UNESCO Passes Resolution Critical of Israeli Conduct in Jerusalem and Gaza

The official commentery of the Red Cross, and Article 2 of the convention shows otherwise.

 

Yes they had, due to the engouregment of the Arab leaders.

 

the Red Cross is not an international treaty and is not legally binding.

you lose.

hahahahahaha!!!!

 

The Rod Cross has a crucial part of the creation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and therefore needs to be taken seriously regarding the Fourth Geneva Convention.

 

ICJ is more important than the Red Cross

you lose!!!!

 

70% didnt see any Israeli soldier, according to an Arab institute in Beirut, as I showed earlier.

 

And yet, the Rod Cross has a crucial part of the creation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and therefore needs to be taken seriously regarding the Fourth Geneva Convention.

 

you dont have to see a soldier to be a refugee

 

ICJ is more important than the Red Cross

 

You also not a refugee if you laft by choice and the engouregment of the Arab leaders.

 

And yet, the Rod Cross has a crucial part of the creation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and therefore needs to be taken seriously regarding the Fourth Geneva Convention.

 

LOL!!!

tell us again how more than 70% of Palestinians are Crypto-Jews.

I need a good laugh.

 

First of all you need to stick to the subject in hand.

 

no please, i need a good laugh.

 

You can go to a standup and laugh.

 

that's what your comments are.

a comedy club.

 

If according to you history is laughable, and thus something that doesnt need to be taken seriously, then it is not my problem.

 

you dont post history, just lies and comedy.

 

I'm only using history.

 

you wouldn't know history if you tried

 

The commentary says that article 49 is derived from the Tokyo Draft.
That means that the Tokyo Draft is the source of article 49.
The Red Cross asked questions about this to experts.
And experts than made this text of article 49

It does not say the Red Cross disagrees with article 49 at all.


Article 49 says you may not transfer your civilians on occupied territory.
Israel does that. It is coordinated and supported by the ministry of defense.

The UN, the USCG and the ICJ say this applies to Israel and the settlements.
You have not sourced that the Red Cross disagrees.

Even if you could prove the Red Cross disagrees. It does not matter. The UN, the USCG and the ICJ are just more important. And you can not prove the Red Cross disagrees, because they agree. In fact.

 

You have not sourced how many left.
I have. Its 5%

Jews and Israel are responsible for the rest
A full 100% have the right to go home.
It is protected by the UN Charter.
Jews thieved their properties.
They must leave.

 

Nazi propaganda is not "history"

 

What kind of Cross?

 

So what. Only 5% left because Arab leaders.
Others left due to imminent danger.
This does not contradict.

They are all allowed to go home according to the UN Charter.
Israel violates it.