion is trying to control women while you deny it does !!! !!!!

Here, you just said so again: ""And then...since every single law ever written, to some degree, controls the actions of other people....""""


Republican politicians , who are righties, have a long history of ""constantly wanting to cut funding to entities that aid CHILDREN like WIC, SNAP, Welfare, even healthy school lunches and public TV!""

Sorry if you have no knowledge of Republican history but it's true...

 

So in other words, you clicked the link, read the article, realized that I am correct and that your hateful and deceitful accusations against pro lifers are nothing but unsubstantiated slander.
Then you came back to the forums and said “I’m not gonna click on that site and get sickies”
Because you don’t want to know the truth, you’d rather wallow in your agenda driven dishonesty.
At least bowerbird was honest enough to admit that she clicked on the link and read the article.
Why don’t you ask her if she picked up any “sickies” while she was there. LOL.

 

Oh and I’m not done yet...
Let’s take this back a step...
Your claim to fame is that “pro lifers don’t care about THE CHILDREN AFTER THEY ARE BORN they JUST WANT TO CONTROL WOMEN.
I provided you with a link that talks about three of the major pro life organizations that provide resources and services to these women and their families AFTER THE CHILDREN ARE BORN.
You (supposedly) refused to click on that link because you’re afraid you might get some “sickies” LOL.
Now here’s the best part...
I also shared that very same link with your bestest pro choice friend, bowerbird.
Bowerbird was actually courageous enough to click on it and read the article.
She then replied to me, “how are they going to continue getting funding for these services?”
Hmmmm, I wonder what services bowerbird is referring to? Oh! I know! She is referring to the services that these pro life organizations are providing to these families AFTER THE CHILDREN ARE BORN!
Bowerbird has just inadvertently admitted that these pro life organizations actually do provide resources and services to these families AFTER THE CHILDREN ARE BORN!
Now you don’t want to doubt bowerbird, do you?
She’s your bestest pro choice buddy on this whole forum.
Now why in the world would pro life groups set up these organizations to provide resources such as parenting classes, counseling, job training and even housing for these families AFTER THE CHILDREN ARE BORN if they didn’t care about the children?
I’ve proven my point to you from every angle. I’ve even got your strongest colleague on these forums to inadvertently admit that these services are available even long after the children are born. I’m guessing you’re probably going to try to twist and turn this into some form of ridiculous nonsense to try to carry on with your agenda but I think everyone here knows the truth.

 

I do support adoption. Never said that I didn't. I support a woman's right to choose. Has nothing with me having an abortion.
Personally, I oppose abortion and it is not for me to pass judgment on the subject. Not my call, or yours.

 

had Andrea Yates of had an Abortion, her other children may be alive today.. never know, some people should not have or do not want more children

that said, I am all for more good people adopting children

 

Sure I found it. What do you think Trump was touting? He wants to "shoot someone in the street". What do you think this will evolve into?

 

Well by the standard presented unless you have had one...........
Why do you oppose abortion?

 

Scroll back and yes it was.

 

Even in the US, the worst poverty is concentrated in bubbles of blue democratic governance. How many examples would you like?

 

I’m guessing you’re probably going to try to twist and turn this into some form of ridiculous nonsense to try to carry on with your agenda...and you did...





You:"" but I think everyone here knows the truth." So you need the backup of speaking for others ….can't do it on your own?

 

Well, you better get those "do-gooders fired up because if the Republicans take away women's right to their own bodies and force them to gestate like cattle there will be MANY MANY more children for you to rescue and taxpayers to pay for …

Meanwhile,
Republican politicians , who are righties, have a long history of ""constantly wanting to cut funding to entities that aid CHILDREN like WIC, SNAP, Welfare, even healthy school lunches and public TV!""

Sorry if you have no knowledge of Republican history but it's true...even with your head in the sand , it's true....



Now, do tell me why there are children STILL in the system....and why some of these precious lives" are NEVER adopted and actually "age out" of the system????

 

Bluesguy said: ↑
That is the argument being made, if you haven't adopted any children then you cannot support adoption.""""



SHOW me the quote.

 

OK, doof, you win!!!! Trump did not say "shoot children".

He only ripped them from their parents, put them in cages, is using rubber bullets and tear gas against them, calls them murders and rapists trying to get here illegally, calls them criminals...


...but you are correct he didn't say "Shoot Children"


...so you can just stay smug in your illogical , erroneous belief that Trump is Jesus and loves the children and has respect for all life.......if that comforts you....

 

I don't know why. Maybe just the idea of it.

 

I think teargas and beanbags is what it will evolve into. Those throwing rocks and bottles will be treated like anyone else committing assault.

 

He didn't say "shoot anyone" Did you really fall for the "putting them in cages" thing? False images were posted and gullible people bought it. I suppose you think that children should be kept with adults in jail. What could go wrong?

Please post a quote where I said I think Trump is Jesus or even one where I say I like the guy. I can post articles on illegal aliens committing rape and murder. It must kill you that he is right!

 

I already did.

 

No, you didn't....

 

Yeah I did it's one of your earliest post I have no obligation to lead you to it again.

 

I certainly don’t need anyone’s help to prove that your accusations against pro lifers is nothing more than slanderous, hate filled lies.
The point I was making is that I’m happy to expose it here on this open forum so that everyone else can see your true character, or lack there of.

 

Ok fox, I’m gonna let you in on a little secret....are you ready?........now don’t tell anyone........shhhhhhh.......
Pro life activists are NOT republican politicians.
If republican politicians want to reform welfare, that has nothing to do with pro life activists.
If pro life activists go to the trouble of contacting their congressmen they’re going to use that time to discuss abortion, not welfare.
I’m sorry if you are completely ignorant to what the pro life ministries are actually all about. Maybe if you pulled your head out of the sand and clicked on the link I provided maybe you’d learn a thing or two. Don’t use the “sickies”, LOL, as a cheap excuse to avoid the truth...the truth will set you free.

 

Which means YOU can't find it ….because it doesn't exist....


Yes, when one claim something one should be able to back it up or it's a lie

 

Then you'd be off topic....Trump/Jesus is the topic, not me....



Now what accusations are lies...??? The ones that have to do with Trump and adoption..