White Nationalist turns YELLOW

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ge...rminates-his-membership/ar-BBBn2Gq?li=BBnbfcL

I'll start with some excerpts:

"An Alexandria gym terminated the membership of white nationalist Richard Spencer last week after he was confronted by a Georgetown University professor who recognized him and lambasted him over his alt-right views.

...“Are you Richard Spencer?” she asked him, describing the encounter in an online post. “No. I am not,” he replied.

...
Spencer asked for a trainer — a black woman — to help get him out of the confrontation.

“Seriously? This superior race of a white man needed the help of a female African American? What kind of martial race member is he?” Fair wrote in her post."

I have told white activists, many times, that I can understand some of their fears, frustrations and their anger. But, Spencer's actions are standard fare for what I've experienced first hand from these people.

They love to talk the talk, provided it's done in a manner where they control the conversation and think they can avoid the consequences. My experience includes many years of holding public meetings twice a month - and I bore most of the costs. During those meetings when I spoke and the racists disagreed with my conclusions, they would remain silent. They would then go home, call their friends and tell them what an S.O.B. (and I don't mean Swell Ol Boy) I was just before they got on the Internet and posted their usual swill.

When they don't have a case, they become the consummate democrat, relying on the popularity of their message. Unfortunately, the MSM helps them along to the extent it serves their purpose. They dominate discussion boards and talk radio; they are adept at denying who they are and what they are most of the time, but I find it interesting how they react when they cannot defend their cause in public. Rarely will the MSM remind you of who, exactly, is behind some of the popular themes that are promoted simply for their sensationalism.

I've had my home broken to, a cat killed and hung across a tree limb in my back yard, my personal information put on discussion boards by these guys and all of them act exactly like little Dick Spencer.

If you believe in something, you should be able to articulate it and defend it. Doesn't Spencer's actions speak louder than all the words I can put on this thread?

 

So Spencer, maintained his composure, acknowledged the womans 1st amendment rights, and allowed her to freely express her opinion? Filthy alt right coward! How dare he display acceptable social etiquette! Why did he refuse to be triggered!

 

He was so scared, he lied about who he was.

 

Scared, or didn't want to make a scene when one was not needed?

 

The scene was already being made. If he were going to lie, maybe he should have run too. Busted is busted. I've been in his shoes many times. I've never denied who I was in public. And one of your own once thought it was a good idea to post my personal information on this board after I'd been out of the public spotlight for over a decade.

Nah, I know cowardly when I see it.

 

I don't know what this "one of your own" thing is, I am by myself here.

But, as you say, takes one to know one huh?

 

Let me put it to you like this:

Until you get to that day where you can say you've spent tens of thousands of dollars on what you believe in; until you can look at an acre of property and say that the people you've known who lost their lives in defense of this country would not fit if buried side by side there; and until you've faced off with political enemies by the hundreds, you shouldn't rattle my cage.

People know they can come on these sites and be anonymous. You don't have to be accountable. You can talk sh!+ all day long, but it would be no different than little Dick Spencer. Rather than challenge people face to face, the younger generation hides behind the computer. I don't. I never have and I never will.

Having said that, the white people get a raw deal in America. OTOH, the whites have done themselves irreparable harm with failing strategies, turning on their own country, supporting socialism, and running like cowards. Instead of winning the cause for Liberty, the Spencers think they are going to browbeat a corrupt government in Washington Wonderland, District of Corruption to take up their cause and do their fighting - as exemplified by little Dick Spencer's actions when he failed to stand up to a challenge.

Let me make my point blunt clear to every swinging richard that accesses this thread:

I believe in the Rights of white people and their right to self determination... the right to a homeland, the Rights that our forefathers fought, bled and died in order to secure for them AND their posterity. I also believe that all men are born with the inherent and unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. I've never found it necessary to step on the Rights of another human being in order to exercise my own.

Now, here I have a thread about little Dick Spencer and if his supporters want to change it and make the thread about me, that's good. It's chickensh!+ and cowardly; it's a deflection; it's a dishonest attempt to cut and run yet again. But, if it makes those guys feel better, give it their best shot. Unlike little Dick, I've never backed down. That is the primary difference between yours truly and the people who think they belong in the same camp with constitutionalists, patriots and those who are really active (like beyond the whizzing contests on discussion boards.)

 

I like the Bolded accents, makes this rant even more believable. Anyways, just cause I question you on your mind reading abilities, doesn't make me a Spencer supporter. That guy can go the way of David Duke and be irrelevant.

Also, I don't believe in White nationalism, black power, Asian persuasion, etc. I believe in the individual and their rights, not the group. So get off your high horse in thinking you know anything about me, you are sadly mistaken.

 

This thread is not about you. It is about little Dick Spencer. Apparently you have some interest. You're here.

 

Just calling out your mind reading skills. You have affirmed he is "yellow" based off your own experiences. I am just a skeptic, offering up other ideas for why he did what he did.

 

Who are you that you are so publicly known? If you are such a celebrity, why dont you use your real name here?

 

That's the whole point. I existed before the Internet and if people really want to know, they contact me privately and if a man's word is not good enough, there are plenty of videos, copies of newspapers, etc. in the basement... not to mention older folks in the neighborhood that knew me years ago.

This thread isn't about me; I'm only relevant to the discussion if Spencer's supporters wanted to ever challenge me face to face.

 

Nice non answer.

Unless you are refuting anything in the story, it sounds to me like some loud mouth being very disrespectful of someone elses privacy while he tried to avoid the situation.

 

You tried to prove my point a moment ago. You thought I should give up my Right to privacy and I'm not a public person while defending little Dick who is a public figure.

If he wanted privacy, he should post on boards, anonymously, and not say things he will be called on to defend. It don't matter who you are. If you claim any knowledge on a topic, those on the left and the right will not examine the facts; they will only destroy your privacy Rights - mostly in the vain hopes of digging up dirt on you so that an individual becomes the subject and the issue is decided on the popularity of the messenger, not the value of the message.

 

You believe that anyone with a public imagine gives up all rights to privacy and must engage random, hostile people on the street. Thats very interesting.

 

Question...Why was his membership terminated?

 

And you felt that I should give up my Right to privacy just to have a point. Right? Guess that makes us about even.

 

thats the exact opposite of my point. My point is that privacy should be respected. If a public figure doesnt wish to be bothered, I have no problem with them denying who they are to some irate random person.

 

There was no legally justifiable reason to terminate his membership. He could win the case in court, but you won't see any whites that will go to court and enforce their Rights - and he will probably walk away from this and forget it.

 

Well that makes me feel good. I won't need to tell everybody who I am and every detail of my past - including an autobiography with supporting links every time I relate a personal experience from my past.

Still don't lie to people about who I am. Rethinking the error in light of this thread.

 

The article attached to the OP seems to indicate he is going to do something about it, we'll see. It is wrong though, and for anyone to agree with it, but disagree with a cake maker, florist, or tee shirt printer is hypocritical. Wouldn't you agree?

 

Your post isn't very clear. You will have to rephrase the question if you want an answer as I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

 

Lately we have had people that got all up in arms over a discrimination of one kind or another, and him being kicked out because of his ideology is wrong also.

 

I agree. I'm a Trump supporter and, like all the Trump supporters I know, think Richard Spencer is an *******. Not worthy of a thread.

Also the OP falsely equates Nationalism with Supremacy.

 

I fully agree. OTOH, I am sick and tired of weakness and people backing down.

I wake up wondering why people like Tim Allen, Mel Gibson, and all the entertainers that got the shaft don't organize and build their own tv station and movie recording outlet, making movies and not kissing the Establishment's a**.

How come the posterity of the founding fathers have to hide like scared rats and they cannot organize, unite and speak out?

How come the only politicians that these guys follow are committed to the absolute destruction of the foundational principles upon which our Republic rests?