What Republican could possibly run for President next?

I voted for Gary Johnson.

 

Romney has been proven correct on most everything he said and predicted, and Obama has lied, lied, and still lies!

 

The republican, who could win, must be he who unites the women, those who hate Child Abuse.

These women can sees that sexual promiscuity in America now creates half the fatherless bastards born today. They suffer before they become the Criminal Element themselves:


Statistics on Fatherlessness
CHILDREN NEED BOTH PARENTS
(*)
It’s a Fact
Here’s why:

63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. (Source: U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census).

90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.

85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes.
(Source: Center for Disease Control).

80% of rapist motivated by displaced anger come from fatherless homes. (Source:
Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 14, pp. 403-26).

71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. (Source: National Principals Assoc. Report on the State of High Schools).

85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. (Source: Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. Of Corrections, 1992).

These statistics translate to mean that children from fatherless homes are:

5 times more likely to commit suicide
32 times more likely to run away
20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders
14 times more likely to commit rape
9 times more likely to drop out of high school
20 times more likely to end up in prison

Children from "fatherless families of single mother" homes are*:
(*)
• 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders
• 4.6 times more likely to commit suicide
• 6.6 times more likely to become teenaged mothers
• 24.3 times more likely to run away
• 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders
• 6.3 times more likely to be in a state-operated institutions
• 10.8 times more likely to commit rape
• 6.6 times more likely to drop out of school
• 15.3 times more likely to end up in prison while a teenage
• 73% of adolescent murderers come from mother only homes
•(*) 6.3 times more likely to be in state operated institutions
(*)

Daughters who live in mother only homes are 92% more likely to divorce**

 

Santorum could do the job if he would use the truth and the Facts to attack the Gays and the feminists and show what they have created for the America we see now, after their sexual Revolution of 1960:

This would be his only message and it would galvanize the good mothers and married women who have lost control over their single unmarried and wanton daughters.

 

Even if you actually believe that, persisting in whining about the President is a futile self-indulgence since he is highly unlikely to seek a third term.

The fractured and fractious GOP could do far worse than resign themselves to "Individual Mandate" Willard again, but the Dixiecan faction would howl like a falsetto full mooner passing the Star of India kidney stone.

Mississppi TP rage is spreading, and the Angry Whit Guys are quite pissy over being repeatedly manhandled by the Turdblossom.

 

Perhaps the GOP should nominate Romney again. lol

 

Go, Rooster!

 

Ok, now

Let's be clear here, you're stating as far as qualifications, experience, history of accomplishment and leadership you found not much difference between Romney and Obama?

What would make a "top-of-the-barrel" candidate as opposed to Romney?

- - - Updated - - -

He'd certainly make a better President than the only candidate the Democrats have to offer.

 

If he was treated fairly by the MSM, he would win in a landslide!

 

Of course I believe what I posted! Prove me wrong.

 

poor widdle Mitt. For being the bellicose party, the GOP sure knows how to whine like girliemen, that's for sure.

 

Just telling the truth as I see it, but you obviously have trouble with the truth. It's so typical of a lib to demean someone rather than prove him wrong.

 

Why does that sound so familiar...............oh yeah:

[video=youtube;nBQvXZSnua4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBQvXZSnua4[/video]

 

PROVE to you that the MSM did not cause the defeat of Romney? How would I do that? How would you prove that it did? You can't, of course. Here's a hint:

Romney got beat because, on election day, a lot more folks voted for Obama than voted for him. THAT I CAN prove.

 

I'm not interested in trashing your articles of faith. I'd much rather see Willard as the GOP nominee again.

Then you could get excited about yet another Romney Landslide!

Now, that was fun!

 

If the chronic bellywhingers need to blame their old amorphous scapegoat "the media" for Willard's having been so easily vanquished, why were so many of them giddy on the eve of the election and predicting his triumph in a "landslide"?

Was it that sudden, last minute revelation by "the media" concerning his keeping reptiles in his basement for immoral purposes that seized the headlines and network news on the evening of 5 November 2012?

 

It the media bias for Obama and against Romney was not self evident to you, if you never read any of the follow up studies as to favorable and unfavorable coverage then you knowledge is sorely lacking. The Crowley debate only cost him plenty. Remember the harping on the dog in the crate nonsense, the giving the fellow student a chinese haircut as we called it in my day. The total misrepresentation of the "47%" thing. The collusion of his tax records and rather than attack Reid for his lies about Romney's tax returns their giving it credence? All that went right by you?

I don't know who was predicting a landslide especially that night. But once again we found that polling has gotten very difficult these days with trying to get accurate responses let alone an accurate cross-section and then accurately interpreting it a big challenge.

 

Common sense proves me correct re the MSM and their sponsored debates. They certainly covered for Obama. I never said there were not other factors such as Obama's lies about Benghazi and Obamacare. If Romney ran against Obama now, Romney would win. Cheating and lying is what puts the dimocrats into office.

 

Reportage did not censor such matters in most legitimate news outlets, but neither did they dwell on them. If anyone craved the expurgated version of Willard, you could always swallow the fetid offal about the President spewed up relentlessly by Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Ann Coulter, Michael Reagan, Neal Boortz, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, G Gordon Liddy, Hugh Hewitt, Dana Loesch, Kevin Jackson, Dennis Prager, Monica Crowley, Sarah Palin, Byron York, Elizabeth Hasslebeck, Charles Krauthammer, Mike Huckabee, Michael Medved, George Will, Paul Gigot, countless rightwing blogs, etc., etc., etc.

Since no one that I know of has suggested that the delusional "Romney Landslide" was actually being perpetrated as the returns that came in made it go "Poof!", I assume you're referring to the fantasy afoot as The Blaze was reporting on the "big names" that were calling the "Romney Landslide!" as late as November 4 (although Turdblossom's denialist panic attack on network tv as the numbers came in was precious!) Romney Landslide: Here Are the Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen[/url].


Needless to say, the "main stream media" was to be found in the real world, and forecasters such as Nate Silver had nailed it long before.

.

 

Yes, you hate America's President and will mewl irrationally and incessantly. Got it.

 

They obsessed with them. Repeating them over and over as fact and as some evidence of his being unsuited to be President.

Give me a linkRomney Landslide: Here Are the Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen[/url].


Needless to say, the "main stream media" was to be found in the real world, and forecasters such as Nate Silver had nailed it long before.

.[/QUOTE]

And again that night the race was known to be close. Yes it appeared a Romney victory was on hand the weeks before but Obama closed the gap and once again the polling proved inaccurate as we have been finding the last few years.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes all you seem to have here is assigning an emotion to the other person..........really lame.

 

I hate what he has done and is doing to our country!

 

That's not true, of course, but you'll believe what you want to believe. Obama supporters rail against all the birther bushwa, the madrasa indoctrination nonsense,, the covert socialist agenda, etc. Willard's fans become verklempt over the reports of his inducing terror in the family dog, his concealing years of tax returns, or the exposure of his candid words to supporters he'd obviously rather not have had exposed: "There are 47% of the people who will vote for the president no matter what ... who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims. ... These are people who pay no income tax. ... and so my job is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

Of course, the upset over perceived outrages of the victorious camp fade, even as those of the vanquished fester. So it is, ever was, and ever shall be.

Perhaps it was because I had eschewed wishful thinking and chose fortuitously in preferring the astute Nate Silver's methodology that I had long anticipated Obama's easy victory over Romney, 332 to 206, so the aberration of so many high profile partisan prognosticators actually deluding themselves into expecting what The Blaze giddily proclaimed an imminent "Romney Landslide" on the eve of the election appeared especially ludicrous.

Needless to say, the result speaks for itself.


.

 

I would guess that after Americans rejected a wealthy white male elitist once they'd probably do it again but what else to the Republicans have to offer? No Republican today represents the interests of minorities or the poor in America so who's really left to vote for them?

 

By the end of eight years of the Bush regime's policies, the Clinton surplus had been squandered, the economy had collapsed, and the nation was mired in his two obscenely-expensive nation-building fiascoes. So, you hate his successor's not cleaning up that mess more expeditiously.

Many rational folks would share your criticism, but not your seething, irrational, obsessive, personal animus.