Whistleblower reveals poor food quality making Michigan National Guard members sick

Bad food is not a PARTIZAN political issue. Bad Microbes do not GAS who gets sick be itbright ring Anus Heads like Nazis or Promise keepers or RW Jim Jordan friend of pedophiles or the Seven Sisters of the left wing AOC cabal of teenage political GOGO girls in Congress.

 

I feel a certain amount of justice was given to Americans with a defecation, but hat might depend on the context of that particular pile.

I don't agree with the person trying to sell the laptop to Russia but then I don't necessary believe what the news says at this point. I will wait and see. This isn't the same as intent to murder though. I don't think it was a guarantee that it would have amounted to violence against the Senators but there was too much risk to say otherwise. This current phobia is ridiculous though. I mean AOC thinks teddy bear Ted Cruz might have murdered her or something. Maybe thats just AOC though. She is special.

 

There was no insurrection.

The media said it was an insurrection, repeating that lie innumerable times in accordance with the maxim of Goebbels, and you obviously believe it.

 

From Merriam dictionary.

Insurrection: an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurrection

Revolt ✔

Against established authority ✔

Established government ✔

It seems it meets all of the requirements.

Below is a link to contact Merriam in case you wanted to submit a complaint.

Good luck.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/contact-us

 

From the Bill Of Rights: Congress shall make no law respecting....the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

I think you may have posted this in the wrong thread as it has absolutely no relevance to our current discussion.

 

In your post 54 you attempted to make the case that what happened was an insurrection, the case made by MSM.

I showed that there is a right to assemble peaceably and petition the government.

Now you say my reply was irrelevant.

That is easily construed as a display of cognitive dissonance.

 

My definition of insurrection was based on the dictionary, not the MSM.

Breaking an entering, killing cops, pipe bombs, property destruction and chanting to kill politicians has nothing to do with the right to peacefully assemble.

You implying it does is disengenious.

 

Not to brag, but maybe I'm more perceptive than you. I have not questioned the Merriam definition, and I'm thrilled to see one post a definition. Thanks for that.

The point is that MSM has PORTRAYED the event as insurrection. They have used that word incessantly to describe the events.

It was not an insurrection, it was an example of people exercising their First Amendment right to petition the government about grievances.

MSM is 95% a propaganda organ for government and corporate agenda. I understand that but apparently you do not.

 

You can brag if you wish. I am sure you are very perceptive. That said, I provided the definition and yet you rebuke my arguement...which contradicts the dictionary definition of insurrection.

Well that makes sense to me. The media likes to use emotional terms as audiences tend to respond more strongly. The term is accurate however, so not sure why this seems to trigger you.

I refer you again to the dictionary definition of insurrection. The gathering at the capital was not peaceful...which is what distinguishes a constitutional right to peacefully protest vs an insurrection.

Do you have a link that supports your contention of 95 percent? Not saying you are wrong but that sounds suspiciously like a right wing talking point.

Also, you seem to be an authority on media outlets...probably because you are so perceptive. What media outlet do you recommend I get my always honest and non bias news? I would be glad to check it out. Thanks in advance.

 

Because they are going to try and ram through as much radical policies while they have complete control, to solidify their power and are worried that their radical agenda might escalate tensions with half of America.

 

Whistleblower reveals poor food quality making Michigan National Guard members sick

The governors who sent them should bring them home. The feds will keep them there forever. It enhances their power and control.

 

Call me right wing, call me left wing, call me whatever you wish.

What happened that day was not an insurrection. The media portrays it that way to sustain the lie that the election was legit.

I consider you an adult. Read and view whatever source you want, and practice independent thinking. That is the advice I give anybody. Analyze all the facts available and practice critical thinking.

You might not know Dr. Simone Gold, but she was there too, and arrested at her home in California days or weeks later, in the middle of the night by armed federal agents. She was not practicing insurrection, just as she was not practicing insurrection when she stood with other medical doctors months before pointing out the long known efficacy of HCQ.

She was certainly being way politically incorrect, but she was not engaged in insurrection as the media would have the gullible masses believe.

 

? I called you nothing but perceptive.

Did you contact Merrium about their definition of insurrection? If so, what did they say?

I do. That is why I define "insurrection" using a dictionary and not my own personal feelings.

I am not familiar with her nor her specific case but fail to see the relevance.

Their was an insurrection. I do not know what part she played. If she was not engaged in the insurrection, then good for her.

 

The 'crisis' of insurrection is similar to the 'crisis' of covid--entirely manufactured by the media and special interests, bought into by gullible and frightened humans.

Why did it happen? Because the facts and evidence are ample that in some states there were blatant voting errors, and it was blatant that the media and the courts participated in a coverup. All because people strongly dislike DJT. I do too, but I don't let that blind me to those voting irregularities.

What also happened, it appears to me, is that those good and ordinary citizens like Simone Gold were infiltrated unknowingly by agents provocateur, an ancient practice amongst humans.

The media promoted that sort of 'false flag' just as it has promoted so many other false flags in the last 20 years.

 

I thought we were discussing the insurrection?

Their are a ton of threads about the election that debunks your assertions better then I can. Feel free to visit those threads.

Your fixation on Simone Gold is intriguing but I also fail to see the relevance to the insurrection on Jan 6th.

 

We are discussing the events of January 6, but I'm posting things that threaten your media created worldview.

I'm shattering your illusions of insurrection.

 

That is odd since my view is based on the dictionary definition of the word insurrection and not the media.

 

I'm all for dictionary definitions.

What actually happened that day does not meet the definition. Simone Gold is but one example of that. Being politically incorrect in this mad world is not tantamount to insurrection, though the media portrays it otherwise.

A brother of a friend was also there, and he too was arrested days or weeks later, and all his computer stuff was confiscated. He happens to live in that area and decided to exercise his First Amendment right. He had no weapon or anything else.

 

I don't think you are.

See post 54. Which parts are you contending?

The arrests associated with the insurrection are public record. Can you link this arrest?

 

No I cannot. I heard the news from the man's brother, and I don't think he's making it up.

If you don't know what I'm contending, English must not be your primary language, or your dissonance is strong.

I'm contending that what happened on 6 January was not insurrection, it was an exercise of First Amendment rights. I'm contending that everything you see on your TV is not necessarily true.

I'm contending that William Casey's 1981 statement regarding misinformation efforts is in full play today with that incident.

 

I repeat; my assesement of the insurrection that took place is based on the dictionary, not the media. As I stated earlier please take up your issues with Merrum.

 

My assessment is based upon how the media has presented it, what I have been told by the brother of one who was present, my knowledge of the First Amendment, and my knowledge of the behavior of the known liars in the media.

I appreciate your bringing Merriam into the discussion, and what happened there does not meet the Merriam definition.

 

It's a matter of perception and how that is formed.

I say again, everything the media says is not necessarily true, and the media (for those paying attention) has a long history of false narratives.