Trump supporters line up over 36 hours early for President's Orlando rally

The scheme concocted by Giustra and his cronies, including The Clinons to obtain and sell uranium to Russia began in 2005 and continued until Russia obtained America's uranium. The citizenship of the participants in this corrupt enterprise started by Giustra et al is irrelevant ditto Giustra's decision to cash in on Uranium One before the uranium was transferred out of the US. "CANADIANS" Brits and Americans have frequently served as agents of Russia. Surely you know that.

"The path to a Russian acquisition of American uranium deposits began in 2005 in Kazakhstan, where the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra orchestrated his first big uranium deal, with Mr. Clinton at his side.

The two men had flown aboard Mr. Giustra’s private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined with the authoritarian president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Mr. Clinton handed the Kazakh president a propaganda coup when he expressed support for Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid to head an international elections monitoring group, undercutting American foreign policy and criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, his wife, then a senator.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES, Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal, By Jo Becker and Mike McIntire, APRIL 23, 2015
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

 

So much for your FAKE claim that the NY Times is a Clinton friendly publication.
https://thinkprogress.org/steve-bannon-new-york-times-washington-post-clinton-cash-d59d6492546/
But last year, both the Post and Times partnered with Bannon’s Government Accountability Institute (GAI) to disseminate opposition research on Hillary Clinton published in Clinton Cash, a book by Breitbart contributor Peter Schweizer.

In April 2015, Politico reported that the “New York Times, The Washington Post and Fox News have made exclusive agreements with a conservative author for early access to his opposition research on Hillary Clinton, a move that has confounded members of the Clinton campaign and some reporters.”

As ThinkProgress detailed last year, Clinton Cash cited a fake press release and relied on circumstantial evidence to make a case that the Clinton State Department traded favors for donations to the Clinton Foundation and speaking fees for Bill Clinton. Other outlets highlighted a number of additional errors in the book ranging from Schweizer falsely inflating Bill Clinton’s speaking fees to overstating the power then-Secretary Hillary Clinton had to prevent Russia from buying a company with uranium mining operations in the United States. Margaret Sullivan, then the public editor of the Times, questioned her paper’s arrangement with GAI in a April 2015 blog post, writing that even though there was no financial arrangement with Schweizer, “I still don’t like the way it looked.”

 

Just an out and out GOP/Tramp scripted lie, and nobody knows that better than you.
As was pointed out to you many times Giustra SOLD UrAsia to Uranium One BEFORE the Russians ever had ANY stake in Uranium One. Giustra NEVER has had a stake in Uranium One and did not in any way profit from its sale to the Russians.

 

All this copy in a futile effort to deny the obvious documented fact that the NYT is pro-Clinton and anti-Trump. No wonder Trump's opposition has lost so much credibility with ordinary Americans.

 

LOL! Ed, The New York Times is not "scripted" by the GOP/Trump. Surely you know that.

““Should we be concerned? Absolutely,” said Michael McFaul, who served under Mrs. Clinton as the American ambassador to Russia but said he had been unaware of the Uranium One deal until asked about it. “Do we want Putin to have a monopoly on this?...
A Seat at the Table
The path to a Russian acquisition of American uranium deposits began in 2005 in Kazakhstan, where the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra orchestrated his first big uranium deal, with Mr. Clinton at his side.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES, Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal, By Jo Becker and Mike McIntire, APRIL 23, 2015
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Even the NYT knows that it is pointless to deny that The Clintons are crooked.
There is probably a lesson there for other Clinton fans.

 

Sure that's why the Times partnered with Bannon’s Government Accountability Institute (GAI) to disseminate opposition research on Hillary Clinton published in Clinton Cash, a book by Breitbart contributor Peter Schweizer.

 

Again you repeat the same discredited Conservative crap.
Russia was not involved at all with UrAsia's acquisition of uranium from Kazakhstan in 2005. And Clinton had even less involvement! Clinton and Giustra's involvement together was strictly for charity.

 

LOL! You really believe that the NYT is partnered with Bannon and Breitbart?
Ed, that is nonsense, and everyone knows it. The NYT investigated Schweizer's research and confirmed its accuracy and expanded on his investigation.

The Clintons are such notorious crooks that even the MSM has to occasionally report the inconvenient truth.

“The indictment, rare for a political campaign, was unsealed in Los Angeles charging David Rosen with four counts of filing false reports with the Federal Election Commission. The charges focus on an Aug. 12, 2000, dinner and concert supported by more than $1.1 million in "in-kind contributions" -- goods and services provided for free or below cost. The event was estimated to cost more than $1.2 million.
The FBI previously said in court papers that it had evidence the former first lady's campaign deliberately understated its fund-raising costs so it would have more money to spend on her campaign.”
WNBC/AP“WASHINGTON -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's former finance director has been indicted on charges of filing fictitious reports that misstated contributions for a Hollywood fund-raising gala for the senator, the Justice Department said Friday.”, Hillary Clinton's Former Campaign Finance Director Indicted, 1/7/2005.
http://www.wnbc.com/politics/4063107/detail.html

Do you think Bannon and Brietbart are also partnered up with WNBC and The Associated Press?

 

Ed, the NYT is not a "conservative" newspaper. The Left that still has one foot in the real world knows that The Clintons are very crooked.

"Bernstein is not the only person bringing up Watergate to describe Clinton. His partner-in-exposing-crime, Bob Woodward, is also fond of comparing Clinton to Nixon. Woodward, who appears often on Fox News shows to discuss Clinton’s recent travails—her appearance before the House Select Committee on Benghazi, controversial donations to the Clinton Foundation, the investigation into her use of a private email server as secretary of state, and her refusal to release transcripts of her Wall Street speeches—has on multiple occasions given into the temptation to talk about Watergate."
MOTHER JONES, Woodward and Bernstein Can’t Stop Comparing Hillary Clinton to Richard Nixon, BY PEMA LEVY, FEB. 15, 2016.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...-bernstein-cant-stop-comparing-clinton-nixon/

Do you think Mother Jones, Woodward and Bernstein have all gone "conservative" - like the NYT?

 

Unlike your phony claims from Clinton Cash, it is a proven fact.
In April 2015, Politico reported that the “New York Times, The Washington Post and Fox News have made exclusive agreements with a conservative author for early access to his opposition research on Hillary Clinton.
You just can't handle the truth because as soon as you accept the truth you will learn EVERYTHING YOU KNOW IS WRONG!

 

You know you can't rebut the unassailable fact quoted above, so you desperately try to divert.
Thank you.

 

Yes, Trump supporters are almost all very good people.
As opposed to the very dishonest people responsible for the Fake News MSM.

"The on-air statement, which is repeated in the online editor's note with only a bit more elaboration, is both transparent and ambiguous. Likewise, I have gotten answers to some questions and not others.

These were not just "mistakes," as NPR said on air; they were embarrassing mistakes. The initial error was by the reporter, Aarti Shahani, who did not seek comment from the individual identified in the story as the website's author. ***Three editors*** saw the piece and did not raise questions either."
NPR Issues Rare Retraction : NPR Ombudsman: Elizabeth Jensen, April 12, 2018. (*** mine)
https://www.npr.org/sections/ombudsman/2018/04/12/601650762/npr-issues-rare-retraction

 

LOL! The NYT, WP and Politico all report facts discovered by a political researcher and you smear them all as "conservative" sources partnered with Brietbart and Bannon?

That's just absurd, and it seriously undermines the credibility of your arguments. The NYT, WP and Politico are all pro-Clinton publications. Why do you deny the obvious truth that everyone knows.

 

What "unassailable fact"? Your assertion that the NYT is conservative newspaper working for Bannon and Brietbart? I am still half way convinced you are joking. Please say you are.

 

I made no such assertion, as you well know, but thank you for creating that Straw Man which confirms that you KNOW you are wrong.

 

Ed, this is some of what you posted: "Sure that's why the Times partnered with Bannon’s Government Accountability Institute (GAI)".

 

Might as well go mooch off some free food and drinks while waiting for coal jobs to come back.

 

"They just better not run out of complimentary 'Hail, Glorious Leader!' t-shirts!"​

 

What YOU actually posted.

So where exactly did I say that the Times is a "Conservative newspaper?"
Unlike your sources, the Times allows both sides to publish articles, the truth from the Left and the lies from the Right.

 

LOL! I cut and pasted that exact quote from the NYT. Do you know how that works?

You responded: "Again you repeat the same discredited Conservative crap." Ed
You also claimed that the pro-Clinton NYT, WP and Politico are "partnered" with Bannon and Breitbart. Your position is rather absurd.

 

None of them are pro-Clinton and they DID partner with Bannon and BrightFart for dirt on Clinton, the editor of the NY Times even admits it, which I had already posted, so you knew it already when you mindlessly parroted your crap again:

Margaret Sullivan, then the public editor of the Times, questioned her paper’s arrangement with GAI in a April 2015 blog post, writing that even though there was no financial arrangement with Schweizer, “I still don’t like the way it looked.”

 

nuff said...

 

Obviously you are unaware of Trump's many slanders of The Mexican people not to mention his slander of the judge just because of his Mexican heritage.

 

Keep trying because so far no one has provided any evidence that the Clinton's benefitted personally. That is totally a different scenario from the Trump foundation which has been shut down.

 

He hasn't made any actual effort. In fact he has put forth no actual plan for totally overall immigration reform and dealing with those already here. Well maybe I should take that back since he apparently has concluded that mistreating immigrant children would somehow deter illegal immigration.