What type of law is more likely to decrease violent crime

True, Rights are for private citizens, Law Enforcement and Military personnel, are covered by color of Authority, vested by being sworn in, Military or as a Peace Officer.

As far as machine guns, law enforcement has access to them as part of Authority and power, not as a Right, Private Citizens really have a Right to machine guns without infringement.

 

Of course.
But then, trollings aren't supposed to reflect reality,

 

Ending the Immigration Act of 1965, ending chain migration, ending immigration lotteries, revoking the seven amnesties that were passed by Congress, stop calling children born on U.S. soil of illegal alien parents citizen because anchor babies aren't American citizens and reinstating the Immigration Act of 1924 would cut violent crime in America by over 50%.

 

You are on the wrong forum. This is the gun control forum

 

Immigration Act of 1924 was an incredibly racist and bigoted law.

 

Do you have statistics from a reliable source to back your statement? Also wondering why you feel a need to use larger type then others? Do you feel that what you have to say is more important then the rest of us?

How so?

 

If 50% of gang members are illegal aliens and many are anchor babies.

If we look at who have committed most of the jihadist terrorist attacks on U.S. Soil.

It would seem that better enforcement of our immigration laws and changing our PC immigration policies that are in affect today that only are good for the immigrant and one particular political party would significantly cut violent crimes in America than any gun control laws that only affect law abiding citizens.

 

What the **** are you talking about ?

If you are referring the quote of the thread title I have no control over what sizes of the font is.

 

It sure worked well for 42 years.

If it wasn't broken why try to fix it ?

That's right, CPUSA.

 

I'm sorry I thought it was clear what I was talking about.

First I asked if you had statistics from a reliable source to back up your statement at #253.

Second I was wondering why you were using larger font than everyone else. Not sure how you quoted it but if you look your post has large font than the rest of the postings. Or, maybe not larger, maybe just all in bold type. Just felt like you were yelling at everyone.I obviously made an unfair assumption that you had done it intentionally. If that is not the case then you have my apology.

Rich

 

Have no freaking idea what you are talking about, all my post show up on my screen just like every ones else post in the standard #5 font side. That seems to be the standard font size everyone uses.

If you are making a point loudly or yelling at some someone, YOU USE ALL UPPER CASE LETTERS. Font size doesn't matter.

 

And I did apologize:

So, again, I apologize.

But you still haven't answered my question. Where do you get your information to support your claim of cutting violent crime by 50%.