Exactly - Thank you - and the District Judge in the DNC vs Russia , Trump and affiliates case - stated that this would not be a crime - is covered under the first amendment. Some Russian phones Trump - during the election campaign - says "we have dirt on Hillary " should we release it - how is Trump supposed to respond. 1) Do what you like ... nudge nudge wink wink 2) NO NO - Don't let the voter know the dirty deeds of a candidate prior to the election. 3) Please do release it - it is my patriotic duty to help the voter know "The Truth" about a candidate prior to the election. I don't want a Kangaroo court - and I want the Rule of Law and founding principles upheld. A special prosecutor is allowed to break those rules - and thus the bar must be high - and specific only to things directly related. That bar is high .. serious National Security Risk - Martial Law - and so on.. On that basis you may break the rules - not to investigate how many inches of Cigar that Slick Willy inserted into Monica's oval orifice - or Maniforts tax fraud a decade prior. That is what separates legitimate authority from illegitimate abuse of authority. The sentence of Stone is appalling - his lawyers stated that the norm was 24-36 months. The FBI actions were appalling - lying their way through the FISA system on a wild goose chase that they knew would not stand up in court - and somehow Golden Showers got into the mix. Then we had the CIA try to frame Papadopolous - Dubious So what was this National Security Risk .. That Trump helped Russia to do the Hack - or aided the FB ad folks. That is your investigation - as per same Judge as above - and they knew right away that Trump had nothing to do with either - and that the other stuff they were chasing was Legal - even if barely so.