Vacation & hours worked

Discussion in 'Labor & Employment' started by Diablo, Dec 24, 2017.

  1. Diablo

    Diablo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    2,327
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  2. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lower hours would be consistent with productivity enhancement. However, you'd need a radical transformation of US capitalism (based around the premise of achieving much greater levels of equity).
     
    Diuretic and Diablo like this.
  3. Old Man Fred

    Old Man Fred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    I think work life balance is a bunch of bullshit.

    We only work 40 hours a week, which easily leaves plenty of time to pursue other interests, not to mention that in this day and age live is becoming rapidly automated. What used to be a full time job(homemaker) can now be done in a few minutes a week with a few clicks.

    We might gradually shift to 20-30 hour work weeks as automation takes over, but that's because of a declining need for labor. Not because some whiny idealists have extremely poor time management.
     
    GrayMan likes this.
  4. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,371
    Likes Received:
    3,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The comment about automation is correct however with reduced labor, tax will be diminished. To compensate you would need a high energy tax which would essentially tax robots and computers. Then as companies produce their own power, like wood mills do by burning left over saw dust, you would have to instead tax emissions.
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2018
    Sallyally likes this.
  5. Old Man Fred

    Old Man Fred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    That's why I think Sander's Medicare for All plan is incredibly stupid. Let's create a giant, unfunded entitlement, and base what revenue it will generate on employment.
     
  6. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not really. We'd just see acceleration of positive deindustrialisation: shifting labour towards service sector and bespoke product.
     

Share This Page