Trump parading "victims of illegal immigrants"

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by MissingMayor, Jun 22, 2018.

  1. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What do you think "maximum employment" means. Perhaps I need to understand where you're coming from.
     
  2. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Can you ever stay on topic? And yes, the 60k number comes from the federal government. And it includes applications from those who crossed illegally.
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.
  3. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Maximum employment is where the workforce can't fill the jobs required by businesses.
     
  4. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They definitely do not care about the American families separated permanently by illegal aliens.
     
    roorooroo likes this.
  5. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ah. Well, you have it backwards, which explains what you wrote.

    Maximum employment definition
    Maximum employment is the level of employment rates where the type of employment is not in demand.
     
  6. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    it was your heroes Republicans Reagan who gave and Bush who offered blanket amnesty to illegals
     
  7. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I addressed the topic quite specifically in post # 59. A reply you ignored entirely. You're straying off topic. Angel mom's and dad's have nothing to do with asylum seekers. The organization does not oppose any form of legal immigration.
     
  8. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,691
    Likes Received:
    26,762
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This issue is rife with propaganda.

    The Fox News Propaganda Machine Is in High Gear Over Family Separation


    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/family-separation-fox-news-w521696
     
    MissingMayor likes this.
  9. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Not really. The remaining unemployed are there for multiple reasons. It can be considered structural (employees not matched geographically) or frictional (willful, etc). And of course you do have the jobs that the current workforce (US citizens) does not desire as you mention.

    In fact your definition would cry out for welcoming new immigrants.
     
  10. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes really.

    I can't grasp the logic you are using, but that is your choice.
     
  11. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I didn't ignore it. It was where you accused me of smearing the victims and suggested I shouldn't even be allowed to voice an opinion. I didn't think your post was worth a reply.

    The propaganda event by Trump tried to compare the Angel's plight to those of asylum seekers in a demeaning way.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2018
  12. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's my choice that you don't understand something?
     
  13. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, that would be you and your choice.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2018
  14. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And what happened as a result? The flood gates opened.

    Given we have the benefit of previous example to review, what do expect another amnesty will do?
     
  15. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You certainly inferred they were spewing propaganda. It was the "most disgusting and obvious propaganda" you'd ever seen. That was post # 2 ... Post # 1 "victims clearly being coached" that certainly butchers the victims integrity. I never suggested you had no right to voice an opinion, I questioned by what sacrifice and privilege you claim the right to declare the victims grievances are just propaganda. Time magazine is "parading" a child victim who of course isn't, but Angel parents are actors being "coached"? You wouldn't recognize propaganda if it bit you.
     
  16. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    The right wing used this as an excuse to criticize Democrats when they should vent their hate towards Republicans who were and remain responsible for the mess.
     
  17. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is a ridiculous claim MrTLegal. It has no basis in reality.

    Why would you even attempt to float it?
     
  18. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For the fourth or fifth time ...

    In 1986, Reagan reached an agreement with the Democratic congress: Reagan agreed to a one time amnesty for 3 million illegals in exchange for the Democrats sealing the Southern border.

    Reagan signed the amnesty bill, then the Democrats quietly went into hiding and did nothing about the border. The Democrats welched on the deal. They lied.

    Upon leaving office, Reagan said that was the single biggest mistake of his presidency. He was schnookered.

    Democrats are a dishonorable bunch.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2018
    PrincipleInvestment and Texan like this.
  19. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Trump was using them as propaganda, and they were clearly coached to use the "permanent separation" phrase. A couple even referred directly to the families seeking amnesty, although they only referred to them as "illegal".

    But that is 100% on Trump for using them that way.
     
  20. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why did they not SEEK ASYLUM in Mexico and save themselves a 1200 mile walk with a toddler in tow?
     
  21. Daggdag

    Daggdag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    15,668
    Likes Received:
    1,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Can't legally send them accross international lines without a parent or guardian either accompanying them or giving permission, and many of them don't have family besides their parent.
     
  22. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Many do. Some seek asylum in Canada.
     
  23. Texan

    Texan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,129
    Likes Received:
    4,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Parents dragging their kids illegally across borders with the help of abusive cartels should lose their rights as parents in this country. They can get their kids back in their own country. How many kids die of thirst wandering in the desert?
     
  24. LowKey

    LowKey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,517
    Likes Received:
    411
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I'm not sure what the problem is both sides are engaged in branding. This is more a marketing war than a policy debate anyway.
     
  25. Daggdag

    Daggdag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    15,668
    Likes Received:
    1,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And what of the people who DIDN"T enter the country illegal, and came here with their families seeking asylum who have been thrown in prison?
     

Share This Page