Where is the proof that the airliners existed at all?

Discussion in '9/11' started by genericBob, Oct 26, 2014.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    DONT KNOW THE FIRST THING ABOUT BURDEN OF PROOF i SEE.
     
  2. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Oh God, here we go. If one makes a claim, one has the burden. You know this as you've been told often enough, so cut the time wasting garbage, ok?
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,466
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is clearly you lacking comprehension in how burden of proof works.

    Once again evidence has been provided to you and you only demand more while implying the evidence is on doubt.

    The burden is on you to prove the evidence is weak
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    are you joking (I could only hope)

    Evidence must be authenticated, none (court worthy) exists, all we have is a bunch of posers saying 'its aw twu'. jess jess beweeve it or you have to prove us wrong! I have to LMAO every time I see these threads with people posting who havent even watched judge judy FFS
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,466
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It has been verified authenticated and is court room worthy.

    The proof has been shown to you repeatedly you simply deny it
     
  6. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well that was stupid. This is a debate, not a court. I've shown you the evidence and if you don't believe it you have the burden of proof. I don't have to authenticate it for you.

    :deadhorse:

    Listen, if you don't have anything of value to say, please don't respond to my posts. I'm not interested in stupidity like this as it is just idiotic time wasting on your part.
     
  7. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,788
    Likes Received:
    2,387
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is simply an untrue statement.

    It has not been verified and is not court ready. By forcing victim's families to accept and join the class action suit, the government succeeded in keeping all of it out of the courtroom with its discovery procedures.

    The airplane debris has never been examined and is hidden away under Iron Mountain somewhere. NOBODY has been allowed to proceed in court, including April Gallop who worked at the pentagon.

    The only trial they had was the Moussaoui trial, a kangaroo court if there ever was. The irony to that was that by way of discovery there, it was discovered that the ACARS data from 93 showed the flight was still in the system 30 minutes after it supposedly crashed in PA.
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,466
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My statement was true and accurate.

    Your statement is false and outright fiction.

    This has been discussed before and you have been proven wrong.

    No one forced anyone into a class action suit. Various people joined class action suits without any force or coercion whatsoever.

    Class action lawsuits do not exclude evidence nor prevent evidence from being used elsewhere

    The Moussaousi trial was legitimate and your claim it was a kangaroo court is ignorance and nothing more.

    Nor was any such discovery made about any ACARS data.

    All of your claims have been debunked time and again and you know it hence your fiction.

    The evidence is overwhelming that hijacked airliners hit the WTC , pentagon and one crashed in Shanksville. That evidence is verifiable scientifically sound and court room worthy. Those are facts which you have failed to challenge.
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallup su3d for injuries she received from the plane hitting the pentagon....then claims there was no plane,the rest,you're making up.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    he didnt even have an attorney and when he did the attorney he had was hanging him proving the vacuous knowledge of law used in that statement.

     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    shoot yourself in the foot much?
     
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    bingo, you nailed it, these guys come out here and rooty toot toot and dont understand the first thing about what they are talking about. the Moussaoui trial was a joke and proof of the disaster that the american court system has become.
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,466
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes your ignorance is vast.

    He had an attorney.

    You simply made up a falsehood. Actually two falsehoods. The attorney he had did the best job possible.

    Facts prove you wrong once again.
     
  14. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,466
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet as always you cannot offer any evidence of this claim
     
  15. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,788
    Likes Received:
    2,387
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The curious part is how even 14 years later so many humans have not yet realized how badly they have been deceived. I suppose the incessant re-telling of the story, complete with movies, plays a big part in that behavior.
     
  16. Casper

    Casper Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    12,540
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah, sure they are. Don't forget the doctors orders and make sure you take the blue pills with some sort of meal, would not want an upset stomach.
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The only ones trying to retell the story,is you truthers,complete with movies,I might add.

    That,and making **** up out of whole cloth
     
  18. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No. Now, will you at least attempt to address the evidence I posted?
     
  19. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think it was for real.
     

Share This Page