Two cases that caused abortion laws to be overturned

Who is supposed to fund her abortion? Abortion is surgery and has complications.

 

I do not plan to be derailed.

 

I doubt it

You have dumb as dirt Kavanaugh there - now who did pay off all his debts?
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/the-many-mysteries-of-brett-kavanaughs-finances/

 

Who is to fund anyone's surgery (all of which may have complications)?


BTW, the topic is NOT about funding

 

But you were the one suggesting that everything could be prevented with a couple of tablets

Oh! And BTW abortion is no longer just a surgical option

 

I only presented options. And the IUD definitely should not be swallowed with a glass of water.

 

Yes and 60% of women seeking abortion had had some form of birth control

 

Speaking only for my former 2 wives, gee they did not have any problems.

 

Why should you speak for your wives?

Why bring personal crap into this?

What two women MAY have said doesn't apply to the other billions of women and what they say and experience......

Post #79 ??? got a problem with it??

 

I do not plan to circle back to that post.

 

There isn't any question that the Texas law is contrary to the decades long interpretation of the constitution by the US Supreme Court.

And, THIS version of the court refused even to hear argument, choosing instead to make aback room decision.

This Supreme Court is just not qualified to make ANY decision AT ALL about what is constitutional. They proved that.

 

So far, you haven't even taken the time to understand what the issue is ABOUT.

You demonstrated that by thinking that some table about birth control methods was RELAVENT!!!!

And, that was after deciding that you could just claim that Texas law is the way YOU want it - justified by you thinking it would be handy for your preferred argument of the moment.

 

This is TOTAL sophistry.

These new Texas laws have NOTHING AT ALL to do with the cost of healthcare.

The governor who sight these laws did NOT make your claim.

This is as bad as you trying to claim that the existence of prophylaxis addresses this issue.

You need to 'fess up about what is actually motivating your ideas on this topic.

Until then, all you are spouting is sophistry.

 

The topic here is abortion.

These are options relating to the attempt to prevent pregnancy.

EVERY ONE OF THEM has a failure rate.

You have been told that multiple times.

Why are you resorting to promoting a fallacy that you KNOW is a fallacy?

 

Why the outrage. I asked one question. I then commented what Abortions are.
Why the faked outrage?

 

A very tiny failure rate.
Stop getting personal in your posts. This is a discussion not your day to vent.

 

You definitely are not qualified.

 

This is not a defense OR apology for your blatant sophistry.

This is a very serious issue that requires honesty.

 

Just let people enjoy sex. It is rather creepy and gross that you want to place the government in people's bedrooms.

 

Childbirth has complications too. Abortion is a lot safer.

Just sayin'.

 

It isn't slightly good enough to try justifying this assault on women with claims that too few women are injured to matter.

You don't even have a clue what the number is, besides this ethical bs that their lives don't matter.

 

Women are not being assaulted. Women are being protected.

 

- For decades, the Supreme Court has agreed that abortion is constitutional.

- This court rejected that in a back room without even hearing arguments.

Nobody has to be "qualified" to see the unacceptability of that.

 

Denying rights to health care decisions made between a doctor and a patient is NOT PROTECTION.

That is an assault.

 

Abortion is still legal. Stop making stuff up.