Soupnazi is now the only poster I've ever put on ignore. There is not one post I want to see from this troll again.
Wrong much like you he has conceeded defeat because it is HE who is not rational and refuses to have an honest discussion. It is you guys in childish denial
Honest discussion? lol...you do not know the meaning of the word..all you know is parroting denial...like I told you before go see your psychiatrist and deal with your insecurities of the past, then try and post something relevant on here.
He doesn't concede anything...he is just tired of your moronic, idiotic denials, that have no validity..
Ok since you seem to be a self proclaimed authority on honest discussion answer this question. Quote one specific passage of the 911 report which you claim is false and show evidence that it is a lie. Any time. If you do not do so it destroys your entire claim. Bob and your best friend are not here to do so they are only here to state belief. I have denied NOTHING and it is a lie to say I have what I have done is point out fact that their argument is based on fallacy and ideological assertions with no evidence. Get this fact straight it is not intelligent to base an argument on you hate government. It is not intelligent to base an argument on one side and only one side while willfully living in ignorance on what the other side says and that applies to you.
Yes he does concede and so do you. You have presented NO evidence of any kind to support your assertions and that is FACT not denial. I have never denied you have beliefs and opinions but it is a lie to call anything you have said a fact
You provide no answers to the relevant questions so useless to talk to someone such as yourself who is totally brainwashed by the government and refuses to discuss the relevant questions, but keeps parroting the same old garbage....grow up, move out of mommy's basement, get a job, do some research, and try again...
That is because they were questions rooted in a lie which means by defnition no relevant answers can be given. When you confine ACCEPTABLE answers to anything EXCEPT the governments reports and evidence it is clear you do NOT want honest answers you only want one side to give theory. The author ( bobo the clown ) specifically stated he did not want any answer from any government source and then stated an out right lie calling such answers theory. This gives it all away and destroys any claim to wanting answers. It is you guys parroting garbage which is proven false by evidence no matter how many times you repeat yourselves. I have done more research than you and you suck at research. You actually started this thread with a bullshit self defeating link which was debunked instantly. If you want to show how well researched you are answer my question and quote one specific passage of the 911 report which you claim is a lie and show evidence it is a lie IF you D NOT answer that it proves you are uninformed and have done no research
The official 9/11 is garbage, as you say...it does not answer any of the relative questions to the topic and did not interview any witnesses that would expose the truth about the government's involvement in the 9/11 events..you can love it all you want, but your lack of intelligence is indicative of the lack of details in the "official" report...but it makes you happy so the old saying "ignorance if bliss" certainly applies to you in this instance.
You would not know it is garbage or what pertinent questions it answers because you have NEVER READ IT. It does indeed answer those questions and provides evidence which is something you never do. There are no such witnesses who can expose what you dishonestly call the truth. Now quote one specific passage from the report which is false and show evidence that it is false. If you do not do so it is de facto proof everything you have just claimed is a lie
Would be nice if those with questions about the report would ask questions about the report. Or, better yet, provide their own scenario.
Why do you need a "scenario"? The report is a waste of paper, not based on any kind of reasonable forensic, criminal or scientific investigation. It was also admitted by the 9/11 Commission chairs that it was incomplete. Not only incomplete, but far from complete because they recommended a permanent 9/11 Commission. No one needs a "scenario" to know and understand that once aware of the facts. You'd rather delve into theory than facts, I can understand that. You're a conspiracy theorist, after all you bought the official one.
Again, your ability to read betrays you. "Questions about the report" means just that...questions about the report sh!t brains. As for the Commissioners, every one of them signed off on it giving it their approval.
Why don't you and your bum buddy Nazi..go to his shrink and get help....failing that find a quiet location and get rid of your repressed sexual lives on each other...seems that might be your problem...
Speaking of where you brains are, everyone of them also used the toilet. It doesn't change a thing about what they said and I posted, in this thread and in this one: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...mission-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.495859/ You know, those are called FACTS, the ones anyone can read, you excluded apparently.
When commissioners sign off on a report that is issued by their commission, they are giving it their approval. All commissioners approved of their final product. I have no doubt that many thought they could do better. Seldom do you get high performance teams that see their final result as optimal. I imagine when they go to the restroom, the name their turds Bob after you.
Speaking of turds usda...you qualify, you and nazi, seem to be a couple of fudge packers, so be careful not to reuse your rubbers if you use them..cause you will have sh.t on your rubbers...and sh.t for brains....
When commissioners use the toilet to defecate, they use toilet paper, if there is any, at least the ones who are civilized. And they wipe until they approve of the results. I understand this is something you have no clue about but that's what civilized people usually do. Unfortunately, their approval doesn't change what they dropped into the toilet. It also doesn't change what they said (the FACTS) no matter what silliness you post that you believe somehow covers up the FACTS. Sorry child (your insults betray your age), I know you want really badly want to believe that the 9/11 Commission Report is "accurate" (or at least that's what you're pretending) or that the Commissioners didn't say what they did say but unfortunately that is the reality, not your delusions or your silliness.
Well, feel free to post the inaccuracies. If you don't understand the word, have an adult look it up for you and explain what it means. If you can't post any inaccuracies...then, by definition, it is accurate. Thanks for proving my point over and over. Have fun in the turd bowl with the other truthers.
It was in fact based on reasonable science and forensics and evidence. You would not know that of course because you have never read it. When anyone points out specific flaws or errors in the report it is fine because they are actually questioning it. When someone merely repeats over and over again that it is a lie or it is a cover up or what ever without ever citing what it says it is clear that said person simply wants to believe conspiracy theory. You have a faith in conspiracy theory which is religious like. Never look at facts or evidence but merely repeat the same claims over and over and insist they are true. They did not recommend a permanent committee as such a committee would be a complete waste of time and money
You quoted an earlier post where you only stated your own opinion. Onions are not facts but you do tend to confuse them a lot
"Inaccuracies" is a mild, government APOLOGIST way of putting it, SCAM is a much more descriptive word for what it was. Senator Max Cleland, an original member of the 9/11 Commission, agrees: "This is a SCAM, it's disgusting. America is being cheated." It doesn't matter what I post or how many times the FACTS are posted, you will forever deny the FACTS and pretend the report is "accurate" because you're not here for a serious discussion about 9/11, you're only here to troll, using juvenile posts I might add. Your silly insults don't change the FACTS or cover them up no matter how many times you want to attack me for posting them. But I'm sure you will continue because like I said, you're ONLY here to troll. For adults however, in the report itself there is a DISCLAIMER that states that 2 entire chapters are totally unreliable (page 146, PDF page 163). It's all here to read for those who want the FACTS about the 9/11 Commission and their report. And because about 25% of the footnotes used to support the claims in the report are based on what is unreliable (i.e. 3rd party TORTURE based "testimony"), it renders the entire report worthless. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...mission-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.495859/
Where have I seen this before? Oh yes that's right the Scott school of debating conspiracy theory. When asked to provide specific citations and evidence to support a baseless assertion merely link to a previous post on the same forum where you made the same assertion without evidence or fact to support it. Then claim that repetition is evidence. Claim to be quoting someone but provide no source for the quote, Bobo the clown has never presented facts or evidence but only mindless assertions. Notice he states it is ALL RIGHT HERE but it is not all right here because he shows no PDF at all. Sorry bob you are still a massive fail
