Unanswered questions about 9/11..

Discussion in '9/11' started by Cornergas, Apr 9, 2017.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It has nothing to do with "chicken" or "beef" it has to do with relevance, something you have no clue about (no offense).

    Well that's yet another lie. Everybody knows that's what we were officially told but most people who have done the research know that what we were told told is based on lies and fraud. The facts you ignore speak for themselves. Not you of course, you don't want to know because you're only interested in research that you believe supports the official fairy tale and reject facts, science and logic in favor of lies, theories and junk science.

    And if you're so convinced the official fairy tale is fact and it's "academic" to you, why are you posting here demanding other people's theories? That should be irrelevant to you.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2017
  2. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Wait a minute Charlie, Al-Qaeda admitted they did 9/11..:)

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/28/al-qaida-ahmadinejad-911-conspiracy
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My name is Bob, not Charlie. Try to get one thing right if you're capable. What "Al Qaeda" allegedly admitted or not has nothing to do with the evidence based fact that the 3 WTC towers were completely destroyed on 9/11 by explosive forces or that the official story is a massive lie based on fraud and a coverup. If you're trying to convince me of anything, you're wasting your time. You should have figured that out by now. OTOH, I don't care what you believe or don't, I'm not here to try to convince you of anything. I'm posting facts about 9/11 in order to share information and discuss it with those who care about 9/11. Posters such as yourself usually post here not because they give a rat's ass about 9/11 but because they believe it's for some sort of personal entertainment.
     
  4. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    On TV I saw airliners smash into the towers, starting a fire that melted the internal steel framework that made the towers collapse like a house of cards. Sorry mate but I didn't see no explosions.
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You didn't see the melting of internal steel framework on TV or anywhere either nor do you have any clue that your delusion of seeing melting steel framework on TV caused the towers to "collapse like a house of cards". Why do you need to lie with nearly every post? You're impressing no one with your fairy tale stories. Sorry mate.

    OTOH the video I posted shows quite clearly that explosive forces were destroying the North Tower top down in succession at a measured accelerating rate. And the physical evidence supports the lateral ejection of multi-ton steel structures at distances of up to 600 feet, some at measured velocities of 50 MPH or more. You claim to see steel framework melting on TV but you can't see what is really happening. You have some serious issues mate. But then again, why do you think I care what you see or don't or your delusional stories?
     
  6. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That reminds me of another poster who claims to have seen Muslims crashing into the towers and the Pentagon on TV. Where do these posters come from and who are they trying to impress with their idiotic delusions?
     
  7. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    If you're saying muslims also detonated explosives as well as flying airliners into the towers, yes I got no beef with that, I wouldn't put it past them..:)
     
  8. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Well who were piloting the airliners, the Amish?..:)
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't matter what I say or don't say, you'll make it up as you go either way.

    See what I mean?
     
  10. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fortunately, you weren't there and you're nobody who means anything in terms of 9/11 so you're irrelevant. The facts are always what's relevant and the fact is that many did see explosions on 9/11. Not only did some see explosions but some heard, felt and were injured by explosions on 9/11. This is very well documented, both on video and on audio transcript.



    Do me a favor and stick to your delusions about seeing the "melting of internal steel framework on TV". It's what you do best.
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2017
  11. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,082
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    48
    That animation is so hilarious. No concrete slab that had the knuckles of the trusses embedded in the slab. The trusses could not come down separately like that..
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  12. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Which brings us back to a couple questions I've asked more than once in this thread but nobody seems willing to step up to the plate and give answers, namely-
    1- If somebody planted explosives to bring the towers down, why did they go to all the trouble of flying airliners into them just before?
    2- If explosives were used, who planted them, was it muslims, the US Govt or the Amish or who?
     
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why do you insist on using a plural pronoun implying you speak for a group of people when it's obvious it's just YOU? Are you so uncomfortable speaking for yourself that you need to pretend you're a group of people?

    Why would you believe anonymous posters have answers to questions no one has the answers to other than those who were knowingly and directly involved in 9/11?

    Just some rhetorical questions, answers from you aren't required or expected.

    In any case, the topic of this thread is "Unanswered questions about 9/11" so those are very good questions that I would also want answered but not by anonymous posters. I would want a legitimate forensic/scientific and criminal investigation into all aspects of 9/11 to try to arrive at the answers to many of these unanswered questions. Including of course the many questions I've posted in this thread.
     
  14. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,775
    Likes Received:
    2,382
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The facts and evidence show that explosives of some sort were employed. Pretend for a moment you are Sherlock Holmes. The horizontal ejection of structural pieces show that. The only people who actually know who did it are the people in on the planning and execution, and that excludes me and Bob the poster. I will assume that it also excludes you.

    The airplanes were flown into the towers for spectacle, and as a cover for the explosions which brought them down. Can you understand that?
     
  15. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay that prompts the next question-
    1- Who planted the explosives?
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,697
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    follow the money
     
  17. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Ultimately the question is of little practical significance." - 9/11 Commission Report
     
  18. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I've almost given up trying to get straight answers from consp theorists!
    They post their consp-theories, but then can't or won't follow up by discussing it in detail so that we can analyse it.
    Same with flat earthers, I've asked them why ships don't fall off the edge of the world if it's flat, but they can't or won't give an answer..:)
     
  19. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps you should try asking a straight question.

    Collapse theories are not conspiracy theories, perhaps you should learn the difference. You posted your collapse theory (sprinkled with lies) and you've been shown how it makes no sense so you can't back it up with anything. Don't be a hypocrite now.

    This section has nothing to do with "flat earthers", take the above nonsense to the appropriate thread.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  20. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay, you said "explosive forces" brought down the towers.
    Do you mean somebody planted explosives, or do you mean the jet fuel exploded?
     
  21. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,186
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't ascertain what caused those explosive forces, that is well outside my purview. Because of the manner in which the buildings were ripped apart top down by explosive forces in accelerating succession (as observed in videos) and the resulting debris field, the likelihood is that it was a planned demolition using some kind of explosive material. That's just plain common sense. What that material might have been is anyone's theory. The likelihood that it was strictly jet fuel explosion or fire from any source is virtually nil. That would make no sense.

    Any kind of planning would obviously entail that it was done deliberately and by experts. But that's all theoretical based on documented observation and physical results. Regardless, the first step in any investigation is to forensically try to determine the most likely cause using standard investigative protocol, not wave it away as NIST did by falsely claiming it was "inevitable". Once it's determined that it was deliberate via preponderous evidence (if it is), as opposed to a natural resulting occurrence, then it follows that a criminal investigation would be conducted to try to determine the rest.
     
  22. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,775
    Likes Received:
    2,382
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An excellent question!
     
    Dropship likes this.
  23. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,082
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It is like people don't get how reality works. Physics is incapable of caring about people. You are essentially saying that if you don't know who did it, then airliner impacts and fire had to be able to cause all of that.

    Even if I believed aircraft impacts and fire could destroy the towers I would have expected physicists and engineers to have created physical and virtual models to account for the phenomenon by January of 2003. But instead we do not even have accurate data on the distribution of mass in steel and concrete down the buildings which is very peculiar since the conservation of momentum alone would affect the collapse time.

    I DON'T CARE WHO! I don't care WHY!

    Explain the PHYSICS!

    Because now the issue is the integrity of our entire technical educational system.

    http://psikeyhackr.livejournal.com/1276.html

    psik
     
  24. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    The official explanation is that the burning jet fuel softened the steel trusses and made them sag and pull on the outer concrete pillars which then snapped and rebounded outwards as in 1/2/3/4, triggering the collapse like a house of cards.
    Seems logical to me, or am I missing something?-

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2017
  25. Dropship

    Dropship Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    It's been suggested by false flag consp-theorists that the US Govt did 9/11 to give themselves an excuse to invade the muslim mideast.
    But the fact is the US Govt ALREADY HAD a valid excuse to invade because terrorists had already attacked one of the towers with a truck bomb several years before, plus satellites had already pinpointed terrorist training camps in the mideast.
    In short, the US Govt didn't need to do 9/11 at all..:)
     

Share This Page