Why Did it Have to be... Guns??

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by 6Gunner, Sep 18, 2017.

  1. Dispondent

    Dispondent Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    34,260
    Likes Received:
    8,086
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sort of, the left wants a monopoly on force only when they have a monopoly on power, or at least a shred of it. When they are out of power they now favor anarchy and the continuation of decreasing the rights of citizens in both expression and protection. They will lose every time, nobody, even the full force of American law enforcement can disarm the American people. They know this so they seek greater and greater limitiation, even to the absurd, like limiting magazine sizes and such...
     
    6Gunner likes this.
  2. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wonder what the leftists would do if Trump used Antfia violence as a reason to, say, ban 'assault weapons'.
     
  3. Dispondent

    Dispondent Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    34,260
    Likes Received:
    8,086
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seeing as assault rifles having nothing to do with antifa, they'd probably stand behind him, and as soon as they got what they wanted they'd stab him in the back. People forget, Trump saw how liberals treated Christie, he's not half the fool liberals think he is. Look how that reaching across the aisle with Pelosi played out for her. Her own people now despise her as much as Trump...
     
  4. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well?
    Why do you think you would not be charged with and likely convicted of assault, attempted assault and/or attempted murder after assault them with your dog?
    Why would people no longer open carry because you assaulted someone with a dog?
     
    6Gunner likes this.
  5. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male






    Since the forum right wingers believe the 2d Amendment was designed to stop the government from terrorizing the populace it is time for them to take corrective actions against police criminals who terrorize innocent such as here:




    Witnesses yell 'he can't hear you' as Oklahoma City cops fatally shoot deaf man



    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-oklahoma-city-police-shooting-20170920-story.html



    [​IMG]





    Here is a decent, innocent, hard working man with no criminal record killed by police terrorists for no reason whatsoever.

    When are the forum right wingers going to take action and make those criminal cops pay for their crime?
     
  6. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you belive that citizens have the right to use armed force to stop the government from terrorizing the citizenry?
     
  7. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Jefferson openly said so. In principle, all conservatives should believe in it as well. But when challenged to back it up they run away.


    Just to make a point, I do believe that the people do have a right and have always supported the right of the Black Panthers when they attempted to do so. The forum right wing hypocrites refused to do so because they do not believe in principle.
     
  8. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not sure if you actually answered my question. Yes or no?
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  9. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male



    see the line Just to make a point, I do believe that the people do have a right and have always supported the right of the Black Panthers when they attempted to do so.
     
  10. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just wanted to make sure that I understood what you wrote.

    Have you taken up arms against these police? You enjoy that same right.

    How do you know this is truly tyranny, rather than a crime or crimes?

    Has due process been invoked? I would think that violence might be the last resort rather than the first. YMMV.
     
  11. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    Being half blind such a right wouldn't do me much good. But there are plenty of members of the far right here who always criticize government abuses but are too cowardly to do anything except to spam this board with hate and treason.


    Tyranny? Crime? Remember the Las Vegas and Portland situations where right wingers called it tyranny. There is no difference between those and Ferguson and what happened to that innocent deaf guy. It is tyranny and terrorism. Let's have the forum right wingers do something about it.
     
  12. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cops committing crimes can be solved without violence, can't they? I know you're dying to make this very important point about tyranny and the 2nd Amendment, but what you are calling tyranny may not meet the defintion, or the level, that requires or even suggests violence against the government.

    You can claim there is no difference, but that doesn't make it true. I realize that you may be physically unable to shoot a cop, but would you be willing to carry sandwiches and bandages for your posse? Would you be willing to stand in the line of fire to take a bullet for a comrade to leave them alive to resist that "tyranny" you so oppose?
     

Share This Page