WIKILEAKS BOMBSHELL: Hillary Advisors Admit She “HATES EVERYDAY AMERICANS”

So you don't think she lied to anyone other than being untruthful about the sniper fire thing. You don't think she mishandled classified or sensitive material? You don't think she mistreated any of the women that either accused her husband or were having a relationship with her husband? you don't believe any of the stories that she mistreats those working for her in the secret service? Basically, you even think the media is out to get her too? you don't believe she used her position in regards to pay to play?

Wow

Well, sadly, we may end up with her and we all should pray YOU are right.

 

It's a reference to you too. She hates you, according to her confidant. As long as you are happy with that. I maybe have one person I've hated. I wouldn't look out for them or try to help them.

 

There's been some significant things uncovered about Hillary's campaign from the wikileaks released emails.. this is not one off them. The email refers to her hating the phrase everyday Americans, hence the followup line "but I think we should use it" and then again after that where it says "I think if she doesn't say it once, people will notice"

I mean.. duh

 

There is no relationship the crap you are putting out and the truth.

 

Again, any accusations that HRC has lied to anyone else have either had no evidence to back them up or if they do proffer evidence it is dubious or unverifiable.

Anyone who has handled classified information for any length of time has mishandled it at one time or another. The point is not whether or not information was mishandled but whether or not is was purposefully done and what damage if any was caused by it. Again there is no evidence and after a long investigation has been cleared of any wrongdoing.

Again, all the accusations that HRC has done anything to publicly smear Bill Clinton accusers has no evidence to back it up. The only evidence proffered to date is a book written by one of the accusers who has been proven to lie about the event in the past and lie under oath. The book is published by a publishing house owned by website known to lie about the Clinton's on a daily basis. It has 0 credibility.

The fact that she mistreats people who work for is dubious at best. There is an immense amount of he said, she said and very little evidence. There is evidence to support the fact that she is an extremely tough boss to work for and that she holds people that work for her accountable. That to me is a good trait to have in a President.

Again, all the accusations that HRC has run a pay to play campaign through the Clinton foundation have little to no proof to substantiate them. Any proof proffered to date is at best dubious and can be explained away quite easily.

On the pay for play front I find the accusations against the Trump foundation to be far more damning than those against the Clinton foundation.

 

lol...OH NOES!

I don't need Clinton to like me or help me. I need her to continue President Obama's agenda. I need her to appoint a very Progressive SC judge. I need her to continue to push a Progressive agenda. Those things she do which is her worth to me.

I don't need her help beyond that and I certainly don't care if she likes me.

Although she didn't write the email, the "normal voters" Podesta was probably referring to is uneducated trump supporters...and frankly, not liking you is extremely kind. I think far, far worse about your ilk.

 

Yes, Clinton, like the rest of the corrupt political class is very anti-American.

 

Heaven help us. His policies are disaster. Looks like you right about uniformed voters

- - - Updated - - -

These parties are more like fraternities . All they care about is staying a member and whats good for them. The hell with whats good for the nation

 

Let's see. She hasn't met a war she didn't like, she hates you, she is for globalist banking which hurts you, she is for tripling the number of Syrians even after admitting they will be letting in terrorists, she is for flooding the country of anyone from Mexico and all you are worried about is locker room talk about sex? Figures, must be a Hillary supporter.

 

lol, my "ilk"? Gotcha.

 

Hillary's policies are no better. Democrats have given up on growth and her tax policies prove that.

 

About the "emails" themselves:

I asked someone just yesterday about the 'validity' of the email 'data' itself. Specifically, how does anyone know that Wikileaks emails are not altered/edited by someone?

People would be wise to be skeptical on all ends of this stuff.

 

That would be easy to prove. It has never happened for a reason.

 

They are worse

 

The Wikileaks purloined Emails of Podesta in this case by Assange are real, showing exactly what Hillary thinks of Americans. To claim they are 'crap' is complete fantasy on your part. Just as the statements by James Comey stating that Hillary did send and receive classified information on her home brewed server. Denial is not a river in Egypt..

 

Except Hillary and her entourage consistently mishandled highly classified information. Anyone else would be serving time in a federal prison as has been proven time and again.

 

So while people of the Left are denying and throwing fits that Hillary hates American people in general, they say nothing about the mocking and attacks on Catholics, Evangelicals and Latinos, etc.

 

More Chats with Podesta via Email.... I've high lighted the important items. Even people working for HRC question her reasoning.

Source: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7432


Re: New Clinton emails



From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: brentbbi@webtv.net
Date: 2016-01-01 20:01
Subject: Re: New Clinton emails






Sid is lost in his own web of conspiracies. I pay zero attention to what he says.

On Friday, January 1, 2016, Brent Budowsky <brentbbi@webtv.net> wrote:

> John, assume I wrote a thousand words about this. It is disquieting that
> when HRC was secretary of state she spent a good time of time doing gossip
> emails with Sid Blumenthal about various matters, the ubiquitous Lanny
> Davis shilling for himself in pathetic ways, and Neera Tanden gossiping
> about what Soros thinks of Obama. At least Tanden I regard as a serious
> person. Sid and Lanny I do not by standards of a secretary of state or
> potential president.
>
> I was not in touch with you at the time of the healthcare debate, but what
> Sid suggests does not strike me as your style. I was in very regular and
> close touch with Daschle at the time, and he would never have said to the
> press what Sid suggests, and since I am in the press I know those were not
> his views. I guarantee that based on direct personal knowledge of Tom's
> views and actions at the time. Blumenthal did not have the slightest idea
> of what he was talking about in his girlie gossip with the secretary of
> state about this. Why she places such great stock over so much time in
> these exchanges with Blumenthal is mystifying to me---and frankly
> troublesome.
>
> This whole subject, to use vernacular, gives me the creeps. Secretaries
> of state, presidential candidates and presidents should not be spending
> their time on this kind of minor league stuff.
>
> Sent from my iPad

 

Haha wait, wait wait.

Let's say for the sake of this argument that it's true, and she hates Americans.

Why the F would that be deserving of a vote from everyday hard working Americans?

How brainwashed are you?

-Anti- Trumpster here so don't deflect

 

I don't really care is she thinks this or not. Most people in the top 10% of the population think they are incredible gods anyway, so this isn't anything new. Finding a highly ambitious, accomplished individual who isn't contemptuous of average people is like finding a needle in a haystack.

It just comes with the territory. Humans like to distinguish themselves, and when they do, they develop contempt for those they perceive as less than they are. I think this is unavoidable and present in any potential candidate for the presidency. Hillary went to Yale, has lived in the white house, been a senator, the Secretary of State, and will unfortunately be the next president.

Does anyone think she considers herself one of us? The same is obviously true of Donald, maybe to an even greater extent.

The point is that this isn't a valid point of attack, assuming it isn't taken out of context, which seems to be likely.

 

You don't care that Hillary hates "every day Americans"?
That is, she hates you?
Why do you not care?

 

If it is easy to prove, then please explain it.

And BTW, what has "...never happened..."?

 

The onus would be one you to prove your conspiracy theory

 

No, not really.

It would hardly be logical to assume that emails from a hacked source and likely handled by a nation hostile to the U.S.A., should be trusted 'implicitly'.

Now, if someone shows me that any such data has been verified/corroborated etc., then I'll look at it differently. Until then, I think it is fair to be skeptical of the content of the same.

 

If he'd really done it he wouldn't go round talking about it, it's just locker banter like he said..
His women accusers are only coming out of the woodwork now with trumped-up stories because they can smell money at the end of it..