What is your theory on why the USA has not been to the moon in the past 40 years?

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Clint Torres, Jul 7, 2011.

  1. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing in any of your posts challenges it.

    There are many reasons we know it.

    They transmitted video and audio the entire way there and back which was triangulated and determined the position of the source.

    You cannot fake that.

    The rocks were specific to the moon proven so and that cannot be faked.

    Thousands of people cannot keep such a secret.

    Those are all facts you have never challenged in any way
     
  2. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,374
    Likes Received:
    36,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    not only were the trips to the moon very costly, the costs did not return profits to the military industrial complex as much as war ventures do
     
  3. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    There are no anomalies. There are only spammers like you who ignore all tough questions. Your weasel reply once again ignores my point that your article concludes with a provable lie. I find it disgusting that you claim to be a "truth seeker" yet have no problem citing falsehoods to support your hogwash.

    Your lack of knowledge on the subject never ceases to amaze me. Because you personally have a useless understanding of orbital mechanics, you claim everybody has. When the orbiting spacecraft follows a visible trajectory, is tracked by every single geek with an interest and photographed by 3rd party enthusiasts and leaves orbit with a visible burn, we most certainly have more than second hand info!

    You are a known liar.

    An issue that once again you have no idea about. Once again we fall back to your spam claims about one mission and a flag. A situation that I have repeatedly proved could not possible support your conclusion.
     
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,860
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    That may turn out to be true but that doesn't prove there were people in the craft. I made it clear that they might have sent unmanned robotic craft all the way to the moon to orbit it to fool those people.


    You're avoiding the issue of whether the US government is a known liar. Do you base all of your opinions on what you read in the mainstream US press? Tell us what you think about the extent of the lies we are told. Do you think they only lie a little about little things? Do you think they lie a lot about serious things?


    I insist that this info proves they were in a studio and you insist you've proven that to be wrong.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/362999-air-caused-flag-move-so-obviously-studio.html


    Here's a video I wish I'd put in post #1 of the above thread.

    Initial Apollo 15 Flag Movement
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW9qcL4LiUg


    The viewers should look at it and decide for themselves. Hey viewers - make sure you look at post #12.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've decided...your wild fantasies of nonexistent 'anomalies' are worthless.

    Ultra-fail
     
  6. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Answer to OP thread title . . .

    Been there, done that?? [​IMG]
     
  7. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still trying to open closed minds then, Scott? Keep at it mate - remember, you've got me on-side. :thumbsup: [​IMG]
     
  8. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    BREAKING NEWS FR0M OUTER SPACE. BEGINS:

    THE MARS LANDER GIZMO HAS AT LAST FOUND SIGNS OF LIFE ON THE RED PLANET. PROVIDED NASA KEEPS THE FUNDING GOING WE SHALL USE IT TO ANALYSE THE FIND, BUT IT COULD TAKE SOME TIME - SAY 5 YEARS, OR IF WE CAN STRETCH IT OUT A BIT, 10 YEARS. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THIS STARTLING DISCOVERY ARE BEGINNING TO ARRIVE FROM THE FAR REACHES OF THE GALAXY EVEN AS WE PUBLISH THIS BULLETIN, AND FOR THE SAKE OF DOUBTERS (NO NAMES, NO PACK-DRILL BUT SCOTT AND CERBERUS WILL KNOW WHO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT) BELOW IS THE VERY FIRST PHOTO TO BE RECEIVED:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  9. perdidochas

    perdidochas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,303
    Likes Received:
    4,334
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That, or why would they have stopped faking it? By now, we could have fake moon colonies.
     
  10. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Republicans. They have absolutely no vision. With the moon as a launch site, we could have been well on our way to Mars by now. Instead, we get SpaceX and parts scattered all over the Mojave.
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ahhh,no,bean counters are non partisan
     
  12. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How '2001: A Space Odyssey' would that be! Dan Dare, eat your heart out!! :mrgreen:
     
  13. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Anything NASA can do the private sector can do better and cheaper" is not exactly non-partisan.
     
  14. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Shuttle was just a compromise. We shoulda been firmly on the moon by now with missiles 1/6th the size of the Saturn V aimed at Mars.
     
  15. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I hate to be a party pooper, but how exactly does one get all that mass and technology up there, landed and ready to use. It is science fiction to suggest the \moon is anything but a dead rock I'm afraid. Cost to get anything significant up there and landed is dollar prohibitive. As a very direct example, look at the size of the rocket to get a small lunar module landed.
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll: whoosh!
     
  17. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG] Good idea - zap Mars and we won't hear any more about it. [​IMG] Then all we need is for the 'cosmologists' to discover 'how the universe works' ([​IMG]) and we won't hear any more about that, either. But if they did that they'd lose their jobs-for-life, so I think that might taken them a bit longer. [​IMG]
     
  18. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    579
    Trophy Points:
    83
    We need a better and faster method of traveling planet to planet and NASA is actually working on a REAL Warp Drive.

    Everyone involved in the Warp Drive Program has had to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements and it looks like they just might have something.

    If we can change the current time it takes us to go to Mars from at minimum 18 months to under 3 weeks....there will be Manned Space Exploration of all rocky planets and moons.

    AboveAlpha
     
  19. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is your favourite genre of films sci-fi by any chance, AA? [​IMG]
     
  20. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    579
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You think I am kidding right?

    Run a search....NASA WARP DRIVE.

    You will see I am not kidding.

    The Warp Drive Program is being run by a Dr. White.

    AboveAlpha
     
  21. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And la luna comparatively speaking is within spitting distance. Imagine the logistics of getting loads of stuff to Mars.
     
  22. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    579
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That's why it's so important to find a different way of Space Travel that can cut down travel time to weeks instead of years.

    It's highly likely that in the not so distant future that Human's begin Tera-Forming Mars.

    All we would have to do to start is Genetically Engineer Plats that can deal with the harsh environment....and change all that CO2 into Oxygen.

    One problem is that Mars no longer has a protective EM-Field like Earth still has as Mars lost it's EM-Field when the inner core of Mars cooled down to a point where the Liquid Metal Core stopped sinning thus it no longer generates a protective EM-Field.

    The loss of Mars' EM-Field is what caused the loss of the Martian Oceans as Cosmic Rays and UV-Radiation from our Sun split water into Hydrogen and Oxygen Gases on Mars and this was lost into Space over the Eons.

    AboveAlpha
     
  23. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think you should be a PR wonk for NASA, AA. They'd welcome you with open arms. You've almost got me convinced! :smile:
     
  24. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    579
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I am not kidding.

    Run a search.

    AboveAlpha
     
  25. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're going to need something really really massive to get it off the earth directly onto Mars. From the Earth to the moon could be done in numerous steps, Then it would be onto Mars. A Saturn V from the Moon would give you roughly 6x the advantage as from Earth.
     

Share This Page