What does WOMEN's Rights actually mean?

Thanks for pointing out the snowball affect of the drastic conditions our society has to fund and unfortunately assimilate to because of these women and their reliance on big daddy government for everything. So lets go back to the genesis of these entitlement/wasteful programs. That would be Womens' Suffrage in a nutshell. There simply is no disputing the facts here. I'm not saying we should totally eliminate the female vote here, but I am saying our economy would greatly capitalize itself if we were to eliminate the female liberal vote entirely. Conservative women don't vote for this nonsense. I would also suggest eliminating the voting rights of anyone registering as a dye-in-the-wool liberal/marxist/socialist--whether they be male or female. Just looking out for America's best interests.

 

Why not just eliminate the liberal vote. Why the female liberal vote?

 

Didn't I just say that in my last response? Since this is a 'womens' forum' I thought it would be considerate of the moderating protocol to mention liberal women first. But you are correct, eliminating the entire liberal voting sector would certainly go a long way toward straightening out our government mess ups.

 

So why did you begin with women? Why not all liberals?

 

At the risk of repeating myself, women started the ball rolling with Womens' Suffrage as I pointed out earlier, and then lib men like FDR continued their assault on our economy with further social programs. Methinks you have enough female lib agitprop and social destruction to digest and deal with before taking on the entire lib faction. Remember, this is a womens forum, so I would appreciate it if you and others stick to the problems arising from the fairer and weaker lib sex for starters.

 

But you can't prove that, because it's false. Women's votes didn't change the programs which you protest.

 

Oh excuse me for my stupidity, it surely must have been all those WHITE CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN MALES that voted in all those social welfare programs. How could I have been so myopic?

 

Or liberals in general. You're blaming women for the things you dislike about liberal policy. I'm not getting the connection.

Can I blame 9-11 on males?

 

Yes, because most of those liberal policies were created for the benefit of statist liberal women. So it comes as no surprise that its those liberal women who vote for enactment or further funding for those programs. There's plenty of blame for liberal men as well, but for now, let's concentrate on the liberal woman's drain on our society.

Yes you can, but you might want to get a bit more specific by blaming 9/11 on male-oriented Islamic/Jihadism Radicalism.

 

How is the liberal woman's "drain" any different from the liberal man's?

Or I can be like you and simply blame men?

 

It isn't so I'm done playing these kindergarten games with you.

.

How am I simply blaming men? I haven't seen or heard about too many female Islamic terrorists lately, but when I do I'll be sure to point them out to you. You see, I blame the liberal men when I find it appropriate to do so. Right now, and for this womens forum, I have decided to point out how liberal women have also wreaked havoc on the American economy. What's so difficult to understand about this?

 

women have evolved a lot more since the beginning of time coz of the rubbish position they have been (and lots of 'm still are sadly enough) in; men weren't the ones wanting and needing changes coz of their comfortable position so please don't come here post your sad story about how "women have wreaked havoc on the american economy" coz those changes were long overdue.

whilst saying that, you seem to forget 95% of the board rooms are filled with men; go look for some answers there with regards to the state of the american economy.

 

No one is saying that women haven't come a long way since Eve betrayed mankind over 2000 years ago. What I repeatedly try to convey here is that these social/welfare programs that are draining our economy are a result mostly of the liberal female vote. Real men, as were our founders, did quite well without the drain of lib women voting or lib women participating in the political process. The nature of these social/welfare programs are meant to further erode and diminish any and all self reliance/respect of the people as a whole. We can thank the lib women vote for our current socialist nanny state. Liberal men are just as bad as women, but for now, we should try our best to suppress the lib female vote at every opportunity, and by any and all means possible.

You and other libs here continue to whine about the perceived injustices of females; yet with your whining comes a bevy of govt run and govt controlled financially bankrupt programs aimed at destroying capitalism in lieu of ushering in hardcore socialism. You lib women sure do have a lot to be proud of...NOT! Heck, you lib female mothers were so proud of the fact that you became enlightened by working jobs that normally men had; yet you couldn't do it without having the nanny state fund your workplace with babysitting centers. Then you needed to have paid leaves of abscenses for sick time and for prego time off from the grueling grind. And the socialist scheme goes on and on and on at the taxpayers expense.

 

I wouldn't go as far as to say women shouldn't be able to vote. The disparity is not a massive one, and in my opinion our problem is uninformed voters of both genders. I wouldn't be surprised if the disparity could be attributed not to some type of genetic personality difference, but to the fact that men are more likely to follow politics which could for whatever reason be why they vote the way they do.

Everything else I agree 100%. Quotas and double standards are flat out wrong in any instance.

 

You have no more authority to decide what's overdue than anyone does.

 

you think i'm whining? honestly? maybe i'm just discussing things and your blurred vision, "thanks" to your 3 wonderful ex-wives, does not allow you to think of women in any other way than whiners.

well sorry women have to have the babies in nature's system. and i'm sorry for the fact that real men would not be born if it weren't for those prego women.
women drawing off the system coz guys can't keep their pants closed; you seem to forget about that. if those real men would work and provide for their offspring, a huge percentage of the women drawing off the system would not have to rely on that system.

you know you are talking rubbish, you know it. and we can all see your rhetoric comes from the sour grapes you're having due to YOUR bad choices in life; take responsibility for your own mistakes and don't blame 51% of the population.

 

He's not referring to women who utilize social programs, he's referring to liberal women who vote to enact those programs. They aren't necessarily prego themselves.

 

thanks, but at the end of the day they are the users of those programs.

and i was only commenting in general on his extremely rubbish comment about prego women.

 

They may or may not be users of those programs, I'm just pointing out that his point was an entirely different one.

He's not mad at women for being prego, he's mad at the people who vote for candidates who allow them to have children that they can't afford and putting the cost of these children onto the taxpayers.

 

Thanks Sam, but it still remains like an act of pulling teeth to get one's point across to these one-way libbers.

 

what is anyone supposed to understand when someone posts this:

yet you couldn't do it without having the nanny state fund your workplace with babysitting centers. Then you needed to have paid leaves of abscenses for sick time and for prego time off from the grueling grind

so whenever men can have babies and will need the same support from the state coz the one who got them pregant took off and he can't cope on one salary and needs a daycare center, you come back to me.

FYI: i am ALL in favour of ppl fending for themselves. i have never taken one cent from the state and have funded and am still funding the state big time with my tax money.
i am not at all in favour of women making babies like girls do in the UK, just to get an apartment and basically a free ride for life funded by the tax payers.

but i do not agree with those sour grapes of libhater just coz he made some bad decisions in life. his vision is blurred and he chucked a lot of issues in the same pot and basically blames women for a big range of problems.

it's not that black and white at all.

 

Thanks for reminding me; women have also used affirmative action and quota systems to further their partisan agendas.

I see you've resorted to ragtime talk. I don't need to go into the long list of so-called hardships that men face everyday in the workforce so as to address your whiny and emotional pleas for women. Men have learned to zuck-it-up by facing life head-on without the succor of govt run agencies and all of their liberally-oriented affiliates.

Perhaps my message here of the female being disproportionately government sponsored is paying off, but then again, I've learned the hard way that what a liberal says is almost always different then their actions.

What are you talking about...sour grapes and bad decisions? My most favorable decisions were divorcing those 3 libs, and I have worn a perpetual smile on my Conservative face ever since.

 

libhater: i stopped reading when i arrived in the middle of your little story. sorry but your rant is now so boring plus i noticed you don't read my comments so i just lost interest.

i know a few men like you: 50y old guys, would love to have a 20yo girlfriend but are not rich enough and too ugly to pull it off, hate women in general and have an attitude that basically stinks and you don't always know what came first, the stinking attitude or getting hitched to dodgy women who turned them into dodgy men with rotten attitutdes. in some cases i can understand where their frustration comes from but most of the time it's them blaming women for their misfortune when we are all the master of our own destiny.

i don't wanna get all personal but man, if you're like this in your relationships, let's say it's not a surprise wife number 4's on her way...........

 

And so he wants to strip women of the vote; sounds fair..

 

that's the only way his kind can survive.