Why don't liberals express same outrage over millions of murdered babies each year?

The hypocrisy of Democrats is absolutely stunning. They fake outrage and sympathy over the murders of those precious children in CT while at the same time promoting the murder of millions of babies each year through abortion. The overwhelming majority of those murdered babies were minorities as well. As a proud Hispanic, this is just sickening to me.

 

They don't care about people until they are out of the womb apparently.

Pretty sad that they would have supported the abortion of any of these children killed in the school yet now its wrong to them.

 

How about the outrage of $1.5 billion dollars wasted by Romney on his own personal bid for power and world dominance?

How about the other $1.5 billion spent by The Blue Team to combat the power grab by the usurper Romney?

Imagine how many poor this $3 billion could feed cloth and house?

That's truly an outrage.

 

Abortion is acceptable, murder is not.

 

There is simply nothing in the Constitution about unborn infants.

It is clear that the Founding Freemasons were not thinking about va ginas or vu lvas during their deliberation, or if they were they were not speaking or writing about it.

The only federal law on point is the USSC ruling in Roe v. Wade.

 

Why ? Because they don't care. End of story.

 

Grats, glad you've the dictatorship your happy with. Now wheres thats govt official to help me across the road?

 

You really need something in writing before you consider it wrong?

Yep, you are a liberal.

Point still stands. You would have supported each of these precious children being aborted but now that they are gunned down a few years later you throw a fit.

You do not find that hypocritical?

Apparently you only consider the murder of a child as bad when it happens at a certain time.

Sickening.

 

You have a point ... why woud anyone bring a zygote into this world to become a beautiful Kindergartner just to be executed by a mentally-ill mans' 2nd Admendment Rights ?

I often wondered about that when Bush sent everyones' beautiful child to be executed in Iraq.

 

Crazy thought, I know. But maybe they do not consider a fetus an actual person?

I mean, just because they are for one thing, does not mean they are for the other, especially when the two are not really related to each other.

 

I would like you to hold one of those shot up little corpses in your arms and tell me it wasn't a person the day it was conceived.

 

Not the same situation.

Just to be clear. I am not always pro-choice. I believe you shouldn't be having sex with someone unless you really love them, and that you should be aware, and responsible, for the consequences of having sex. I do not believe people should be having abortions unless it is a situation where the health of the mother could be affected, rape was involved, or the parents cannot afford to take care of the children and cannot arrange for other options such as foster care.

However, this feeling does not have anything to do with how I feel about small children being shot up. I feel this was a real tragedy and should not have happened. I really want us to review our gun laws to see if changes need to be made.

Understand?

 

Babies are inconvenient to liberal voters.

 

The hypocrisy of Republicans is absolutely stunning. They profess outrage at losing their gun rights and ignore the deaths of living children in favour of clumps of cells.

 

can a sperm cell die, of course it can, is it murder... of course not... but yet it's the potential start of a human... but only if the sperm cell is taken to term, otherwise it's just a dead sperm

we all have different idea's of when life starts, thus until science can complete a pregnancy to term outside the womb, the decision will continue to be with the one risking their life to bring the pregnancy term

If a God wants a baby to be born, it will be right, if not in one womb.. then in another... right?

.

 

There was already a troll thread on this yesterday

http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...es-die-every-day-america-who-mourns-them.html

 

Oh puleaze...not even close...nice try though...

 

Once there is a conclusive scientific consensus that life begins at fertilization, then I will accept abortion as morally wrong.

 

Yeah it's acceptable, because abortion affects mostly:
(1) Women
(2) Blacks and Hispanics

why should they be concerned?

 

True dat is for all liberals. There would be even more fake outrage if this were a black or hispanic inner city school as opposed to a mostly white school in an affluent are of CT. Liberals are so disgusting.

 

The weakness from this post wreaks all the way to Paradise Valley in Montana.

No wonder your state is a bankrupt laughing stock

 

Fetuses aren't children. Your lack of logic is stunning.

 

What murdered babies are you talking about?

Oh you are talking about abortion.

No- not murder. Not babies.

 

Then why have I been hearing so much lately about the Royal Baby...Big news, the princess is pregnant with the royal baby!!! does the media have it wrong?, does the royal family have it all wrong? does the NY times have it wrong?, why are they not calling it the royal fetus...or the royal zygote? OOH OOH! I know because they want to keep it, so now its a baby...got it. I wonder if they where to go in for the royal ultrasound and found out that the baby was severely deformed, with spina bifida, no arms, and cerebral paulsy, if the headlines would read...The royal fetus has been aborted, due to medical necesity the royal zygote has been royaly aborted and flushed down the royal toilet bowl...just sayin'