Whats your opinion on the legality of Porn and Prostitution?

That is true, see it is like I have stated in Post #50. I am not as uneducated as others pretend to think, I say things that people know are true, it is just that their own selfish interests are at stake, so they defend what is at stake. Such opposition to truth is only seen in evil places.

 

I never said that. I do not accept force, only in cases of true self-defense which is not really force. Far be it from me to use anything to force opinions, facts, or beliefs, I am not a Crusader. Do not allow the picture of Tsar Nicoli II fool you,I have his picture as my current avatar because he and his immediate family were viciously murdered by an evil cult that financed another evil cult and caused millions of innocents to suffer for seventy-four years, this is the sin of those people who need to be driven out from among others, including out of these United States.

 

Brothels is quite different than the broad topic of legalize prostitution. I would not have much opposition to a redlight district brothel. A per

How does making it legal make it safer? Outlawing disease and violence?

The repercussions of legalization are huge.

 

Sex sells and always have and always will regardless of what the puritans or Victorians try to tell you. Both legal.

 

It amazes me now people will have diametrically opposite views and rationalizations to suit the conclusions they want to reach.

How many men such as O'Reilly and now dozens more have been cursed and condemned because it was alleged that suggesting sex is necessary for employment or advancement as unthinkably evil - while now on this thread are literally claiming that making sex as a job requirement should be fully legalized? That is what legalizing prostitution is, isn't it?

You want to work for O'Reilly? If prostitution is legal he can outright make having sex with him - or anyone else he want you to - as part of your job duties. That's what legalized prostitution is. Why should the youngest, most attractive woman most willing to commit the most sex acts with the boss NOT get the job - and when he tires of her just replace her with a new young beauty? Of course, she would have her other job duties as well.

What's new about having sex with the boss anyway? Why not make it legal to make having sex part of employment job duties? It works that way in nearly all 3rd world countries. Of course, if a woman got older the boss could give her the option of replacing her OR getting her daughter to have sex with him - deducting part of the mother's pay to give to the daughter.

IF legalized prostitution is correct, then making sex part of any job as a job duty also should be legal - and if requiring sex as a prostitution employment clause is legal, then certainly sexual harassment being allowed a job duty certainly can be legal too.

Isn't that how jobs should be determined anyway? Who is MOST willing to sell their body and do the best sex acts gets the job? This would work GREAT for sales too. Part of a woman's job duties would be to have sex with potential customers and clients.

Since most men want YOUNG women, there could be a career in jobs for which sex is part of the job duty areas for every cute girl graduating from high school. If she goes to get her masters degree instead she might be too old to get a good job.

It is stunning no one sees the hypocrisy in claiming employment contracts including for sex should be legal, but making sex an condition of employment should be illegal - when both are EXACTLY the same. BOTH are prostitution. Its illegal because the prostitute also has to answer the phone or maintain a customer accounts file too?

 

On the topic of sexual harassment, most cases are bogus, that is for sure, on another aspect of sexual harassment, many cops, it is a large number, have sexual relations with people they detain and/or arrest. I guess the arrestees, "feel obligated" to comply. In NYC, two of their slugs, raped a female in the back of their van and were exonerated because they said the woman or girl did it with consent. Imagine that, you are a female or even a male and a cop rapes you, but it is ruled that you had consensual sex. source:https://nypost.com/2017/10/30/nypd-cops-plead-not-guilty-to-rape-charges/
source:https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertsama...e-she-had-no?utm_term=.ou7ZJ06Bz2#.btN2xOD1WE
source: http://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...le-allowing-police-to-have-sex-with-people-in
Babylon the Great has fallen, she IS a habitation of Devils, a hold for every foul spirit(ideology) and a cage for every unclean and hateful bird.

 

So O'Reilly making promoting women conditioned upon her having sex with him should be entirely legal, correct?

 

WHAT MORALITY?

 

Brothels, prostitutes, street walkers and escorts are all different topics.

Hiring a prostitute is a one-night-stand with a stranger, isn't it? I am confident you have NOTHING to back up your claim that a person is more likely to get an STD from a pickup than a prostitute. The percentage of prostitutes with HIV is huge, nor is it the only communicable disease.

 

touche lol

 

You certainly have a way of twisting the facts, what one says, around. Prostitution being legal has nothing to do with O'Reilly or with promotions. That is unless one lives in Nevada and the gal is really, really good at it. Then she might get a promotion.

Your question is totally irrelevant to the subject. Twist and turn and try to make something that isn't there into something that wasn't just to suit your needs.

 

It isn't irrelevant at all. Prostitution is contract employment including sex.

I notice how when the practical applications of legalized prostitution is actually given real application, it seems everyone runs back to trying to claim they only mean brothels. If so, then the polls and topic should be limited to brothels, which it is not nor are responses limited to government regulated brothels.

If the topic is only government regulated brothels, even if nationwide 90+% of prostitution would still not be in government brothels.

The question is, rather, legalizing employment contracts for sex. If O'Reilly told a woman "I will hire you if you have sex with me" that is an employment contact that includes sex, i.e. prostitution, which most on this thread claim should be legal.

It is absurd to claim it should be legal to hire someone for sex, but illegal to hire someone for sex and answering the phone.

 

You're reading things into it that isn't there.

 

Connecting strings, conversations, themes and posts . . .
Anton Chaitkin


Stop, listen and learn, then question why you support what you support and the motivations behind what it is that you actually support.
I was listening to British Blokes and during the course of their conversation, they mentioned Anton Chaitkin so I gave him a listen to see if there was any relative connection with my reason and thinking. Surprise surprise, there is. The quest for truth and further learning brings about strange bedfellowing.

 

No one is paying for aids. WTF is wrong with you?

 

Leave people alone, if someone wants to sell their body be it for sex or to sell organs, then that's their business.

 

Given that you don't believe that women have free will (they are victims regardless of whether they considers themselves to be victims) it seems that you are the pot calling the kettle black.

That ought to be up to each jurisdiction. In some places where prostitution is legal, it is not allowed on the streets. You would throw the baby out with the bathwater.

 

Again showing that you don't think that women can own their body and decide what to do with it.

By your (faulty) logic, forcing people into the military to go fight and die would be 100% legitimate. Forcing men and women to clean up radioactive waste from meltdowns would also be legitimate (ala Fukushima.) Or to be a subject for drug trials.

It's really a simple matter of not making welfare contingent upon jobs that require one to engage in acts that one deems to be immoral.

 

Prostitution is two things. Free trade and sex. Which of those things are you against?

 

The sex lives of consenting adults is not the business of ANYONE but them.

 

both legal. What two people do and pay each other for privately that affects only them is their business. The fuzzy area foe me though is when a guy bangs a tute then spreads disease to his unsuspecting wife. But I guess smoking does the same thing and no one cares.

 

Prostitution is illegal but Escorts are legal.
Porno is legal if everyone's over 18 and human.

Sex workers are legal.

Can't stand on a street corner but you can put an ad up on the internet or phone box.

 

I'm a rock-solid, Right-wing economic Conservative who believes in personal FREEDOM as being one of the very most important rights any American citizen has, and should have! I don't visit prostitutes, and don't watch very much porn, but I think that if a person wants to immerse him/her-self in either of these kinds of activities it is fine with me -- just so long as:

1. I don't have to participate in it.
2. I don't have to look at it.
3. I don't have to listen to it.
4. I don't have to smell it.
5. I don't have to pay for any part of it. (Absolutely NO related 'sob-sister' welfare programs, 'prevention' nonsense, or any of that idiot-liberal "issues" crap!

Same goes for smoking marijuana, drinking alcohol, or anything else a person wants to do within his/her rights as a free American citizen.... Do whatever you want! Have a ball! You enjoy it... but you take all responsibility for it, and you PAY for it!

 

Wrong question. The correct question should be: "Why Porn and Prostitution should be illegal".
My answer - have no reason to make it illegal. Both make people extremely happy.

 

Why have so many famous men been attacked for making having sex with him a condition of employment or advancement if everyone favors prostitution being legal? That is what prostitution is.