We Just Breached the 410 Parts Per Million Threshold

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Denizen, Apr 23, 2017.

  1. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    30,963
    Likes Received:
    28,434
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you not realize your own hypocrisy? CO2 bad, according to you, and here we have a demonstration of substantial abuse. And yet, for you, it's fine, because it's the O, and you agree that the elite aren't a part of the solution. It's laughable.

    The funny thing here is that you're attacking me for your own Malthusianism. I'm in no way asking for a stoneage. I'm pointing out that it IS and integral part of the AGW dogma. CO2 bad. Must eliminate. And yet, mr O can globe trot to the detriment (as defined by you and your AGW crowd) of the planet, and it has no impact on you.

    Which brings us to why. Why? Why is it ok for the SJW crowd to be the destructive force they are, in your mind? If regulation isn't explicitly for them, who?
     
  2. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,415
    Likes Received:
    2,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I recognize you're using a dishonest strawman.

    You're starting with a preconceived belief, that liberals are awful, based on your purely emotion-based political beliefs. You're then trying to adjust reality to fit your emotions. We rational people, OTOH, go where the facts lead, so we don't have to twist reality. That's one reason why it's so good to be a liberal. To "win", we just have to point at reality.

    Unlike you, I and all the intelligent people understand scale. You don't, so you just look absurd. According to your "Any CO2 bad!" theory (a theory that only you seem to push), you should stop breathing. That's because you don't understand scale.

    It's too bad you can't address what anyone actually believes.

    Sure you are. You want to make sure the world shivers in the dark when the fossil fuel runs out. All deniers hate renewable energy. It's part of what the cult demands them to believe, and none of them dare disagree with the cult.

    And I'm pointing out you're pushing a strawman. If you disagree, point to some authority, says the IPCC report, which says _all_ CO2 emissions must be eliminated. If you weren't just making everything up, that should be no problem.
     
  3. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    30,963
    Likes Received:
    28,434
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fascinating..... So, asking the ex-pres to be environmentally responsible is me asking for the stone age... Laughable. I just dig the transference though. Thinking that it's attack folks who ask the AGW faithful for being consistent... It's like, "how dare you", followed by the "rules are only for you people" approach and finished with a "because I said so".... Classic internalization of traditional religious dogma if there ever was one.
     
  4. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,776
    Likes Received:
    8,610
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes we have. The observed climate sensitivity to CO2 is ~ 1 deg C as noted in the IPCC AR5. And the economic analyses are not of one man but include 21 studies which identify and estimate the benefits and costs of global warming.
     
  5. _Inquisitor_

    _Inquisitor_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,542
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Thieves and crooks should be in jail.

    Mentally ill who represent danger to themselves and/or society should be treated in mental hospitals.

    If you support thieves and crooks, as you do, it may look Stalinish for you.

    It does not bother me.
     

Share This Page