Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Destroyer of illusions, Aug 8, 2020.
Because from the cover officer's point of view he is bringing it to bear on the contact officer?
Police Unions have apparently pushed for this so that now there is very little that they need to answer to. That and lack of training seem to be what has created the situation and needs to change. In Portland the police have been reported as standing by the far right. There is for instance a film of them helping people into a car - the car later ploughed into people. They could tell it was the same car as the number plates were visible. I remember when I was studying sociology we were taught that Policemen would be the criminals if they were not police. For some though not all that is true.
Bunkum. Who has reported the police in Portland as 'standing by the far right'? BLM rioters? They helped people into a car and that car later ploughed into people? So they were supposed to have a crystal ball/mind reading abilities? Who taught you sociology? I think you should ask for your money back?
I believe it was Democracy Now though I am not sure but as a man who has been encouraging people to cause the maximin pain to children because he believes they cannot feel pain because they have autism you have nothing to say. You promote violence and believe in harming the vulnerable and you claim to be a Police Officeer. You are ther sort of person people want rid of.
You mean you're a coward and you're walking away? Come on, have the courage of your convictions, just admit you're wrong. They're not 'vulnerable', they're more dangerous than anyone else.
I'm the sort of person people want to get rid off? Yes, I believe in democracy, I believe in fairness, I believe in justice, I believe in free speech, hardly surprising folks like you want to get rid of folks like me, huh?
How the hell is having it behind his back, "bringing it to bear?"
And brings it round to his front, bringing it to bear on the contact officer,
Dude was zero threat but since he was white, his death will be no threat either
And you can see that he "brings it round to his front" in the video?
None of it does!
If he did the right thing the VICTIM that he MURDERED by PANICKING would still be alive.
Ignorance is LETHAL!
The KILLER cop MURDERED an innocent VICTIM that was COMPLYING with the police.
Yes, he brings it round to his right side as if drawing a bead on the contact officer.
No he didn't, he shot a man who clearly pulled a gun on him.
Complete and utter bovine excrement!
There is NOTHING in either video showing the victim "pulling a gun" on the KILLER cop who MURDERED the victim by SHOOTING him in the BACK.
Why do you persist in posting crap that is NOWHERE to be seen in the videos themselves?
You've maintained that the cover cop's perspective is the only one that mattered and his partner was in danger which is why he used lethal force. Now, you're saying "he shot a man who clearly pulled a gun on him".
He answered the door with the gun at his front. He could have shot the officer at that moment. Your gun placed in the middle of your back is not much of a defense and is of no threat to anyone
Because that's what the video shows, didn't you watch it? He conceals the gun in the small of his back and then brings it around towards the contact officer.
Yes, he pulled a gun on both of them?
No he didn't, he had the gun concealed on the small of his back and then brought it around towards the contact officer.
Wrong. We can see the gun at the moment he opened the door.
That is BS because the MURDERED victim does NOTHING of the sort in the video!
The cover officer can, so he correctly shout a warning to his oppo
Victim? The gunman who pulled a pistol on the police.
Separate names with a comma.