UNESCO Passes Resolution Critical of Israeli Conduct in Jerusalem and Gaza

Read post #1008 and #992

 

delete

 

delete

 

funny, I never heard of the "rod cross".

LOL!!!

 

what does "laft" mean?

 

Why, I believe stuntman meant to say, Red Cross. Happy to translate...

Where's moon, does anyone knows? i've missed her...

 

we have no idea what she meant to say

 

Why, will we learn

Yes, we do. Even without context (of which there were plenty) Rod Cross can only mean a second rate Australian physicist, or Red Cross.

Within context? No contest!

 

It fine when people make mistakes in spelling. But seriously. When a poster keeps on typing rod instead of red... than your English language skills aint good.

 

Did you know, in German Red is Rot? It is easy to make and repeat mistakes, when Ingliz is not your first language. And why would you discuss poster's language abilities in the first place?

 

Because he posts something from the Geneva Conventions of article 49.
It went with a comment that it originated from an earlier piece of text.
It says the red cross asked some questions about it.

And with that, that poster concludes the Red Cross doesn't like it.
It's totally illogical. The poster clinged on that conclusion for a week.

The only logical conclusion to be made is that the poster does not understand English well.
And keeping on misspelling a basic word all the time only adds to that conclusion.

His google translate is broke, yo.


Besides. An adult German would not make this mistake.
Their schools are too good to have this weird mistake happen.

 

she's not German

 

Please stop attacking me.

 

The official commentary of the Red Cross says that the Fourth Geneva Convention was made due to the reality that was existed in the WWII. Hence, it came to solce the problems that such reality created. Such reality does not exist in Judea and Samaria, and thus Article 49 cannot be applicable in this territtory.

According to the official commentary of Article 49, it states that Article 49 was formed to deal with the reality of transfer of people in the WWII. The reality of the WWII does not happen in Judea and Samaria, and thus cannot be applicable on this territory.

It is been contradicted by the official commentary of the Red Cross (pages 17-1, and Article 2 of that convention.

The Rod Cross has a crucial part of the creation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and therefore needs to be taken seriously regarding the Fourth Geneva Convention.

 

According to a research report by the Arab-sponsored Institute for "Palestine" Studies in Beirut the majority of the Arab refugees were not been expelled and 68% according this report left by choice and without seeing any Israeli soldier, as I showed earlier.

Israel did not evecuated all of those who left, and therefore not all of them are refugees.

 

The existance of Mein Kampf is part of history. Or maybe are you saying that Mein Kampf was never written?

 

Please dont play dumb, you know I meant the Red Cross.

 

Its been contradicted by an Arab Institute in Beirut that find that 70% of the "refuges" never saw an Israeli soldier.

Israel did not evecuated all of the Arabs. Israel is not responsible for those who left by choice.

 

Please dont play dumb, you know I meant the Red Cross.

 

Arent you a person that his first language is English? You know what it means.

 

Who ever said that I'm a woman? Or maybe the post-modern reality of today that gender and sex is subject to interpretation affects you?

 

The report said they left before seeing a soldier. You are making it up that it was leaving by choice. They could have left due to imminent danger. And I sourced who left by choice and who left by imminent danger.

irrelevant
A full 100% have the right to go home.
It is protected by the UN Charter.
Jews thieved their properties.
They must leave.

 

Its not contradicting. You just don't understand what it says.

People who left by choice, 5%, also got the right to return to their homes by choice.
I leave my house by choice all the time.

 

Well you sure as hell did not understand that the commentary of the "Rod Cross". Nowhere does it say they disagree with article 49. They in fact support article 49, and say it applies to Israel and the settlements, just like the ICJ, the UN, and the UNSG. You pointing at article 2, does not mean a thing, since article 49 says it's illegal. So it has been judged and ruled by the world's highest of institutions.

 

The 70% left due to the fact that they were provided encouregment from the Arab leaders.

Israel was not evecuated all of the Arabs, and they are not responsible for tthose who left by choice.