Why 7WTC?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Blues63, Mar 24, 2015.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,985
    Likes Received:
    379
    Trophy Points:
    83
    actually it is you who completely missed the point and what I said is directly related to this thread unless your post was off topic in the first place? Do you understand now?
     
  2. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, what Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You pulled my quote entirely out of context to construct an irrelevance. Please return to the theme of this thread or take your nonsense elsewhere.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,985
    Likes Received:
    379
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you are the one who is claiming physics is a democracy and I take issue with that. Its a ridiculous strawman that you own. Do I need to quote it for you? Dont blame me for your diversions and dont expect me to be silent about your errors.
     
  4. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, please quote it because you are lying. I never stated that physics was a democracy, so you can quit the strawman bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

    I haven't made any errors and please keep to the topic. If you don't like the topic don't participate in the thread, and if you keep trolling you will be reported.
     
  5. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
  7. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, he doesn't have much of a clue regarding the subject.

    Scott, without a video, can you tell me why free-fall was exceeded at the 12 second mark in the collapse sequence for 2.25 seconds?
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Architects and engineers for 911 truth represent neither a majority nor do they represent architects or engineers.

    They are merely conspiracy buffs with a website.

    What you missed is that science and evidence proves all of their claims false.
    Shared beliefs of a few or many means nothing
     
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Listen to the experts.

    http://www1.ae911truth.org/news-sec...-and-building-7-on-911-by-david-chandler.html

    Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

    Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMEHc14IWf4

    The Death of Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko after Speaking about 9/11 WTC 7 Building 7
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
    (2:40:20 time mark)

    Building 7 - Sound Evidence for Explosions (10 min)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlRmaUCE8sM

    WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nonsense,you mean,and red herrings....
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are not nor has there ever been 2200 architects and engineers who have stated any such opinion as you claim or signed any petition.
     
  12. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    None of that infantile BS answered my question. So, no-one can explain why free-fall was exceeded for 2.25 seconds at the 12.5 second mark? This is important and 9/11 truth doesn't know why.
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,985
    Likes Received:
    379
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Its pretty tough to debate posers because they dont have enough subject matter familiarity to recognize when they have had their butts handed to them much less understand the engineering content in those video clips that destroys the official story!
     
  14. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are describing yourself as there is no evidence in these videos to support your delusions.
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Et Tu ,scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c?
     
  17. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    There could be many reasons for the demolition. Trying to get an accurate explanation for that is just a way to distract from what we're actually saying. That being that the official story is full of holes. Us not knowing the exact reasons isn't some sort of "gotcha" moment.

    Here's what we do know. The tenants for the building included the CIA, IRS, Department of Defense, Secret Service, and several financial institutions including the Securities and Exchange Commission which at that time happened to be ramping up their investigation into Enron and other companies. Beyond that, we can speculate all we want but there won't be any shortage of what you can come up with with this combination of tenants.

    And while some of you say that it would be easier to just delete files or to shred papers, look at what's happening to Hillary right now. Destroying the building ensures the destruction of any evidence of whatever may have been in there.

    One other thing of note. The WTC was a money loser because of the way the buildings were built. The new buildings are all glass exterior and heavily focussed on low energy consumption. Buildings 3-6 were all so badly damaged (note that none of them collapsed) that destroying building 7 would allow for the entire center to be rebuilt by Larry Silverstein who got all that insurance money. Not one of the 7 new buildings has a design like the old buildings. Before you jump down my throat, I'm not saying this one issue proves anything by itself, but it's worth keeping in mind. Silverstein's acquisition of the buildings and taking out an insurance policy covering terrorism just months before the attacks is awfully coincidental. And then fighting to get double the money because there were two attacks. And since we're talking building 7, there's that line of his where he says they "pulled it".

    If you want the science behind the collapse of the building, here's a great presentation from Architects and Engineers:

    9/11: Blueprint for Truth
    http://youtu.be/OQgVCj7q49o
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There investigation into Enron was not stopped or even slower down by 911. Having government offices in the wtc is meaningless.


    Silverstein's famous quite referred to the fire fighters and means nothing . " pull it " has never been a term used in demolitions.

    The video you link to is devoid of any scientific accuracy and has long been discussed and proven fiction in many of these threads.

    Twoofers consistently watch TV and think it teaches them science making them all einsteins.

    The twoofers videos are entertainment with as much evidence facts and science as a Tom and Jerry cartoon.

    Like all who claim that the official story is full of holes you absolutely FAIL to point out any such holes.
     
  19. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Really, dude? Devoid of scientific accuracy? Well ok then :roll:
     
  20. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes and proven so long ago.

    So where are these holes
     
  21. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    63
  22. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Proven by you? Yes, let's ignore the evidence brought forth by thousands of independent architects and engineers because Soupnazi proved to himself that the science is bogus.

    Watch the material and you'll see. I can't hold your hand.
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Evidently you're going to have to,I've watched scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c's videos as well as others ad nauseam and all I see is supposition,lies and appeals to authority...
    NOT 'holes'
     
  25. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are not and never has been thousands of such architects and engineers claiming what you describe.

    That material is very old and has been watched by me and many others repeatedly it has been proven fiction

    - - - Updated - - -

    No that is your repeated assertions which have no supporting evidence
     

Share This Page