Why does everyone hate the white nationalist cause?

stop changing the subject.

you seem to be doing that a lot today.

 

You're admitting you're KKK then. Thought so.

 

My political beliefs are a direct result of my ancestry.

So?

 

Actually the source doesn't say that at all. Did you even read it?

 

we've known this for years

 

Nah, that would be another failure in logic for you.

 

it says "Jewish politicians Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:"

and then lists chuck schumer and liz holtzman.

it also claims that some AG authored the Hart-Celler Amendment, which is also false.

 

KKK and nazi are pimples on the butt of the world.

 

So if your political beliefs are because of your ancestry, and you care about your political beliefs, why aren't you advocating on behalf of your ancestry? Why are you going around the forum with left-wing talking points like "there is only one race, the human race"? You have no shortage of left-wing intellectuals to cite for that talking point, of course, but would they agree that your political beliefs are related to ancestry? Specifically European ancestry?

 

Am I on the "not kosher" list?

 

What do expect from nazi and KKK - lies and distortions - always.

 

The source does not list Chuck Schumer and Liz Holtzman as being behind the Open Immigration law of 1965. There were 4 names listed there, and those two are not included. Click the link and see for yourself. Stop embarrassing yourself. You're supposed to be the smartest group ever. Act like it.

 

i cant tell you which list you are on without violating forum rules

 

so you posted a fake quote?

thats your problem, not mine

 

I bet you call a lot of people those things.

 

Is that a threat, Ron?

 

I'm not responsible for your obvious and repeated errors. If you click the link you can clearly see that Schumer and Holtzman are not on the list.

 

Only the worst of the worst. Congratulations.

 

But I don't identify with either of those labels you ascribed to me. How could such a smart guy like you make such obvious mistakes?

By the way, you have no idea how big of a compliment that is. I am proud to be so far removed from someone like you that I evoke disgust. That means I'm a good person, on the right path.

 

You mean even the KKK and nazi wouldn't take you? I guess I can believe that.

 

By the way, you have no idea how big of a compliment that is. I am proud to be so far removed from someone like you that I evoke disgust. That means I'm a good person, on the right path.

 

I am. I just corrected ronstar's attempt to deny the predominately Germanic origins of America. And whenever the opportunity presents itself, I highlight the important role that Germanic tribal customs played in the emergence of western civilization as we know it. I have also discussed repeatedly the role that English northern Yankees have played in the attempted destruction of southern Celtic political society. However, I also recognize and acknowledge the ability of nominally "black" people to adopt my Germanic culture in the form of the English language, individual liberty, market economics, and political decentralization. For whatever reason, you see that as inconsistent.

It's not a left-wing talking point. It's just a fact. Humans belong to the same species and there is no biological basis for separating them into races. However, separating them into different cultures or ethnicities can, under certain conditions, be rationalized.

 

And the fact that 98% of blacks don't agree with you on those things isn't an indication that "hey, maybe they aren't really like me, after all?".

Of course there's a biological base. White people and East Asians have Neanderthal DNA and sub-Saharan Africans have none. They have found enough genetic difference in the Neanderthal to separate it as a separate species of human, and some humans alive today have this as part of their ancestry and genetic makeup, while others don't. The same can be said with Denisovans, a cousin of the Neanderthal. Only Southeast Asians have this DNA in them.

But let's say you were right and that race was simply a "social construct" that had no biological element, so what? Language is a social construct too yet nobody would say all languages are the same. They're instantly identifiable as different the instant you hear them, just like race is when you see it. The language you speak is apparently so important that it becomes one of your standard metrics when you evaluate if someone was your ally or not, so why would race not be?

 

It's self explanatory.

 

Buncha liberal nonsense.

Walls of text don't make you right, smart, or correct in the slightest.

The races are genetically different it has been proven over and over again. Race has been an issue since the first time 2 different looking humans saw each other.

If all humans are the same, then why is Africa, the "cradle of human life" still a 4th world hell hole with slavery, tribalism, and savages living in mud huts?

White cultures built societies and cities and infrastructure hundreds of years ago, so did the Asians, what's african negros excuse if not genetic inferiority?

/thread