1988 - Jack Anderson - Conspiracy and Conspiracy to Cover It Up. [video=youtube;oDbodTKnTjc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDbodTKnTjc[/video]
This is a very interesting video about the murder of JFK. Toward the end of the video Jack Anderson posts the names of the many people who were speaking out and died mysterious deaths. That confession not proof but it is interesting.
Jack Anderson obviously thought there was a conspiracy behind the murder of JFK as did many people who were killed for their belief. If Oswald acted alone, then what was his motive?
Yes hundreds of films and thousands of books fail to produce evidence of a conspiracy and the fact is Oswald shot Kennedy
The poor conspiracy theorists don't realize that the authors of these books and creators of these movies have just used them, to make $$. This is the sad part about all of this. These conspiracy theorists are so gullible that they truly believe that the Roger Stone's, Mark Lane's, Jesse Ventura's are honest men of integrity who just want to arrive at the truth. These guys are all frauds selling stories to make themselves rich. The day one of these nuts writes a book and doesn't get a penny from it, is the day i MAY take them seriously. Maybe i should write one myself, and make my millions.
who said such a thing? brotha jon, don't you think it's true that the authors of these books have been frauds? i can see them sitting at home laughing and thinking 'these fools, believing all of these ridiculous stories in my book' $$ in the bank!' you won't even consider this possibility brotha Jon? how naive can you be?
Follow the money, Mike. The first ever live killing on TV. Oswald. If JFK could have been the first then the TV networks could have brought in $ Billions instead of the $ Millions that Oswald brought. Unfortunately, the CIA kept the live coverage of the Zapruder film unavailable to the public for a dozen years. They did not want the public to know the truth. In 2017, 1100 CIA documents are to be released to the people. What do you think they will show? That Oswald killed Kennedy in lone gunman style? I think not. I don't believe that Oswald even knew Kennedy was assassinated until the radio told him exactly as he stated.
Money is only SOMETIMES the motive in crime. No one ever claimed that Oswald shot kennedy because Oswald was a communist. It just burns left wingers up that a far left winger killed a moderate left winger. Oswald was a nut and because he is dead we can only speculate at his motives but they are based on logic and his known personality. The Zapruder film was a uuuuuuhhhhh recording. This means by definition it was not live coverage. The CIA never had the film nor control over it. It was quickly purchased from Abraham Zapruder by Time Life who then kept it for many years. Of course you may think what you like about Oswald but the evidence proves you wrong.
You're in error,if you think that. But hey,if the documents show otherwise,I'll admit to being wrong.....but if they show YOU'RE wrong,will you admit the same?
We'll see in 2017 if I am still around. If I am wrong I will admit I was wrong. Whats in CIAs secret JFK files?
thats his argument,he always runs off like all magic bullet theorists do and changes the subject when he is cornered with these facts about oswald that prove all this could have only happend if he was workin for the intelligence agencies.hee hee. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=271922
>>>MOD EDIT: INSULT<<<. "9/11 was an inside job" definitely does not believe in the magic bullet theory.
I comprehend it fine it is you with trouble grasping it. Yes he is absolutely a magic bullet theory believer as you are. What you fail to grasp is that the magic bullet theory was manufactured by conpriacy theory AUTHORS and MOVIE MAKERS. Therefore those such as YOU who believe in a conspiracy to kill JFK are the magic bullet theory believers it is a conspiracy theory lie and a conspiracy theory delusion. Not a government delusion or lie. This has all been proven to you repeatedly but you cannot grasp it.
One reason that I believe the JFK assassination was a conspiracy is because the House of Representatives studied JFK's assassination and concluded it was a conspiracy. Now you telling me it's just authors and stuff making it up.
You never read their conclusion. They actually issued two seperate conclusions. The second found a PROBABLE conspiracy. Notice they did not conclude it was certian. The first conclusion was that Oswald acted alon. The difference between the two was one piece of evidence which was the dictaphone recording from Dallas police. Three technicians presented an analysis as evidence of a second shooter. Unfortunately the House select commitee on assassination had a limited time line and a limited budget and therefore was forced to issue a conclusion and disband before this analysis could be verified. After the commitee adjourned and disbanded it was proven that the recoding was no made in dealey plaza. This evidence was the only evidence on which the commitee based it's PROBABLE conspiracy conclusion and since it is not valid the conclusion is proven wrong. All of this is published in the commitee records.
rolls on floor laughing. yep folks,oswald with this cheap piece of crap mannicher canrcano rifle with a scope badly misalined according to the magic bullet theorists,fired three shots through a tree that was blocking the view as can be seen in photos, weent at a downward angle going pwards exiting the nexk and stopping in mid air doing these incredle stops and turns and then struck a streetsign,hit the grass on the opposite side saying there,then also went through a windshiled hole as well and also the same bullet that stayed in same grass,also stayed in the chrom of a doorfrrame in the limo,and made mark on the manhole cover,and made one on the sidewalk as well and the witnesses that said they saw a gunman firing a rifle behind the picket fence were all smoking crack and dod not know what they were talking about,and ALL the dallas doctors who said the entrance wounds to head and through were shots that came from the front were all the most incompetentetn dallas doctors in the world and did not know what they were talking about. yep folks,the best evidence shows oswald was the lone assassin and there no multiple shooters there that day. comedy gold
very accurate statement.I dont believe in the magic bullet theory because unlike the magic bullet theorists,i dont ignore the laws of physics every junior high school kid learns at that age nor do i blatantly go into things only seeing what I want to see ignoring that witnesses saw a gunman fire a riflle behind the picket fence or ignoring that the dallas doctors have said over the years both wounds of the head and through were from the front.
Yes he is in fact. Conspiracy theorists are the people who made up the magic bullet theory and who believe in it.
No one least of all the government ever made any of the claims which you state above. This is why you are the magic bullet theory believer. Furthermore the fact is no witnesses saw a man on the knoll shooting a rifle. A few only claimed to have heard shots coming from the knoll. Hearing is not the same as seeing. No doctors at Parkland claimed that the wounds stated that the entrance wounds were in the front. The rifle was a rifle cheap or not. Rifles can kill whether cheap or expensive. The scope was only found to have been misaligned after multiple government agencies disassembeled and reassembeled it. In addition he did not need the scope at the close ranges he fired from, he was trained to shoot with iron sights at such ranges. No photographs show the tree blocking the shots. The bullet did not need to travel in any zigzags as you claim and no one said it did except conspiracy theorists. No one ever claimed it struck all the objects you claim. - - - Updated - - - No one least of all the government ever made any of the claims which you state above. This is why you are the magic bullet theory believer. Furthermore the fact is no witnesses saw a man on the knoll shooting a rifle. A few only claimed to have heard shots coming from the knoll. Hearing is not the same as seeing. No doctors at Parkland claimed that the wounds stated that the entrance wounds were in the front. The rifle was a rifle cheap or not. Rifles can kill whether cheap or expensive. The scope was only found to have been misaligned after multiple government agencies disassembeled and reassembeled it. In addition he did not need the scope at the close ranges he fired from, he was trained to shoot with iron sights at such ranges. No photographs show the tree blocking the shots. The bullet did not need to travel in any zigzags as you claim and no one said it did except conspiracy theorists. No one ever claimed it struck all the objects you claim.
The reason you are a magic bullet believer is that you claim that others claimed that the bullet did such things and they never did. The bullet traveled a normal ballistic path which is all anyone ever described it as traveling. No witnesses saw someone shooting from the knoll and no Parkland doctors stated that the wounds came from the front.
I agree with this. Conspiracy theorists, the official fairy tale, made up the magic bullet theory. Some of us don't buy it.
