What if? What if Obama is preparing us for Islamic takeover?

I know this sounds faaaar-fetched, but I've felt this impression twice before and now, again. I think that's enough reason to start this thread.

It should be a place where you and I can present info as we happen upon it. Info, of course, that pertains to the question of what if Obama is getting us ready for Islamic takeover.

This idea assumes Obama was chosen for this task many years ago (that's why his history is so obscured from examination) by Islamists and okay'ed by Black radicals in cooperation with them, and he's now executing a plan to weaken America in preparation for Islamic infiltration toward the goal of eventual takeover.

A real life Manchurian Candidate.

I don't assert it is a reality, just that I get the feeling sometimes that this might possibly be possible given the evidence I've seen in the past and plan to present here over time.

Join in or lurk, as you wish.

 

Russia says use of force against Iran ‘unacceptable'

http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...ys-use-force-against-iran-unacceptable-9.html

See my post in that thread, #90.

Obama has allowed things to get to the point where Russia felt 'comfortable' enough to commit to a violent response to prevent the USA from defending Israel against Iranian nukes.

"Is it worth the risk of nuclear war with Russia to defend those Joooz?"

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-presence-in-persian-gulf-to-1-due-to-budget/

 

Budget cuts force the Pentagon to cut the preferred carrier strike group strength in half. Could this give Iran a slight, but crucial, edge in the early stages of a military engagement with the West? Or, would this development, in concert with Russia's declaration that any attack on Iran would be "unacceptable," be the excuse Obama would need to do nothing while Iran eventually went nuke and destroyed Israel?

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/clowardpiven_government.html

The Cloward-Piven strategy was created in the mid 1960's by two Marxist Columbia Universty professors and is designed to financially ruin the United States. Barack Obama studied this strategy and implemented and helped implement this strategy throughout his legal career until present.

The logical result of this could be a crippled Great Satan with a high tax rate which could go toward paying a Jizya tax should one be levied.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...minees-second-rate-people.html#post1062272112

The link above will take you to my thread dealing with former V.P. Dick Cheney's comments about Pres. Obama's administration nominees which Cheney said were "second rate people."

I doubt he was impugning their character as much as their abilities, accomplshments and/or resumes.

And to back up Cheney's assessment you can refer to fmr. Sen. Chuck Hagel's admission of being unprepared for the job of Sec. of Defense during his Senate Confrmation hearings.

Now, as smart and as crafty as Obama is or is supposed to be, why would he nominate people who were sub-standard in ability?

I suggest it's because he might want people in key postions, during times of crisis, who he can count on to screw up, or those he can influence to do the President's bidding.

What type of crisis would Obama anticipate needing/wanting incompetents at the wheel?

How about an attack by Iran on Israel which we might or might not respond to in light of the Russian's warning, listed above.

 

I would think the fact that nobody is responding to this thread, even in the conspiracy section, should tell you it's a whacky idea

 

To give credence to the maunderings of one of the worst vice presidents of our times kind of strengthens the idea that this all came out of a tin foil package that somebody left in the latrine.

 

Whacky is what a young lad does to his Tally Whacker. An idea you think silly is wacky.

And if you now have or have ever had a dog, you know they will sometimes alert you to things you, yourself cannot see, hear or smell. And sometimes the warning is about a squirrel or another dog or maybe a cat or something else oif little consequence outside your door.

But sometimes the warning is for something you should be concerned with but because you can't see it in the dark of night or refuse to get up off the sofa to investigate whatever is causing Rover to bark, you casually disregard his warning.

That's your prerogative.

As I said in the OP, this may be faaar fetched, but as I run across pieces that might be useful in helping to see a larger picture I intend to post them here. Maybe it will be a bunch of nothing. Like a passing squirrel under the window. But it might eventually turn out to be a developing picture of a real danger creeping across our land and under our noses that we won't even bother to investigate.

I know some of you lack experience and chronological maturity, so I won't expect some of you to recognize any danger before it happens. But there are others here who are older and wiser who will be able to accurately assess the signs if they were to reveal a clear pattern of treachery by the President.

At least I hope they will be able to recognize the danger signs in time to take timely action because BHO is very smart and he's an adept manipulator and liar extraordinaire, so he might be able to avoid suspicion by the general public until it's too late.

It's my hope that I am wrong. But just in case I intend to act as the faithful ol' dog who stands (or lies down) as a silent sentry.

I'm content to compile the 'evidence' and IF it starts to look real and/or really threatening then we can discuss the usefulness or accuracy of this thread.

 

I had to look it up. Good for you!

maundering present participle of maun·der
(Verb)

Talk in a rambling manner.

Move or act in a dreamy or idle manner

 

It is a plot by Martian Freemasons. American rightists are WEIRD!

 

To stop by to do nothing but leave a pile of forum feces speaks volumes of you.

 

Your mind, lad! What on earth is the weirdness in your head here then?

 

yea, whacky was the wrong term. completely detached from reality fits better.

 

Your posts are the weirdness in my thread.

 

To be fair....if that is what he did, he just added it to the initial pile.

 

Well they would be, wouldn't they, Napoleon?

 

I suppose it's possible for you to experience an epiphany and convert to anything but your current orientation.

So, no it needn't be weird at all.

 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ct-govt-welfare-as-a-jihad-seekers-allowance/

No, the person advocating this strategy IS NOT Barack Obama, but one could easily imagine this 'cleric' getting the idea of Jihadists in the US getting sustenance from the US government (actually from the taxpayers) and simultaneously helping swell the welfare roles which is expected to bring down our entire economy (Cloward-Piven's strategy) from Barack Obama.

Obama's a sly guy.

Stay tuned to this thread for future indications that suggest Obama is readying the US for Islamic conquest.

And if you run across clues of your own, list them here.

 

But one meaning you.

LOL

"Islamic conquest"

LOL

 

www.investigativeproject.org/3885/steve-emerson-on-fox-business-with-lou-dobbs

 

www.dailycaller.com/2013/02/26/on-a...nnity-and-democratic-rep-keith-ellison-video/

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) is a Muslim and never before have I seen or heard him so stridently defend Obama. You can say he was acting as any loyal Democrat would, but, his defense also indicates Islamic represntatives are no longer hesitant to defend Obama publicly and in a spotlight of controversy.

Just one more piece of a giant, complex puzzle.

 

The Muslim Brotherhood is an international movement. The goal of which is to create an Islamic state universally all over the world.

From Nathan Garrett in the film, Grand Deception.

www.investigativeproject.org/3873/fox-news-showcases-emerson-new-documentary-jihad

 

I love seeing somebody give that little piece of crap Hannity some of what he and his Fox Boobs buddies have been giving Democrats for the last twenty years. He needs his karma leveled.

 

If Bush's deficit was "unpatriotic" what is Obama's deficit now that he's more than tripled the Bush deficit?

www.americaswatchtower.com/2011/08/...c-for-adding-4-trillion-to-the-national-debt/

Keith Ellison couldn't answer THAT question so he filibustered Hannity.