Why did Larry Silverstein admit to designing the new WTC7 in 2000?

Discussion in '9/11' started by SamSkwamch, Mar 19, 2016.

  1. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who's out of their mind, truther? And I don't care what you are. Come on, Poe, you think you talk you angels 'n (*)(*)(*)(*). Why should anyone give you any credence? Well, a truther would, but they're not the brightest.

    Bob should distance himself from you as you are NOT helping his argument. You're exposing the movement as a refuge for crazies (I already knew that, but 9/11 truth try to hide it as a rule).

    'Sane' truthers try to distance themselves from no-planers and nuke nutters, but now they have guys who talk to angels to strengthen their cause.

    Hilarious!
     
  2. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    " truther crank " Ya, right, some people have very obvious bias.

    <'Sane' truthers try to distance themselves from no-planers and nuke nutters> more totally biased stuff .....

    Why is it that "truthers" are the subject of such discrimination? What have we done except to question the official story of 9/11?
    is it a crime to not believe everything that the mainstream media puts out?
     
  3. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And some people qualify for the description. ;)

    I can link you to truther sites that claim no-planers are disinformation agents, if I could be bothered.

    Because their liberal use of libel has no foundation in truth.

    1). 9/11 truth continually libel individuals, organisations and academics without evidence.

    2). 9/11 truth intentionally misrepresent evidence to support their irrational claims (e.g. Chandler).

    3). 9/11 truth deliberately avoid producing papers to be subject to peer review.

    4). 9/11 truth mendaciously misrepresent testimony and FAIL to confirm their claims. (cf, the fire fighters testimony that is abused by truthers)

    No, it is actively encouraged. You are falsely placing the responsibility for the accepted version on the shoulders of the media when it has little to do with them. It is this form of misrepresentation that goes toward supporting my case.
     

Share This Page