"Who had the means, motive, and opportunity" to carry out 9/11?

Chocolate chip?

 

I can't understand why this post doesn't already have a dozen or more "Likes."

It is spot on and detailed enough to explain the facts to anyone who is ignorant of them.

Good OP!

 

The last thing "truthers" really want to know is, the truth.

They just want their emotional beliefs validated.

 

......

 

Reality bites, huh?

 

Still on a jew bash? You are pouring out jew hatred into a thread which has nothing to do with jews, nor does your posts have anything to do with 9/11. Go start your own thread, you can call it "neo-nazi pins 9/11 (and everything else) on joooooos" and ramble on and on in your own thread to your hearts content. It will be your own little hate corner, where you can sit all day and throw poo at the walls, and no one will disturb you.

 

Pardon me if I respond emotionally to having mass murder and theft committed on US soil by foreign entities.

I don't see how you could expect anything less.

If you are saying that there is no evidence that these things have been committed, then you are simply not owning up to the facts.

http://rense.com/general75/latest.htm

 

Truthers never stop do they? Whether its the jews us government aliens and actors (yes there's 911truthers who think actors were involved in 911)

They can't seem to phathom that 19 muslim radicals did it

 

The title of the thread is "Who had the means, the motive, and the opportunity to carry out 9/11?"

What I am posting had everything to do with this thread.

If this bothers you, then you are just as free to leave as I am.

As it is I do not intend to let youskys off that easily. The Stazi will have to ban me outright.

If hearing the truth bothers you that badly then perhaps you could try greasing someones palm. This works most everywhere else doesn't it?

- - - Updated - - -

Yes. They're sort of like "Nazi hunters" in pursuit of justice. We'll never forget.

 

Wrong again, holston.

Where has this been done?

 

Your assistant forgot to delete this one. You should have checked yourself before you stuck your foot in your mouth, not that it was all that difficult for you.

Just one example among many.





Why can't you just explain this away?

One rat pill like this might be overlooked as "coincidental" even though it is highly suggestive.
A thousand others like it make the statistical likelihood of all of them being the product of chance vanishingly small.

You know this. I know this.

The Kosher referees know this.

My only concern is for those who are unaware of the Zionist agenda to know it.


The rest of you can continue on your merry way to......well, you know.

 

What a load of fiction.

 

2.3 trillion would have been about HALF of what the country had spent since we had become a country...I wonder if troothers can grasp that fact...most certianly rumsfeld had meant billions and misspoke....

 

It was deleted.
I have no assistants.

The story you posted was a fairy tale: it didn't happen.
Why do you let paranoia dictate you?

 

Even ONE TRILLION is an unimaginably large number.
That's why people don't grasp the enormity of the thefts, not only the ones Zakheim oversaw, but especially those being conducted by the Federal Reserve.

The Jewish lobbies haven't worked since their introduction into this country to obtain those positions for "their tribe" for nothing. They, like everyone else have their own welfare in mind and likewise their own political objectives. They haven't neglected to pursue them. And they have been careful to keep a low profile while doing so, insofar as public scrutiny goes.

We know what Rumsfeld said. This leads me to believe that Rumsfeld, like so many other Goy toys was played like a Stradivarious by a fiddler on a roof. The way he made the announcement of the missing THREE TRILLION was almost like he has been blindsided himself. It reminds me of the way Giulliani looked side ways like a wide eyed doe for advice on what to tell the press about the explosions on 9/11 from that jail bird mob associated police chief of his.

I'm not trying to exonerate the Goyim who have participated in the coup of the US government. I just think that they have acted like more or less willing tools by those around them who have led the parade of "the long march".

In other words, I don't think they are all so blind or stupid that they couldn't see or at least suspect what was happening, but they merely acquiesced or "turned a blind " eye by whatever perks, gifts, or implied threats which were strewn before them on their paths to power.

As I said earlier, it is not considered so much of a sin to lay the blame for 9/11 at the feet of Bush and Cheney.
You may say it was due to their ineptitude or even that they deliberately plotted murder. I don't believe it was either. You might get a feigned token resistance or called "nut" by those who never pass the opportunity to say it.


What you can NOT say, however, is that any Jews were involved in the scheme. Not only are you not allowed to say that certain among them CONSPIRED, you are not even allowed to suggest that they even ALLOWED 9/11 to happen.

This taboo lies at the heart of "Political Correctness". It was once even not permissible to be critical of any "black" or even so much as use the term "Negro". Now that the Neo-Cons have arrived on the scene, they have loosened this unspoken policy to permit certain Goy to do a certain amount of black bashing, particularly when it comes to Yomamma. This betrays the true sentiment of the Jewish establishment towards the blacks whom they have used in their quest for power. This has been made apparent in Israel's policy towards Ethiopian "Jewish" immigrants.

But the hands off policy concerning a Jew, any Jew, or Jews in general is now even stronger and more strictly enforced than ever.

That is why the whole subject of 9/11 has been suppressed by the media and youskys attack people like myself for bringing it up. That's because one can not really discuss 9/11 to any depth at all because to do so points so very obviously to the only people who could have had all the means, motives, and opportunities. Since these people can be no others than Jews/Israelis and Zionists the subject is strictly off limits.

The reason why "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" has gotten nowhere is because it is hamstrung by these obvious implications. They may not speculate at all beyond the simple mechanics of how the buildings fell because to do so would point directly at the Zionist mob. They even have a Zionist Jew and self admitted Socialist who has stepped into the central spotlight to lead them..... to nowhere.

These constraints upon free speech where Jews are concerned is unfortunate not only in the pursuit of justice over 9/11 but also in law enforcement. We know this is true because members of the CIA, FBI, and other intelligence and law enforcement have admitted that to speak openly of Jewish spying or to suggest Jewish involvement in 9/11 is "career suicide".

The same rule applies to academic circles as well as work places. People who want to keep their jobs know to keep their mouths shut. Anyone who might know something or feel inclined to speak their mind understands without being told that they'd best not do so because the entire public is either too ignorant or too timid to back them up. They would be martyring themselves for nothing.

This impediment to free speech is especially heinous when it comes to the subject of organized crime because the Jewish "Russian" mob is currently the most wide spread and pernicious one in the world. They possess much of the power and resources that once belonged to the Soviet Union and hence pose a very real and serious threat to the Constitutional Republic of the US. In fact, many people believe it is already dead and remains extent in name only.

I'm not sure I agree that all is lost. But left to the likes of you people it most certainly is. Organized crime, murder, massive thefts, you name it. All is approved in your book as long as it is a Jewish criminal committing the crime in such a way as you believe it will advance the status of the Jewish population in general.


If hating that quality or "attitude" among you makes me an "anti-Semite" then I won't dispute the fact, because I do indeed despise it; only not so much because it is "Jewish" as because it is MORALLY CORRUPT.

You people have chosen your Gd. I have chosen mine.

It is long past time that the Jewish SOCIO-POLITICAL machine become subjected to the same scrutiny and public criticism that the "white 'good ol' boy establishment" has been subjected to by their Jewish critics.

Let the Jew bashing commence!

 

<sigh>..Because Jews,part 19

 

I know that you would rather have us all leave out any circumstantial evidence which might be incriminating to any Jew or Jews whether they be US or Israeli.

I know that youskys would much prefer to limit any discussion of 9/11 to those concerned with the mathematics of building construction, explosive ordinances, physics and etc.

Not only would that restrict the conversation to those well versed in differential equations and so forth, but I'm sure you realize that there really is no way to determine with absolute certainty much of anything about the WTC collapses since no one is privy to the starting conditions which would be requisite to doing those calculations even if they were possible.

Most of all it would eliminate the most incriminating evidence of all with respect to 9/11 which doesn't require a shred of math or even a college degree to comprehend.

I'm sure that youskys would be much more comfortable if everyone would at least limit the possibilities of who might have been responsible for 9/11 to W Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld.


Even more so, I'm absolutely certain that you would be tickled pink if everyone who brought up the subject of 9/11 would not only comply to the above restrictions, but would also only present the most absurd and easily disproved assertions about 9/11 such that it would give the impression that everyone who does so has to be a kook or not capable of rational thought.

It would be OK with you no doubt if I went on line in the name of 9/11 "Truth" and made some claim like the towers were destroyed by Martians hovering around in the stratosphere under cloaking devices, at per the instructions of Dick Cheney who is really a cleverly disguised Lizard person.


That would male your online mission a piece of cake wouldn't it?



Well forget it.

As lazy as you apparently you need to be made to at least type two or three words over again for whatever you're getting paid.


The beauty of a thread entitled as this one is, is that you can accuse anyone who wants to expose some of the real evidence about 9/11 of "derailing the thread", as if everyone who sees anything wrong with the Kosher tale about 9/11 had to believe that there are hidden messages foretelling the event in decades old album covers, AND as if the movement for 9/11 truth needed such a trivial piece of nonsense to demonstrate a valid case.

Youskys must think we're ALL stupid putzes.

 

If the shoe fits ...

 

It only fits those who buy your lies. I don't.

 

Of course not. You have a great rotting pile of your own to sell.

Yours, by contrast, are intended to provide a causus belli for the RaHoWa. Mankind cannot afford to allow you to do that.

 

Classic case of attempted suicide by mod, so he can feel oppressed.

 

Because Jews,part 21

 

I've been accused of making "racial" slurs here.

Here's what I would like to know.
The forum Hasbara tell me that Jews are "white" men.

If that's true, then how can I, as a "white" man make "racial" slurs against another "white" man?

 

Since I am being forced to repeat everything twice, let's see if I can word this in a way that doesn't gore anybodies ox around here. That seems awfully easy to do.

Mentioning Jews and 9/11 in the same breath seems to be about all it takes.

As I said earlier, this video does a decent job of showing some of the many Jewish/Zionist links to 9/11. I'm so sorry if this just happens to be true.

If you are like me, then you might get more out of the film by muting the sound track. It's really only there for effect. The important thing is the reading material. That's where the message is, or as the old saying went "where the action is".

Anyone is free to deny that those links exist or that those characters listed are anything but what they are said to be in the video.

I guess it depends upon which you think is worse, calling someone by the same name that they call themselves or lying about it.

If I am guilty of anything it's just pointing out what anyone else can verify if they've a mind to. They can do that or they can just toss their lot in with the liars.

[video=youtube;7-tUV0cnyv8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-tUV0cnyv8[/video]

 

What is 'Hasbara'? Is that an insult?