"Trump extends nuclear deal"

https://nypost.com/2018/01/12/trump-...-nuclear-deal/

Now something is out of sync here, or someone is lying

The President tells us over and over again that the Iran deal is the worst deal in history, and that he is the greatest deal maker in history, so why is he again, either third or fourth time, endorsing the Iran deal?

 

Extends it for another 120 days.

Says its the last time.

So I guess we'll wait 120 days to see if he means it.

And it is a bad deal and its a moronic deal.

The only time I've ever seen liberals be pro-nuclear is when a Muslim terror nation is the one making the nukes.

****ing hilarious.

But then liberals cave on every single one of their beliefs when it comes to these savage Muslim nations.

Killing of gays? No problem, you're Muslim.

Slavery and racism? No problem, you're Muslim.

Religious extremism? No problem, you're Muslim.

Beating killing raping and all around treating of women and girls as property? No problem you're Muslim.

Pollution? No problem you're Muslim.

Animal abuse? No problem, you're Muslim.

Hey liberals, either stand by your convictions or sit the hell down and shut the hell up.

 

I loathe Trump, but is it possible he is continuing the Iran deal in order to not give the regime over there the ability to distract from the protests by refocusing everyone on how evil America is?

 

Let me see if I understand.

Trump says he's going to end the Iran deal.

Liberals cry and cry and scream at the sky some.

Trump extends the deal.

Liberals cry and cry and scream at the sky even more.

What is it liberals want, exactly?

 

He said it was the last time last time

It wasn't a great deal, but it was the the only deal, Iran agreed to put their nuclear program on hold for ten years, without the deal, they'd have nuclear capability in couple of years. Besides, if the US said no the other signees were still ready to sign on, meaning Iran would have plenty of trading partners and markets worldwide

And the rest of your post is pure radio rhetoric, doesn't deserve a reply

 

Yeah, just like NK doesn't have nukes thanks to us giving them cash to buy...nukes.

 

"Liberals" are crying and screaming because he is extending the deal? I do believe you are fabricating here, and not very well I might add

 

That has absolutely nothing to do with the topic, and it is even a really bad "whataboutism"

 

Possibly, but I doubt it, his tweeting on the protests have already been employed by the Iranians to supposedly demonstrate the protests are motivated by US interference to the general Iranian public, this would be a stretch

He endorsed it because it is the only deal and is doing what it intended to do

 

Are you really going to present such a stupid argument?

We give money to Iran to stop nuclear program = you say "That will work!"

We give money to NK to stop nuclear program = you say "That's not the topic!"

That has to be the most blatant example of bull**** I've ever seen.

 

Then re-read the OP.

What's he complaining about then?

 

Trump lying about his ability to be the greatest deal maker in history or lying about Iran being the worst deal in history.

Or both, probably.

 

Work on your formatting. Please. And your bigoted belief system while you're at it.

Also, still waiting for you to explain what happened to Trump's magically shrinking balls overnight.

 

This argument was echoed on CNN a few days ago, I believe. Or they effectively made the argument that the protests made it more likely that the Iran deal would survive, but I don't recall their reasoning.

 

Of course he did, he is a poser.

 

He's not making a deal with them.

That was Obama allowing Hezbollah to sell slaves and drugs to get that deal.

Bad deal by any metric.

Hows that deal workin out, by the way?

 

Iran has held up its end of the deal, according to Israel and the Trump administration. And it's been extended for several years while Iran has reduced their nuclear capability and elected, for multiple terms, the most moderate president in decades.

So pretty ****ing well.

 

LoL sure it is.

Oh, Iran has the most "moderate" president in decades eh?

The one who's government is intrinsically linked to the largest terrorism network on the planet?

The one throwing it's citizens in prisons and stomping on their faces?

At least Obama got lip service for allowing Hezbollah to traffic slaves and drugs openly.

 

Nothing you said negates my points. Nor would eliminating the Iran Deal make any of your grievances less likely to occur.

 

We didn't "give momey to Iran," we returned their money we had withheld with the prior sanctions, did you think America was going to keep another nation's money, I think there is a term for that

And N.Korea nuclear capability has nothing to do with Iran, apples and oranges, you need to get your facts straight

 

Interesting how you omitted the first part of his post which validates the deal

 

Since when does Trump compromises for "liberals"? If he extended the deal it's because there are less silly reasons, like Euro pressure and the fact that the deal is indeed a good one, no matter what Kushner and the zionists hammer Trump with.

 

Whatever they are told to scream about at the moment...

 

Must be working out pretty well since Trump has extended it 3 times.

 

Oh he's not. I'm just saying that if Trump sold a drug that cured cancer for $1, they would cry "racist" because the capsule was white.