All I'm asking is if Eisenhower could justify sending United States Army 101st Airborne troops against AMERICAN CITIZENS, why can't Trump send the United States Army to defend the United States against foreign invaders?! I want to hear just one (ONE) liberal 'expert' on the federal law explain this.... He could use Federal troops in the U. S., . But he can't?!
Sorry but I do not understand the present crop of Democrats either. I don't call them liberals either. They are not a bit liberal.
Do you recall the American Marine who entered Mexico with a gun in his car and they tossed him into jail and it caused a heck of a mess?
Calling them 'refugees doesn't make them refugees. Yes, the Chinese were armed in 1949 when they took the border with relatively few casualties but since then the Chinese have moved in to take over the Tibetan culture and businesses as well as the country. The millions of Muslims entering Western Europe as 'refugees' was a well laid plan.
The Mexican authorities didn't really care about the fuss, but they do care about Trump's threat with NAFTA, which is why they broke up that Honduran march. The question is why the Mexicans allowed the Hondurans to enter their country in the first place? I strongly suspect that they were okay with the Honduran invasion entering the US..
E-Verify. Why do they come here - work. But you see business doesn't want that, and maybe with good reason, so it will not happen. Besides it's not exciting.
What does armed or unarmed have to do with? We are just supposed to let anyone who is unarmed enter the country and live here just like that?
While Grant was president (1868-1876) he sent federal troops to the South to tamp down the Kluxers, as much as he could manage politically in a country deeply weary of war and troubles in the South. But the Democrats got control of the congress by 1878 and passed the posse comitatus act to enable the Kluxers to run wild, and to stymie any future Grant-like figure elected in the future from raining on the Kluxer parade. Posse comitatus was passed for a bad reason by bad people.
I think it is wonderful that America is going to use it's military to patrol our southern border instead of using it to kill civilians in the Middle East. Of course given our recent record of military sucesses could be that llegal immigration will actually increase but it will still ge hilarious to watch.
The problem is you're believing the Con Man Trump. illegal immigration is down. No no border guard was shot......... Investigated and found it Never Happened... Just fodder for Trumps kool aid addicts Before Trump unemployment was dropping like a stone, housing sales doing well and treaties were negotiated with America's best interest.......... Trump likes to say " Sky is Falling " I'm the only one who can save you. Before me you were really being taken advantage of.....ALL BS !!!!
I would like to see the military take over the San Ysidro an TJ crossings and turn them into a bottleneck. Some of those daily crossers might have to spend part of their US paychecks at motels and eating establishments here.
I'm against the idea of using our military as police. Those who think it's a good are idea obviously haven't served or didn't serve for long. Better to just send them into attack Mexico City, that's what they're trained to do. Not frisk Americans crossing into Mexico and back to buy Tequila, cheap blankets and vanilla extract.
Rather like the first gun control laws that were crafted to disarm black Americans and empower the racists in the South.
The problem is you don't know what I believe and would do better discussing what I say and what you believe.
The proposal is to station US troops along the border to repel non citizens who are attempting to enter the US illegally
What I found interesting is that these types of groups have been doing the same thing once or twice a year since 2010. Who knew?