Why are the Democrats opposed to the Bidens testifying?

Biden and the Dems are as dirty as the day is long. Upon examination of the facts, no honest person can deny that.

What I find amazing is that regular workaday people actually work and put effort into denying this.

As Americans, they are the ones being ripped off; yet, they abet, defend, and cheer for it.

It's truly bizarre.

 

You're missing a relation with reality.

 

What facts?

 

Nobody really cares about that, the important thing was hacking DNC and podesta emails and making the election about that, wrecking the election.

 

They do it because they do not hear the facts on their propaganda Network.

 

He just wanted Zelinski to SAY he was starting an investigation of Biden

 

So you have no problem with Biden taking your money, and leveraging it to squirm his drug addled, deadbeat son on to a $million/yr corporate board...

... and then further use your $$ as a carrot/threat to interfere in the internal legal system of another country to shield his kid and the most corrupt oligarch in the country from investigation??

You're okay with that??

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Start pulling on the Devon Archer thread and the corrupt Obama judge that overturned a jury's conviction in the fraud case against native Americans that involved Hunter Biden, Christopher Heinz (John Kerry's step son), and the corrupt Ukrainuan oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskyi as well as a Chinese firm that was receiving your tax $$$ courtesy of Biden and Kerry.

You like being lied to and ripped off so much that you attack the one guy who's trying to put a stop to it??

 

And of course you saw him do that in the phone call? It must be so, since that was what the whistleblower's report claimed.

 

They did not hack them, they claimed that their spam filters missed a phishing email, and supposedly both Podesta and someone at the DNC fell for it, and gave away their login info.

 

That's the part that should bother people. Of all the things that we could have leveraged with $1 billion in US foreign aid, to fight against corruption in Ukraine, and we blew it all on firing a prosecutor, who incidentally had only been the Prosecutor General for one year?????

 

Not sure where you find the documentation on this, but it must exist as it is consistent across the board in democratic positions.
Perhaps they call it something innocuous, but we call it the Democratic Double Standard. It exempts certain actions from blame or accountability according to it's association with party or political position.
It's being used almost universally, so you know it's not individual, it's SOP and somewhere is written in detail, like the 10 commandments in the bible.

 

Blew it all? The Prosecutor General is the KEY to fighting corruption. They are the head of the entire justice system, responsible for ensuring that corruption is both investigated AND prosecuted.

Without an honest General Prosecutor, NO ONE is going to be brought to justice for corruption, and corrupt players will be empowered and emboldened to continue their corrupt practices.

Shokin was quite the opposite - a CORRUPT Prosecutor General who blocked, sabotaged and shelved investigations, resulting in a grand total of ZERO prosecutions in his year.

How long do you think we should have waited before getting rid of him? And what would we be waiting for? A change of heart?

 

What part of he had only been in office for one year did you not read? The corruption in Ukraine did not begin and end with Shokin.

 

They do not want any of the Bidens to testify because existing evidence already indicates that one or several of the Bidens are corrupt and these Dems still think that Biden has a chance to win the Party's nomination and then beat Trump in a head-to-head political battle. Both of which are actually non-issues in reality, because the DNC has already decided that after they have finished generating the illusion that the primaries meant something they are going to give the word to their media political allies to re-discover how brilliant Elizabeth Warren is as a candidate. Biden was never anything other than for show, as is Bernie Sanders.

 

What ever miss the point much? so they took the emails they got and gave them to Fox news and 60% of political coverage with about emails. A total waste of time.

 

There is no evidence whatsoever the bidens are corrupt in any way. Ain't GOP propaganda exciting though?

 

Besides, all Trump has to do is show justification for why he sought to look into the firing of Shokin. He can demonstrate this by listing all the shady get rich deals, in Ukraine, China, etc... All of which have made Hunter Biden a multi-millionaire, as Joe leveraged his political power, influence and gravitas as an elected politician.

 

So let's not investigate them, so you can keep on saying that.

 

Yeah, they were dumb to fall for such an obvious scam. The FBI found that the RNC was also hit by the same type of phishing emails, but their spam filter caught them.

Wikileaks released the emails to everyone, not just to Fox News.

It all boils down to, if the Hilary and her DNC was not cheating in the debates, not trying to screw over Bernie Sanders, then their emails would have been boring. They got caught being corrupt, duplicitous, backstabbers.

 

Speaking of that:

How five members of Joe Biden’s family got rich through his connections

 

In corrupt states, the only people investigated and prosecuted are those who are either in the way of, or opponents of the ruling Oligarchy.

Shokin was beginning to investigate the corruption of Ihor Kolomoyskyi, the most powerful and corrupt oligarch in Ukraine.

Kolomoyskyi was involved in Burisma and in bed with the Bidens.

Shokin was fired; and viola, no more investigation into Burisma, Kolomoyskyi, or the Bidens.

Can you connect those dots??

 

Using the word "only" in this way ordinarily signifies that the time is considered short. So, if you weren't using the word in it's ordinary sense, what did you mean?

 

There is no evidence against either Biden as far as corruption goes. just a gigantic pile of innuendo and spin on the GOP propaganda machine and from its hypocrite politicians.

 

That was a brilliant idea for Schiff to put up video footage of President Skidmark saying how he would love to have all sorts of witnesses testify.