UA 175: Who created this fake footage from this rare south view?

This was a live broadcast shown after both towers had been hit, it shows flight UAL-175 still in the air even though it had supposedly hit the south tower about an hour before - We know why it was never aired again.LOL

FAA radar is tracking, in real time, flight 175 after it has
supposedly crashed into the WTC. This is perhaps an hour later.
Although many people do not believe an aircraft
hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still
cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help.

3 IFR aircraft in the air in a 30 mile radius of New york city is consistent with one hour of diversions and forced landings.

One hour before you would expect a very large multiple of 3 aircraft to be in the air. NY has several incredibly busy airports.Check anytime on FLIGHT AWARE and count the aircraft within a 30 mile radius of NY. There should be 60 to 100.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdXGSefI6pM&feature=player_embedded"]911 Aircraft(175) is still flying AFTER it has 'crashed' into the WTC. - YouTube[/ame]

 

How about here?
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html

And here?
http://ae911truth.info/wordpress/

How about scientific findings that support the OS?
http://sites.google.com/site/911science/

 

Exactly. The masses saw them on TV. On the ground no plane was anywhere near the south tower. The orb was ignored, mistaken for a small plane, or literally missed because it was so small.

"I was underneath it, I was looking at the tower, I had my camera in my hand, I heard the noise, I never saw the airplane." CASE CLOSED.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrbQ0u3xzk&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=25"]911stealth David Handschuh Propelled in Air a Block by Explosion & Saw No Plane - YouTube[/ame]

 

Is correctly quoting a post really that hard for you? If I make a flashy YouTube video demonstrating how to properly do it would that help??

He didn't but 45 seconds into the clip he said that 3 of the 4 flights "directed their detours to radar gaps" and that is where their transponders were turned off. Then he plots the red dots to indicate these spots and that's where he contradicts himself.

More paranoia on your part my friend. If you look through a listing of my posts, you will see that I post in a variety of subforums here at PF. I don't spend all of my time in the 9/11 forum. You however seem to post only in the 9/11 forum and, I'm guessing, that this is probably not the only 9/11 forum you frequent.

I've extended the courtesy of creating a link to my post listing for you since I doubt you could figure out how to find this listing on your own given the fact that you can't even properly quote a post.

An irrelevant question.

If the guy in the leather chair is guilty, why has he not been charged with crimes, tried, convicted, and imprisoned?

 

All you sent me for your so call credible sources are website that are very biased and only supports the OS of 911, they are completely one sided and I have come across those disinformation websites before. Only people who support the fairytales of the OS used these bias, opinionated, websites that lack any credibility to back their claptrap.

Now I do support A&E for 911 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

This site does not support the pseudo-science that you are trying to peddle to me.
I highly recommend you to take the time and read A&E technical papers on “real science” that proves something different happened at the WTC than what the government has been claiming. I am not interested in reading garble goop papers of people’s opinions which lacks any credible science that you have presented to me, thank you.

 

If he starts using quotations directly, he'll be called a shill. He doesn't want that.

 

(sigh) Blanket response that can be used for the site you presented as well. No discussion of the external sources, just blanket generalizations because you don't agree with the content.

Maybe you should have objectively READ some of the content before you jump to conclusions.

Here is some science for ya.
http://sites.google.com/site/911science/

 

Gage's group have never published any papers, technical or otherwise. Hard to read something that doesn't exist.

 

You mean like your blanket statement because you don’t agree with the content, don’t you?
Having this discussion with you is no different than me talking to a roll of used toilet paper.

Again I am not interesting in your pseudo-science that the scientific community does not support.
The scientific community supports A&E not the hoop-la that some of you continue to present.
I came here hoping to have an adult conversation, but I see I am dealing with close minded people who are stuck in a patriotic belief system supported by blind faith. Clearly I am wasting my valuable time with you.
It doesn’t matter what I bring to this thread it will be rejected as everything is according to all your past posts. IGNORE!

 

If this is so, then why do A&E have less than 1800 "A&E" petition signers, and zero technical papers published?

 

I never made any such claim about Richard Gage, and you are not being truthful. Perhaps ridiculing and playing juvenile games is your way of having a serious conversation. Now I understand why there are very few posters in these 911 threads. Waste of time…

 

I never made any such claim about Richard Gage, and you are not being truthful. Perhaps ridiculing and playing juvenile games is your way of having a serious conversation. Now I understand why there are very few posters in these 911 threads. Waste of time…

 

A&E is Gage's group. He's their leader.

 

Gage is on every webpage of the website. One would think that someone who is holding them up as the authority would know that; especially since the group doesn't even exist except for the website.

 

The plane myth failed by creating fake imagery in real-time. The orb was mistaken initially for a possible helicopter. WB11 showed an orb for 23 minutes and at 9:27 the first fake plane aired.

I doubled the speed of WB11's last orb showing, and their first plane morph. The most notable difference besides the silly morph is the orb moves straight west to east but the cgi is turning more left/north.



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIyGEDvG9KQ&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=34&feature=plpp_video]WPIX (WB11) 9/11 9:21 - 9:31 - YouTube[/ame]

 

Why don't you just give up your silliness.
This is a discussion forum.
You do not discuss or debate, you do not respond to facts, you ignore them.
You go over the same failed denials ad nauseam.
At social gatherings, you must be the most boring person in all of history.
Your mind is stuck like a bad cd, back there in 9/11.
The worst part is all your efforts are a waste of time.
And you've been stuck there for over a decade.
Tragic.

I just started researching 911 in September, 2011.

 

A&E have been discredited.
http://ae911truth.info/wordpress/topten/
Give it a read first and if you disagree with the individual points, I'd be interested in knowing why.

It is incredibly annoying and points out your lack of computer literacy.

My offer to help you still stands.

Only one on a political forum. How many 10aces on different conspiracy forums are there?

What was it a question of?

Why are you so mad? You must have missed this post.
http://www.politicalforum.com/4786350-post143.html

 

I, for one, will miss you.

 

My message is to short

 

That's because you typed most of it in between the QUOTE tags. And it's too short, not to short.

I was responding to impressme.

Sorry I confused you.

 

Flight 175 did not impact the south tower, a remote controlled did.