Discussion in '9/11' started by genericBob, Oct 26, 2014.
DONT KNOW THE FIRST THING ABOUT BURDEN OF PROOF i SEE.
Oh God, here we go. If one makes a claim, one has the burden. You know this as you've been told often enough, so cut the time wasting garbage, ok?
It is clearly you lacking comprehension in how burden of proof works.
Once again evidence has been provided to you and you only demand more while implying the evidence is on doubt.
The burden is on you to prove the evidence is weak
are you joking (I could only hope)
Evidence must be authenticated, none (court worthy) exists, all we have is a bunch of posers saying 'its aw twu'. jess jess beweeve it or you have to prove us wrong! I have to LMAO every time I see these threads with people posting who havent even watched judge judy FFS
It has been verified authenticated and is court room worthy.
The proof has been shown to you repeatedly you simply deny it
Well that was stupid. This is a debate, not a court. I've shown you the evidence and if you don't believe it you have the burden of proof. I don't have to authenticate it for you.
Listen, if you don't have anything of value to say, please don't respond to my posts. I'm not interested in stupidity like this as it is just idiotic time wasting on your part.
That is simply an untrue statement.
It has not been verified and is not court ready. By forcing victim's families to accept and join the class action suit, the government succeeded in keeping all of it out of the courtroom with its discovery procedures.
The airplane debris has never been examined and is hidden away under Iron Mountain somewhere. NOBODY has been allowed to proceed in court, including April Gallop who worked at the pentagon.
The only trial they had was the Moussaoui trial, a kangaroo court if there ever was. The irony to that was that by way of discovery there, it was discovered that the ACARS data from 93 showed the flight was still in the system 30 minutes after it supposedly crashed in PA.
My statement was true and accurate.
Your statement is false and outright fiction.
This has been discussed before and you have been proven wrong.
No one forced anyone into a class action suit. Various people joined class action suits without any force or coercion whatsoever.
Class action lawsuits do not exclude evidence nor prevent evidence from being used elsewhere
The Moussaousi trial was legitimate and your claim it was a kangaroo court is ignorance and nothing more.
Nor was any such discovery made about any ACARS data.
All of your claims have been debunked time and again and you know it hence your fiction.
The evidence is overwhelming that hijacked airliners hit the WTC , pentagon and one crashed in Shanksville. That evidence is verifiable scientifically sound and court room worthy. Those are facts which you have failed to challenge.
Gallup su3d for injuries she received from the plane hitting the pentagon....then claims there was no plane,the rest,you're making up.
he didnt even have an attorney and when he did the attorney he had was hanging him proving the vacuous knowledge of law used in that statement.
shoot yourself in the foot much?
bingo, you nailed it, these guys come out here and rooty toot toot and dont understand the first thing about what they are talking about. the Moussaoui trial was a joke and proof of the disaster that the american court system has become.
Yes your ignorance is vast.
He had an attorney.
You simply made up a falsehood. Actually two falsehoods. The attorney he had did the best job possible.
Facts prove you wrong once again.
Yet as always you cannot offer any evidence of this claim
The curious part is how even 14 years later so many humans have not yet realized how badly they have been deceived. I suppose the incessant re-telling of the story, complete with movies, plays a big part in that behavior.
Yeah, sure they are. Don't forget the doctors orders and make sure you take the blue pills with some sort of meal, would not want an upset stomach.
The only ones trying to retell the story,is you truthers,complete with movies,I might add.
That,and making **** up out of whole cloth
No. Now, will you at least attempt to address the evidence I posted?
I think it was for real.
Separate names with a comma.