Trump ended the rule blocking mentally ill people from getting guns.

People vote for the people who do that voting. But they are corrupted by big firms and lobby groups.

I already sourced that a fast majority want big restrictions in how to obtain assault rifles..... by the way

 

No that is the opinion of the U.S. Department of Justice as entered into the dismissal of charges against Distributed Defense who was charged with a ITAR violation that DOJ was forced to dismiss because of testimony by the military that semi-automatic firearms are not suitable for use as assault weapons.

You really need to do some deeper research if you wish to be taken seriously when discussing such matters as Assault Rifles / Weapons.

 

lll

Really please explain how these voters have been corrupted by big firms and lobby groups or are you referring to legislators and not voters?

Well when you don't fact check your sources, plan on getting skunked once in a while, because what you and your source doesn't understand there are already a number of restrictions and lengthy process's already required to obtain an Assault Weapon.

You need to file with the BATF, submit fingerprints, pass a background check and wait about 6 months while the BATF checks you out and decides if you can own one.

And you better have a very fat wallet when you go to pay for your assault weapon.

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/832518199

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/827848848

 

There are many beliefs that exist because a majority of people see fact as being derived from repetition of the collective, something Orwell had well observed at the end of WWII in his satirical writings that warned could be exploited by a powered elite. Show this image

and the majority of people, will have the Pavlovian response, Identifying it using the one of the interchangeable labels assault rifle, assault weapon and the more recent, NEWSPEAK label, a semi automatic. Yet, it, in fact, is a bolt action LANTAC.
Then too, the majority of Americans when asked what the 2A does, they would say it grants the right to own firearms.
And then there is a huge number of people that believe,
Antibiotics kill viruses,
Dropping a penny from a tall building can kill someone,
Jesus was born on December 25th,
That the Dark Side of the Moon never experiences sunlight,
Or any of the other misconceptions wildly held,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions

So, the ministry of MINITRU continually changes the definition of and interchangeably uses the demonizing terms assault rifle, assault weapon, military style rifle and semi auto which is accepted as denoting an evil class of firearms, while, most of the faithful can’t provide a definitive set of criteria the distinguished such a firearm from any other except by resemblance to the image of an AR15 or AK47 image profile commonly displayed by the mainstream media when using the labels. Then when pressed for a definition, in Orwellian DOUBLESpeak, simultaneously point to one of the mainstream NEWSpeak definitions and often deny there is an set of criteria the label ‘assault rifle’ was originally applied to and that was coined by the Germans to represent in WWII.
It is interesting how the themes in the book 1984 can be seen in the language the current liberal collectivism dogma and in the repetition of the mantras of the elite coached mantras of collective that become ‘fact’ for the faithful. (1984, an applicable good prophetic read)
Lies are truth,
Ignorance is strength (many GCAs here reinforce that idea).

In regard to the labels “assault rifle”, “assault weapon” and the conflation of the terms to “semi automatic”,

“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
― George Orwell, 1984

And, the collective voice grunts with agreement.

 

What? I thought you could get one easily at Walmart. Boy, have I been mislead.

 

I'm quite sure if one has the correct criminal connections, that is to say knows someone who smuggles dope, one could get a real Assault Rifle, without a background check, 4473 or any form of ID other than some Benjamin's, by meeting that person behind a Walmart.

And that is the true fallacy of gun control laws, restricting or banning firearms by law will always be circumvented by those who don't adhere to the rule of law.

The GCA's know this and when viewed critically exposes their true goal of disarming the law abiding, while leaving the criminal element of our society armed to the teeth.

 

That the military says semi-automatic firearms are not suitable for use as assault weapons, does mean that they are assault weapons. Them people simply want firearms that also have full auto.

 

I'm not going to explain how lobby groups operate and how they corrupt the people who vote in legislation. You aint paying me. You're just deflecting away what the fast majority of the people want.

You previously didn't even know I already posted my sources. So now it suddenly isn't fact checked. It's not as if you sourced and quoted something that debunks what I argue.

 

And without select fire which includes full auto, they are not Assault weapons.

Want to try again.

 

You're nitpicking away as if the US is ruled as a dictatorship. It's just laughable how you portrait how voting works in the US.

 

The fast majority eh?

It matters not, your source (Wiki) which is know for being incorrect, is incorrect in this case and neither Wiki nor you understand what the terms you are using mean.

"Significantly, the government expressly acknowledges that non-automatic firearms up to .50-caliber – including modern semi-auto sporting rifles such as the popular AR-15 and similar firearms – are not inherently military."

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...in-defense-distributed-lawsuit-300678872.html

 

Sure. That's your opinion, and my source says something else.
Want to try again?

 

How about you read back and find my source, or look it up yourself.

Spotting that it aint military. That's not disputing what is an assault rifle.

 

No that is the opinion of the DOJ.

Once again and this time try reading it.

"Significantly, the government expressly acknowledges that non-automatic firearms up to .50-caliber – including modern semi-auto sporting rifles such as the popular AR-15 and similar firearms – are not inherently military."

"Not only is this a First Amendment victory for free speech, it also is a devastating blow to the gun prohibition lobby," noted SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. "For years, anti-gunners have contended that modern semi-automatic sport-utility rifles are so-called 'weapons of war,' and with this settlement, the government has acknowledged they are nothing of the sort."

Therefore semi-automatic firearms are not Assault Weapons by the U.S. governments own admission.

 

No you explain what a fast majority is.

If it not suitable for military use it is not an assault weapon.

 

Again incorrect.

Assault Rifle

By U.S. Army definition, a selective-fire rifle chambered for a cartridge of intermediate power. If applied to any semi-automatic firearm regardless of its cosmetic similarity to a true assault rifle, the term is incorrect.

 

You clearly don't know what I'm talking about, and never saw my source, ... yet claim it's wrong with nothing to back it up and resort in personal attacks. Nice going.

That's your silly tiny opinion. Who cares

Your source doesn't debunk a thing.

 

I checked out your source it's incorrect.

Incorrect, it is the opinion of the U.S. government.

This kinda reminds me of a sniper attack, you are up there slinging out miss's and this is the response you end up receiving.



By the way you still haven't explained what a fast majority is, why is that?

 

A fast majority is a fast majority.

You only put up that semi automatic assault rifles wont do

My source says 2/3. That is a vast majority.

 

Nope I did not make that statement the U.S. government did.

Come on wake up, you have backed yourself into a corner with misconceptions of which you understand little about and are now drowning in your lack of knowledge.

 

I already responded to that quote.

 

Yet your are still incorrect on the core of the subject.

 

All you got is a source saying that the army doesn't want assault rifles who are semi.... but that aint the same as them saying those aint assault rifles. While the point remains that 3/4 of the people do want strict regulations on assault rifles, and with that... they do mean AK kind of weapons. That is the core of the subject. Not your nitpicking whining ways of "what exactly is an assault rifle".