Notice the rate of destruction for the twin towers & 7 Note the manner of the penetration of the tower walls by the alleged "FLT11" & "FLT175" ...... where is the airliner in any of the 4 alleged crashes that day, indeed, where is the aircraft? The tiny amount of metal scrap that was presented as alleged evidence of an airliner having been crashed there? What happened to the flight recorders from "FLT11" & "FLT175"? You allege that there is evidence that points to suicidal Arabs hijacking airliners, OK, were are the airliners?
and you use that allegation to justify the fact of there being NO accounting at all for the alleged aircraft bits that were recovered.
It was fact not allegation and yes there was a proper accounting of the pieces if you had ever bother reading
What "report" is that, and it would help if you had page numbers to reference. Getting thrown a 10,000 page document with no references is not helpful. is there a machine searchable version available? really what is there, you people seem to be the authorities on the subject, so were is the data?
No. It has been provided to you in detail many times on many threads. Your game is to ignore it and then repeat your false claims so go back and read
Yes it does you have been provided with it and ignore it then continue with your lies about evidence of your own
Is it a lie to state that the twin towers fell in less than 15 sec ea.? is it a lie to state that the mass of bits found outside the Pentagon constitute less than 1% of the mass of an airliner? is it a lie to state that in the case of the alleged 4 airliner crashes on 9/11/2001 there was NO inventory of aircraft bits? what?
in searching the threads, I find nothing that supplies evidence to the claim that the aircraft bits were accounted for. + on other forums I have asked the same question with the same result and a web-search yields nothing. What sort of special magic do you have?
Can you find me a public report that catalogs of all the debris, complete with serial numbers, from a plane that has crashed at some point in the past?
The usual procedure is for the NTSB to investigate a crash and they put the reports of their investigations on their web site, the exception is the 4 airliner crashes on 9/11/2001, since this was the basis for creating whole new bureaucracies, I believe the taxpayers & voters of this land are owed a good bit of detail when it comes to accounting for this disaster. So far, it has NOT been proven at all that hijackers took control of airliners and used them as weapons. The total lack of an airliner at Shanksville & for that matter any of the crash sites + the fact that in the case of the lack of aircraft remains, people are spouting off lame excuses like "the airliners at the twin towers had whole 110 story skyscrapers fall on them" ( I have actually heard that one used in a discussion ) and the reality is that the airliners did not have all 110 stories fall on them and the imagery of a whole skyscraper falling on an airliner and thus pulverizing ALL of it into tiny little bits even to the extent of totally destroying the flight recorders, and people are supposed to simply buy it and continue the daily status quo ..... If you are not outraged, you are not paying attention!
I asked you to provide me a public catalog of recovered airplane parts from any previous plane crash and you can't come up with anything? So your request for us to provide this information is moot right?
In the case of high profile crashes such as Pan Am 104 the airliner is reassembled in a hanger to examine what happened, In the case of 4 airliner crashes from 9/11/2001, the aircraft bits were simply tossed in a box and never even inventoried? I can very well ask, why the secrecy? what are they hiding?
Pan Am 104 wasn't a 'crash investigation' as much as it was an accident investigation,Also you never answered the question
if you have to call it an accident investigation or crash, or whatever, pick your word. what is going on here is that in the case of the 4 airliners ( or alleged airliners ) the bits from the crash sites were gathered up and disposed of ( or sent back to the airlines ..... for? ) and the public has NO accounting what so ever of how much by volume or weight was collected up, and exactly what is the specific nature of the bits that were collected up. In the matter of potential court cases on this subject, somebody just illegally disposed of evidence. The fact that the airliners are unaccounted for is unconscionable.
Knowing that the complete of each tower took longer than 15 seconds each? Yes, that would be a lie. Stating the above and now knowing the towers took longer than 15 seconds to completely collapse? Not a lie. A lie? Maybe. Stating something based on wrong information doesn't make it a lie. How did you come up with that number? I can easily say that the debris found outside of the Pentagon constitute 20%. Again. Show me an inventory of plane debris with serial numbers that is available to the public from a previous crash. Otherwise your statement above holds no water.
If you wanted to state that the bits outside the Pentagon constituted 20% of the mass of the airliner, how would you support that assertion? in all other aircraft crashes that the NTSB has investigated, it is known how much of the aircraft was recovered and there is some level of accounting for the wreckage. In the case of 9/11/2001, what happened?
Read the reports I linked to you. From the NTSB, regarding 9/11. (You remember, the ones you claimed didn't exist?)
I was looking for more like physical proof that there were airliners at any of the 4 crash sites(?) That link is a joke ....... right?
So you didn't bother reading the reports you claimed didn't exist. Nor did you admit you were mistaken. Not very honest of you. Why can't truthers tell the truth?
