Trump threatens Cohen

Taking away someone’s freedom is threatening their safety.

 

Nope.
You took a position and its up to you to prove it.
You don't need a single thing from me to prove your position, and so you question is irrelevant.

Your answer is that Trump is hinting at retaliatory legal action against a member of Cohen's family
Show this to be true.

 

You cannot prove to a rational, reasoned person that anything Trump said or tweeted in this regard is an actual threat to anyone.

 

I checked your link, and it said nothing whatsoever in terms what constituted a threat. Because last I checked, it is not possible for law enforcement to "threaten Cohen" by cautioning Cohen's family about their illegitimate revenue sources which are eligible for Prosecution.

 

I watched your video. And it is not possible for law enforcement to "threaten Cohen" by cautioning Cohen's family about their illegitimate revenue sources which are eligible for Prosecution.

Moreover, no matter how many stories you all come up with, the U.S. Senate is not going to let Trump get impeached. Trust me. And then, Trump surely won't resign.

 

I already have. Now defend your position by answering my question, or are you unable to do so?

 

No. You didn't.
Hint: If you have to ask someone a question to prove your point, you haven't - and probably cant - prove your point.

Quote the supposed threat and demonstrate how it is a threat.

 

I haven't taken a position other than neither you nor anyone else can support the claim that what Trump said was a threat to anyone.
You have gone a long way to prove this to be true.

Quote the supposed threat and demonstrate how it is a threat.

 

You demand an answer to a question then refuse to answer a question after you received an answer? Unsurprising. Here, I’ll pose it as a statement:

Tell us why Trump and Giuliani involved Cohen’s father in law in a case that doesn’t pertain to him.

 

You presented a position. I asked you a question relevant to same.
You have still not proven that position, and you do not need my answer to your question to to do so.

Quote the supposed threat and demonstrate how it is a threat.

 

I answered it and provided evidence. It's hardly my fault that you choose to reject it.

Tell us why Trump and Giuliani involved Cohen’s father in law in a case that doesn’t pertain to him.

 

Because I am kind and benevolent, I will allow you to cite your post, quote yourself, and demonstrate how what you said proves your position that Trump threatened Cohen's family in his tweets.

 

Re-read our conversation and you'll find your answer; I'm not going to continue wasting my time re-writing and spelling it out for you.

Tell us why Trump and Giuliani involved Cohen’s father in law in a case that doesn’t pertain to him.

 

I accept your concession of the point - you cannot prove your statement, and you know it.

 

No, you're continuously talking in circles and wasting my time here. The answers and evidence to your question have been posted and cited, but you continue your attempts of sealioning. Until you answer my question/statement, we're done here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

 

Delete

 

Your statements
-They're a threat of retaliatory legal action against a 3rd party (Cohen's family) that doesn't pertain directly to the Cohen case.
-My answer is that Trump is hinting at retaliatory legal action against a member of Cohen's family.
Neither of these statements have been demonstrated true.

Quote the supposed threat and demonstrate how it is a threat.

 

desperate and very dirty tactics??? Bringing up tangential family members to make their point is pretty low by any standards.

(mind you..."standards" , ethics, decency and tact have all left the building ..er White house DC )

 

What is really odd, and may be why Dirty Donald is so sure that Cohens father in law is a crook, is that he is believed to have been a silent partner of none other than Dirty Donald.The Fima Shusterman family moved to the USA from the Ukraine in 1975 and are now all Naturalized citizens.He is believed to have been a conduit directing Russians to Trump owned properties and encouraging them to buy.It was at Shuterman's behest that Dirty Donald hired his son in law Michael Cohen.Cohen has been married to his daughter since 1994,they have two adult children.Cohens brother Bryan is also married to a Ukrainian bride.

 

Speaking of family members.
Looks like the House will be going after the Kushner clearance again.
And Cohen will testify anyway.
This is Trump winning.
Nancy has Trump like this:

 

Lol...just stop. Obtuse is not a flattering look.

There is only a threat to Cohen's FIL's freedom if he is indeed involved in Organized Crime.

 

Cohen's father in law has been previously convicted of tax evasion.Something we know Dirty Donald and his familyhas done to the tune of tens of millions and has got away with it.But his day of reckoning may be approaching faster than he realizes.

 

Do any of these slimeballs pay taxes!?! Sheesh.

 

Just a thought. If Trump does know that Cohen's father in law is involved in criminal activity, is it not illegal to withhold that information?

 

Well, I'd like some clarification before we leap to conclusions.