Where is the proof that the airliners existed at all?

Discussion in '9/11' started by genericBob, Oct 26, 2014.

  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No Bob....You really need to leave math alone


    And stop missing the point.
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm calling foul here, I have proved that the facade of the WTC tower was less than 1/3 open space for windows and you refused to even acknowledge my post, and now you tell me I need to leave math alone, WHY, where is your rebuttal with your own math that proves me wrong?
    You don't have it! the figures do not lie, the flight of the alleged "FLT175" is impossible as described by the official story.
     
  3. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Something for you to read through...

    https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-pilots-for-9-11-truth-wtc-speeds.2942/
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry Bob,but giving your opinion about the facade isn't 'proving' JACK,all I need is a pair of eyes and that's IT.


    And more opinion.....swell.
     
  5. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Those perimeter columns were constructed of 1/4" steel plate and were approximately 14.5" square. Do you have calculations showing how that facade would react to the focused impact of a jet?
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So people can "eyeball" a scene and get better accuracy than with real measurements & calculations....(?)

    The statement that "FLT175" would be impossible as described in the official story.
    stands, and has a foundation of the data that the power required to propel any physical body through air increased by the CUBE of the velocity.

    Can we please stick to the bit we were discussing here? or is that too difficult?

    also that www.metabunk.org link goes to a pitched battle of debate, no possible conclusion from this at all, some people may consider the matter settled, but that is a matter of opinion.
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Stop trying math Bob,you stink at it


    And YOU'RE the one all over the page,here
     
  8. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can you be specific, that is at what point did I fail?
    I have quoted a WIKI article that specifies the Power increase by the CUBE of the velocity,
    and that is a given, unless WIKI can be proven wrong, so what is the problem here?

    Can you cite the data for the steel structure of the WTC outer wall and prove that there was "mostly window" ?
     
  9. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So tell us genericBob, how much power was required to propel the plane at 300 MPH and how much would be needed for 600 MPH?

    You didn't read it did you? there's quite a bit of useful information in that debate that has one person admitting that P4T is spreading garbage. Is there something in that conversation that you find is incorrect or are you just going to dismiss it without presenting your reasons why?
     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Can you cite the data or information that shows the perimeter facade components should have withstood the focused impact load impact of a 767?
     
  11. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You're not presenting any numbers genericBob. How much power is needed to propel a 767 at 300 MPH at 1000 ft? How much power is needed to propel a 767 at 600 MPH at 1000 ft? Would the angle of descent increase or decrease the power needed to propel a 767 at a certain speed?

    Your constant cries of "power increases by the CUBE of velocity" means nothing at this point.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bump for bob to show his math.
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We KNOW the planes flew downward into the towers,this was observed..And the one pilot on that forum said that even a shallow dive would increase speed
     
  14. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    C'mon genericBob.

    Show us how much power was needed to propel a 767 at 300 mph at 1000 ft
    Show us how much power was needed to propel a 767 at 600 mph at 1000 ft.
    Show us that the power needed at 600 mph was over the power limit supplied by the two engines.

    Then tell us if ANY (3, 4, or, 5 degrees) angle of dive would reduce the power needed to attain the speed of 600 mph.
     
  15. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I know you haven't been around in a while genericBob, but I thought I'd post this just for you.

    Explain, in the video below, how the ping pong ball both broke apart AND penetrated the paddle. According to you, this shouldn't happen. How did "physics" not apply the day this experiment happened?

    I mean how can a ball made of a thin plastic skin and filled with air penetrate a wooden paddle?

    [video=youtube;Wc-zmb3jAgo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc-zmb3jAgo[/video]
     
  16. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Better yet, how did the CIA produce the mass hallucination in at least a couple million people who WITNESSED the 2nd plane crash into the WTC and the towers collapsing?
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,904
    Likes Received:
    975
    Trophy Points:
    113
    this is for you Gam, explain how come a lousy steel pole smashed the hell out of these vehicles.


    [​IMG]

    then when you are finished explaining that explain why a truck can smash through an invincible plane without even damaging the cab.


    [​IMG]
     
  18. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Since you are playing dumb here, let's ask you a few questions. Maybe if you provide the answers, you'll figure it out.

    1. What is the speed of the truck compared to the plane?
    2. What is the weight of the truck versus the plane?
    3. How much resistance is provided by the CONCRETE FILLED STEEL POLE ANCHORED TO THE GROUND against the truck compared to the 14 1/2" square, 1/4 thick steel plate, bolted together, against a 767?

    Provide me those answers to show that you understand what is going on here.
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,904
    Likes Received:
    975
    Trophy Points:
    113
    figure what out?
     
  20. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL...
     
  21. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    :roll:

    Did you forget what you were having a problem figuring out that quickly?
     
  22. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I know these questions keep me waking at night. What if the Wright brothers never existed :eekeyes: in reality ? There are no such thing as air liners it is all part of the 911 conspiracy. I mean flying? If humans were meant to fly we be born with wings, I dont by this whole Aero Plane thing. So if there is no such thing as planes, what actually brought those buildings down? I say it was ACME made tnt, used by coyote in alliance with yosemiti sam.
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,904
    Likes Received:
    975
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you do not want to take this golden opportunity to explain it?
     
  24. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I gave you some information to gather in a quote above. Go find it and come back to me. If you can't give me the answers to those questions, it proves you don't want to learn and have no clue about what you are talking about. I'm not wasting my time on someone with both those characteristics.

    Quit being lazy for once.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,904
    Likes Received:
    975
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so you cant explain it after all, hmmmm........
     

Share This Page