Truthers - Simple Q&A

Discussion in '9/11' started by Mike12, Jan 9, 2015.

  1. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,067
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no Jango, 'google' searches doesn't make you as knowledgeable as someone has has studied a particular science for years and years, attended school and earned advanced degrees.

    The vast majority of experts don't buy your claims because as i explain, they are backed up by no evidence and are simply a figment of truthers' imaginations.
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is most certainly NOT a figment of anybodies imagination that the video of the alleged "FLT175" penetrating the WTC tower wall, appears exactly as a B movie special effect of a ghost disappearing into a wall.
    It is NOT a figment of anybodies imagination that WTC7 was observed dropping for 2.25 sec at free-fall acceleration.
    It is NOT a figment of anybodies imagination that WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely & totally destroyed in the manner of a controlled demolition, while other buildings in the same complex suffered damage, but not complete destruction.
     
  3. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, there are none of the usual artifacts that accompany CGI and superimposition filming techniques.

    No, but the use of explosives is the product of an over-active imagination.

    And what meaning to you derive from this? It just sounds like a pretence at incredulity.

    - - - Updated - - -

    AND left a 'cartoon-like' plane shaped hole.
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For anyone who is curious, look up the B-25 crash into the Empire State Building and compare it to the WTC crash events and then THINK.

    Have a nice day

    : )
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Safe to say you missed the point,Bob...
     
  6. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,067
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there is nothing confusing about this, all makes perfect sense... The key thing Bob, is to conduct objective research. You see Bob, when truthers conduct research, they ONLY read articles, books written by truthers and completely dismiss any material which explains the events and debunks conspiracy theorists. This is why, Bob, you and your fellow truthers cannot be taken seriously.

    John the truther: "I know the truth, it's a conspiracy!"
    averege Joe: "Curious John, how do you know"
    John the truther: "Because i've googled all articles written by truthers"
    average Joe: "Have you also read all the sites, articles debunking conspiracies? like the popular mechanics piece? or sites like http://www.debunking911.com, http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11/ ?? even wikipedia has good info....
    John the truther: "It;s all lies, deceipt so i don;t bother"
    average Joe: "Oh, ok... says who? "
    John the truther: "Says the truthers, ok?"
    average Joe: "I see... "
     
  7. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have read the Popular Mechanics fiasco and its not compelling evidence at all!
    Note that in the case of the Empire State Building crash, the wings did NOT leave a wing shaped gash in the building, the aircraft stopped before getting that far into it. In the case of the alleged "FLT175" the aircraft disappears inside the building and does so in the manner of a B movie special effect, like a ghost disappearing into a wall.
     
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You mean to tell me you think the result of the 767s slamming into the towers should be just like the plane slamming into the Empire State Building?

    :roll:

    Explain what each scenario above had in common with each other that leads you to believe this.
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bump for bob to explain his case.
     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    He can't come up with a logical response so he'll just let it slide by until the question falls back a page.
     
  11. Vlad Ivx

    Vlad Ivx Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    When I mentioned physical evidence you went for the character attack (personal attack) rather than discuss the ideas... You seem to be the perfect supporter of those PNAC guys who mentioned in their manifesto that they wanna invent weapons that can target specific genetic types and also said that a new Pearl Harbor-like event is needed to shift the influence of America towards world military supremacy. But that's another story.

    I already told you regarding physical evidence that the crater of UA93 in Shanksville is very suspect. Have you ever seen it? Have you ever seen a crash site?

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Vlad Ivx

    Vlad Ivx Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
  14. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are you afraid of? I've never gotten this sentiment from the anti-conspiracists. Ideas are only contagious if you allow them to be.
     
  15. Hairball

    Hairball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    227
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    They were successful at getting the Democrats to take congress in 2006 nonetheless.

    The Dems rode the truther wave straight into the Capitol in 2006.
     
  16. Hairball

    Hairball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    227
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    So what?

    How is that significant?
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    for one thing,four and a half hours I'll never get back.
     
  18. Vlad Ivx

    Vlad Ivx Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Have you read the PNAC document? No matter who you agree with, to be part of this debate you need to have read at least a few chapters of it.
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes.and you're totally off base about what you think it means
     
  20. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Really?

    View attachment 32875
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and you picture there is intended to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt
    that "FLT11" & "FLT175" were indeed hijacked and flown into the twin towers?

    or?
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You made a claim and he proved you wrong. Will you admit to your own error?

    or?
     
  23. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bob, are you being dishonest here? I responded to your claim, nothing more.

    However, it does call into question your 'bounce off' hypothesis.
     
  24. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I proved with the actual figures about how the wall of the WTC towers was less than 1/3 window and nobody so much as gave me an acknowledgement of my having posted anything at all .... Thank YOU ever so much.

    People, this is totally off the deep end,
    the faction that supports the 19 suicidal Arabs story
    has NOTHING, there isn't any proof that there ever was any commercial airliner crashed at any of the 4 alleged crash sites, there is the more than controversial free-fall acceleration of WTC7, there is the complete & total destruction of the towers, there is the GHOST plane alleged "FLT175"....
    and on and on and there isn't any resolution of this stuff because the powers that B can not allow the issues to actually have a day in court because it would be proven beyond any doubt at all to have been a FALSE FLAG ATTACK.

    BTW: when is the academic community going to step up and actually take on the challenge?
    http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-...edentialed-professionals-need-only-apply.html

    Its there waiting for anybody who wants to have the bragging rights to have shut-down those silly truthers..... whats the problem?
     
  25. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your claim was proven incorrect and you failed to acknowledge it. Very dishonest, bob.
     

Share This Page