Truther Heaven

Discussion in '9/11' started by Hannibal, Jun 27, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A few hours, due to the damage sustained and the resulting fires.
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who said the building detached?
     
  3. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    the core was pulverized by the falling debris?
     
  4. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    well you said the wtc "hit" wtc7...
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What core? No one mentioned a core.
     
  6. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    That's a funny question coming from someone "up in the air" about Israeli art students tossing ballistic gel dummies out the window of the World Trade Center.

    Did it have to be hit by a plane to collape?

    Who said I was joking?

    You're trying my patience, Jango. Now you're starting to sound like RWF. You come up with bull(*)(*)(*)(*) smartass statements like it in some way proves your case.

    You've read all those history books that you agree with that trash America, why don't you do some (*)(*)(*)(*)ing RESEARCH if you want to know what happened?

    Try below for a start and quit asking snarky god (*)(*)(*)(*)ed questions.

    http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/11/28/dark-fire/
    http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ah, you are simply arguing semantics.

    No thanks, I'll stick with evidence.
     
  8. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ok.. pic of the raging 47 floor inferno? and the damage of wtc "hitting" wtc7?
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Research, truth seeker. Read the reports f the firemen on the scene. You've been given the links.
     
  10. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so no photo exists?
     
  11. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's something of a complex question, because we both know that legality doesn't always guide our foreign policy, as history shows with armed responses to a country's land reform that affected a business of ours that's operating abroad, or pulling a coup in a country that has a democratically elected official (I.e he's too liberal for us), so our government should have been, in my mind at least, particularly after the embassy bombings, keen to doing some kind of operation to rid themselves of the threat, as they should have taken the threats at face-value given the '93 bombing, and the warnings that came afterward.
     
  12. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And you believe that as plausible?
     
  13. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In other words, you don't have it.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Having read the reports from various sources and looking at the evidence, yes I believe it very plausible.

    I have it, and so do you. The links have been supplied in this very thread. Go now and research them. Don't rely on being spoon fed information by other people.
     
  15. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    isnt that why youre here? to spoon feed information to crush anti-corrupt government conspiracy theorists?... soooo

    provide this "evidence" that you looked at... and made you believe there was a 47 floor raging inferno.
     
  16. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't know. I'm not really worried about whether or not a photo exists. I am able to believe things based on testimony, evidence, and the word of other credible sources -- links to which you have been provided.

    I don't need a photo of every event or phenomenon in the known universe to determine whether or not they "really happened". If you want to act like a 10 month old baby who really believes the object disappears during the game of peek-a-boo, that's your issue.

    Do you have any photos of anyone planting explosives there?

    You have been shown where to find it. Go read then come back and post something intelligent.

    If that's not too much to ask.

    You've eaten too much spoonfed information already it seems. Your username is very appropriate. You think right in lockstep with all the other truthers don't you.

    Perhaps doing a little research on your own would serve you well.
     
  17. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ive tried to find photos of a "47 floor raging inferno" i cant find any... i am asking our esteemed "debunkers" to spoon feed it to me... i am but a truther...
     
  18. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Maybe there aren't any. And what does that mean? That the firemen were lying? No pictures didn't happen? You don't like to read, just look at pictures? What is this fascination with pictures?
     
  19. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ok.... if no photos exist of a 47 floor raging inferno!! then what photos DO exist?
     
  20. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Are you familiar with Google? It works rather well.

    Besides didn't you answer that question in another thread?

    Or are you just trying a distraction?
     
  21. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    didnt i say ive tried looking for photos of a 47 floor raging inferno? tried looking... get it? i didnt just look at my screen and stare at it... i used search engines... i "googled" wtc7 47 floor inferno......

    building 7 inferno, wtc7 raging inferno,

    so when i said... "i couldnt find it" i didnt say...."i dont wanna look" youre pretty good at this...

    spoon feed me the photo please.
     
  22. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't have one.

    Now what does that tell you conclusively?
     
  23. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    tells me you have never seen a photo of wtc7 fully engulfed in a 47 floor inferno

    nothing follows,
     
  24. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Funny how truthers pretend their claims like all 47 floor are the only thing that matter and that if someone can't produce a picture of their claim then that somehow "proves" something other than the claim is silly.

    The collapse of WTC 7 was never stated to be caused by all 47 floors being on fire. It was one failure on one floor caused by fires that caused a cascade failure first vertically and then horizontally through the tower before the outer facade collapsed.

    Truthers pretending their claims somehow prove a conspiracy remind me of Cartman from South Park and his Chewbacca defense:

     
  25. groupthink

    groupthink New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol... no video of this vertical then horizonal collapse?
     

Share This Page