Unmarried sexual relations

Behavior adaptations as a solution to survival problems

 

even that is a generality...there are tribal societies that didn't give a care about abstinence and fidelity even incest was on the

 

For openers, I think you really men theists ("deists" were popular during the Enlightenment era).

And it is horribly wrong to persecute those for a lack of religious beliefs--or for actually having religious beliefs.

The latter are not merely non-theists; rather, they are militant atheists.

And your easy association of a twentieth-century monster Christianity--in addition to your use of such terms as "religious nutters," "tooth fairy," and "silly fables"--indicates that you fall (sadly) into the latter category...

 

the days of non deists passively standing by while religious nutters continually kick us in the teeth are gone we're not Ghandi's...the tooth fairy crowd crapped on us for centuries and still do, we'll meet your discrimination head on ...

 

I suppose it would do no good to point out--again--that Deists were an Enlightenment-era sect--and should not be confused with theists.

But please feel free to show your true colors. (Of course, most religious people are not "nutters," as you have so eloquently(?) phrased it. And we have no desire to "kick [you] in the teeth"--even metaphorically.)

But you appear hopelessly embittered. So--as I have previously said--please feel free to indicate, for all to see, who you really are.

 

Physically a woman's life is divided into three parts,childhood where she cannot conceive,womanhood where she can conceive and post menopausal when she can no longer conceive.As an unmarried woman in her period of conception she runs the risk of becoming pregnant each and every time she engages in unprotected sex,but once post menopausal she is at liberty to engage in sex as often as she wants without that risk.One has to believe that our creator God deliberately designed her to be this way with the intent that frequent sex would be her reward??Whether she is married or not is irrelevant,sex was intended by God to be a pleasurable experience for both men and women.

 

Well, depending on the sexual position, he may be expressing a gape. If you need further explanation watch the film series "Planet of The Gapes".

 

Sounds to me like you are whining because a spade has been called a spade.

 

Does so in this century as well.

 

I am not quite sure what the intended antecedent of "Does so in this century as well" may be.

If it is the point that unmarried sex often leads to unwanted pregnancies, I would assert that this is exceedingly rare if proper birth control methods are used.

And if a condom is used together with an IUD or "the pill," it is almost unheard of for a pregnancy to then occur.

 

I don't suppose it occurs to you that there might be negative effects other than pregnancy, STDs or other physical consequences.

 

such as?

 

In the case of two virgins - there is no possibility of STD. Sexual relations would then be ok right ?

 

And IT IS NOT rare for people to have sex without proper birth control methods. The over .5 Million abortions a year in the US alone is ample evidence of this fact.

 

Children born to unmarried mothers have higher rates of poverty, juvenile delinquency, teen pregnancy, drug and alcohol abuse, HS dropouts and criminal conviction as an adult.

 

?????? "Sexually Transmitted" diseases doesn't mean that they are ONLY transmitted by sex.

 

Yep. Its biology not religion. From BC Roman Law.

Mater semper certa est ("The mother is always certain")
pater semper incertus est ("The father is always uncertain")
pater est, quem nuptiae demonstrant ("the father is he to whom marriage points")

 

but you said OTHER than pregnancy. This is all a direct result of pregnancy. Try again.

 

and in every single civilization for the entirety of human history, including BC romans, people did not abstain from sex prior to marriage. It is against biology to abstain from sex. Lol

 

I never said otherwise.

 

rendering your post............pointless.

 

Clarification - by Virgins - in this instance - assume that neither has had sexual contact of any kind.

 

????? No, my point remains. Its biology not religion.

 

Were all the people that contracted HIV through tainted blood transfusions actually having sex with the blood donor? How about medical personnel who contracted it through treating infected people?

 

That's true .. OK then - in the case of virgins (using the previous definition) who have not had blood transfusions and have no STD's ... is unmarried sex OK ?