Will Hillary Clinton Be Charged With Perjury?

The leftists certainly don't seem concerned about 'divisiveness'.

 

The Republicans control the Senate and the House....but maybe not for long. Yes, it's a marginal domination, but the Senate Majority leader and Speaker have a lot power. If the Democrats take over, it will also be a marginal domination, but I suspect there will be a lot of RWers putting the blame on them for legislation.

 

No they don't control the Senate. They have a slim numerical majority but it takes 60 votes to pass anything.

 

Let's remember this when the Democrats control 51% of everything.

 

The Republicans had no problem passing Obama's choices for Cabinet positions whereas it is said it will take nine years to fill every necessary position if the Democrats continue their obstructionist policies.

 

Nor rightwingers. We're playing a dangerous game in this country by demonizing Americans who disagree with us.

 

If you list the divisiveness created by Republicans I'll do one on Democrats, okay?

 

But you don't get to define the order f importance.

And there is courtroom evidence of guilt?

That's been tried but without success. The Democrats will always find a 'dossier' somewhere, whether it's truthful or not. They are never deterred by anything which might be 'salacious and unverified', just as we also saw with Ronnie Jackson.

 

The point would be?

 

Yeah, it's a free country. Dupes are free to focus on any ol' dumbass thing.

Of course. His companies have gone bankrupt numerous times.

So what? You think we should select an unemployed coal miner with a Grade Six education?

Now, you're whining.

You don't know if what was reported about Jackson is true or not. It would have been easy enough to check out the claims.

 

The point would be apropos of your comment that, "Nor rightwingers. We're playing a dangerous game in this country by demonizing Americans who disagree with us".

 

Going bankrupt is not illegal. You've been misinformed.

Have you been told by the Montana Senator is and "unemployed coal miner with a Grade Six education?" If so you have been misinformed yet again.

Whining?? About what? It seem you cannot speak the truth nor deal with it.

In fact they have been checked out.

 

Ah, you want to play games by pretending rightwingers aren't demonizing liberals.

Go find someone dumb enough to follow you down the rabbit hole.

 

I said he's a crook who stiffed people, not that bankruptcy is illegal.

You're the guy who doesn't want to hire someone who has managed an HMO.

Trump should have appointed someone better qualified. He screwed up--again.

 

Of course that wasn't even the question but I never really expected you to respond to this very minor challenge.

 

You said he was a crook. Prove it.

You're being 'less than candid' again.

Left wing scum will continue to lie, fabricate and do their best to besmirch the reputation of very good people, in this case an honorable man and his family.. This is worse than McCarthyism ever was.
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-officials-praise-white-house-doctor-trump-physical-2018-1

 

You should look internally as you accuse me and others for exactly what you do. Your response is poor and typical of you. Attack, demonize, ad hominem, deflection etc.

Think for yourself. I don't particularly like him as an independent but you can't deny his successes.

 

There is no proof they were hacked as they refused to allow the FBI to investigate.

Comey needed to be fired.

Trump should fire or relieve the top two at DOJ and give the case back to the FBI. Only one sitting President has been subpoenaed an that was Jefferson in the Aaron Burr treason trial. He ignored it. Nixon has a subpoena dumas for documents not him. Clinton reached an agreement to withdraw his subpoena and go bad advice. Trump should be quiet and let his surrogates make the case about the unconstitutionality of the appointment of a special counsel (there is no crime) and the constitutionality of a subpoena and indictment. There is no need for an interview other than a perjury trap. He can't indict the President.

I would ignore any subpoena. That avoids the need for pleading the fifth and possibly being given immunity and forcing him to testify.

Collusion is not a crime and there is no evidence of Russian influence. This 'investigation' is over.

 

They can't stop the FBI from investigating. You made that up. I understand they did refuse to allow FBI access to their servers.

The best evidence is clearly that someone, even if it was an inside job, caused the emails to be released without DNC permission, ergo a crime was committed.

If he does, even if he doesn't undermine his Presidency, he will delegitimize any process that exonerates him. Why would he want that after more than a year of everyone agreeing there is no evidence Trump did anything wrong?

If he wants the issue to die down (and I'm not sure he does), he should say calmly he's innocent and that the investigation should continue.

What's your point?

Hallelujah! Maybe the country can discuss important issues.

Why should we care what Trump decides?

Trump has a political and legal decision to make. He'll make it.

No, clearly the investigation isn't over. Let it run its course.

 

"There are none so blind as those who will not see."

 

What is the evidence the DNC was hacked and why would they refuse to allow the FBI to investigate?
It's a witch hunt and there was no crime alleged, therefore, the investigation is unlawful. There must be a crime alleged and there wasn't. That's why Sessions, the DDDOJ, and Mueller should be relieved of their duties. Even the Judiciary is on their butt.
He has said he was innocent. But that won't stop the investigation which is hurting the country.
Only one sitting President has been subpoenaed and he refused to comply and the reason was it was unconstitutional. Trump can ignore it.
The investigation isn't over, true. But it should never have started. It is unlawful and unconstitutional.

 

The special counsel is unlawful so no I don't see any reason to not oppose it.
I know they are unrelated because the indictments have nothing to do with Russia AND the Trump campaign. Get you head out of it.
You're biased so much you can't discuss it rationally.

 

Mark Taylor is certainly predicting some pretty amazing things.

 

Hillary will not be charged because the media will try to spin it as Trump being vengeful in order to protect the democrat's legacy