She had the right not to get pregnant in the first place. In fact she'd probably have the right to take preliminary measures immediately after she knows she may have gotten impregnated, just to be sure there's no pregnancy developing in there. You can't just keep brushing off the consequences of all your choices and keep asserting "I have the right".
You can't just keep brushing off the consequences of all your choices and keep asserting "I have the right". Example: If a woman suddenly gives birth in a park bathroom, she can't just walk away and absolve herself of all responsibility. The least she is required to do is take the baby to a hospital. Women have been prosecuted for giving birth on a toilet seat and leaving the baby there to drown. She has some minimum obligations. 99% of Pro-Choicers agree with this. The question is just when does she have responsibility.
The UNBORN...they have no rights. Have ya called the cops yet about all those "murders" ? Yes, it is anti-liberty to try to deny people the right to their own bodies. Nice cherry picked response Can't answer: Have ya called the cops yet about all those "murders" ?
I've always wondered why alcoholics and drug addicts don't try the "my body my choice" thing when they get pulled over.
Oooof! The only people I see thinking that way are the males complaing about women trapping them into childcare
It is thier choice of hitch is why alcohol is legal. Don’t fool yourself the only reason drugs are illegal is that it costs the government to treat the outcomes
Interesting. Yet all those people seeking elective (as opposed to medically necessary) abortions appear to be female.
Alcohol is a drug. Regardless, you're responsible for the outcomes of what you put in your body, be it alcohol or what puts you in an abortion clinic. Abortion on demand is simply people who want to make bad choices and not be responsible for them.
Good We, the women of the world now declare there will be no more sex. To ensure the continuance of the race all men will donate to sperm banks. To enforce the new “ no sex” rule all men will be castrated Think of all the unfinished jobs that will now be done
OK ANSWER the OFT ASKED BUT NEVER ANSWERED QUESTION THAT ANTI-CHOICERS DUCK: If the fetus does not belong to the woman it's in WHOSE IS IT? If it isn't "it's mother's body"" then all the more reason she can have it removed. NO one is obligated to sustain the life of anyone else.....YOU don't have to so why should pregnant women?????????????? If it isn't HER body then she should be able to take it out and let it grow n it's own....
Yes especially since in at least one case the young girl was forcibly restrained Just imagine this being replicated in every city in america
Human life is not property. Infants can't grow on their own they have to have support from an adult. Toddlers can't grow on their own they don't know how to forage or produce food. So that's a stupid criteria
Well ... sure, if you like. You do you. Meantime, the rest of us will just indulge in responsible fashion. Or marry someone who can provide for lotsa kids and go balls-out free for all.
It's like they can only see black and white. The infinite shades of grey betwixt are apparently invisible. Like toddlers, really.
And women can. Hence the need for responsibility when fertile. Besides, our friend argued that men are the only ones who object to having to raise a child they didn't want. The existence of non-medical abortion tells us that is utter bunkum