Were Twin Towers felled by chemical blasts

Building a Better Mirage
NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up
of the Crime of the Century
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/

By truncating its investigation at "collapse initiation" NIST avoids having to consider and disclose the subsequent evidence of controlled demolition.

 

Throw a little jet fuel on your bonfire next time, and you will perhaps understand what highly flammable means. Give it up please.

 

Have you bothered to look at the design of the buildings???

Gravity is very predictable.. The towers weren't KNOCKED OVER.. they had their spine cut.

You are an amateur..

 

pffft So says the person passing of nist liars as experts.

NIST = Proven Liars.= No credibility.

 

Oh and Yes i have looked at the designs and the spine was not broken it merely had its shoulder ripped open.Hardly enough to cripple you.

You are an amatuer.

 

Oh I don't care what the NIST says.. I studied the work of the architect because he also designed the Dhahran airport and I know that the Ports Authority added many floors to his design compromising it..

I knew the buildings would collapse that terrible morning.. There was NO way they could sustain being hit by commercial airliners..

 

I also do not care how the buildings fell, that is a non issue as far as i am concerned.

The isssue is who was actually behind the attacks .

To that ,All roads lead to JEWS.

 

LOLOL.. Jews do NOT commit suicide for the cause. Wise up.

 

Well then what are Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen and all those
Truther's gonna do now.They will have to scramble around for
some conspiracy to overwhelm their already Truther conspiracy
as to how the whole Twin Towers was a scripted plot by Our
Government in league with both the CIA and Al Qaeda.
Kinda puts a damper on all those Truther hopes.

 

There were No Jews responsible for any of the highjacked
4 jetliners.They were ALL Young Muslin men.

 

30 tons each of aluminum that melted and then was blasted by the sprinkler system.

Interesting theory.

 

It was the accelerant, the materials in the building itself then caught fire and burned in what turned into a convection oven.

 

Strange. That 'convection oven' (also known as the Mandarin Hotel in China) seemed to endure the inferno just fine, and for an exponentially longer time frame.
Chemical intervention is the only way those buildings, and their core columns, fell about as fast as the victims who jumped out of the buildings (possibly even faster). Black smoke...starved oxygen fires. Controlled demolition is the only possible logical explanation.

 

Black smoke is NOT oxygen starved fires.......and I'll bet the mandarin wasn't hit by a big assed jet either and it's sprinkler system was intact

 

No...no plane...It just was fully engulfed for DAYS, much more intense the WTC's combined. There they stood though...burnt, but proudly standing. Down to the frame of the building. There it stood, for all to see (and to mock the idiots that believe the "official" BS story).

 

Wher were the holes from the jets?different construction

 

As usual, your 'facts' are nowhere near the truth.

Fully engulfed for days? The fire was put out in five hours.

The frame of the building was concrete, very different from steel framed buildings.

The reports of the blaze reported thick, black smoke. Still going to stick by your 'oxygen starved' argument?

 

Wrong on all accounts and the materials burning were made up of chemicals, plastics and organics. Since there was no demolitions your whole theory is a bunch of smoke, pun intended. Oh and the buildings did not collapse at same speed as the falling debris as any viewing of the them clearly shows and bedsides it was not occurring in a vacuum.

 

They do not need to , they use patsy arabs for those purposes.

Wise up.....

jews pretending to be crazy islamic clerics are bountiful.....remember the jew adam gherhart(i think that was his name) pretending to have converted to islam and calling for jihad against the west...where is he?What about the jews who threatened the south park writers while pretending to be redical mooslims....i could go on and on...

 

What about the jewish air traffic controller of 9/11 and egypt crash?coincidence?

What about the 60 jewish spies caught with top secret passes info that were at the airports where the planes took off and that was allowed to go back to israel?

What about the connections to the cia/mossad of atta and other so called mooslim terrorists?

What about the duel israeli citizens in the American government making billions from the 9/11 attacks, Soros being 1 of them?

Where are all the mooslims again did you say because every time you delve into these attacks a hell of a lot of jew heads pop up...lol

 

As usual, you ignore the obvious. Days, hours, whatever, my shill acquaintance.
The fact is, it burned much more intensely, hotter, and longer than did the WTC's, and it didn't even have vertical core columns to contend with! Somehow though, in the land of shillery, the WTC's are the exception to everything, special laws of physics, special BS. Not prior to 9/11, nor since, have steel framed buildings collapsed from fire. The plane hitting them is almost completely irrelevant. If the planes hit towards the base of the structures, you might be able to pass off the demolition as have been caused by the planes. What actually happened though, was that the near TOPS of the buildings were hit. If anything was going to fall, it would have fell over, fell non uniformly in some fashion. The base of the buildings supported little more additional weight than they had since the sixties, yet, on this day, they fell, and somehow managed to make the core columns disappear. How'd they do that? DEMOLITION. Plain and simple.
The nonsense put forth by the shills would be laughable if it weren't so treasonous.

 

I see, so little things like facts mean nothing to you.

 

From http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm

Your examples of other buildings to compare it to are apples and oranges.

From the same site.

Meeting all 7 tests would be a fair comparison.

And you really need to stop calling people who present you with facts you don't like shills. It detracts from your credibility. Refute the facts presented instead.

 

Shills are shills, and I'll call them as I see them.

You forgot to mention that we need to compare only pink buildings to other pink buildings, and only compare buildings that were constructed by short men versus tall men. We need to only compare structures that have the same number of alarm clocks in them to other structures with the same amount of alarm clocks inside. Also, only compare ones whose restrooms only had the same color paper towels and NOT to ones that used hand air dryers, use different brands of copy machines, have unequal amounts of number 2 pencils in them, or ones with a different amount of earthworms underneath its foundation.
Point is, the similarities are close enough for comparison, to any REASONABLE person.
Shills are not included amongst those REASONABLE people, because well, they're paid to oppose anything that is not "officially" reasonable.

Seriously man....apples and oranges? How do you sleep?

 

The similarities to you seem to be that they were both buildings,and ends there.