without echoing NASA's statement, how would you defend this landing on the moon.

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by polscie, Mar 15, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,197
    Likes Received:
    812
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. NightSwimmer

    NightSwimmer New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,548
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Why should anyone bother? You've already told us what you believe. Beliefs are not altered by the presentation of contradictory evidence. That's why they are called "beliefs".
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do you keep bringing up the Chinese spacewalk?

    It has NOTHING to do with the moon
     
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,288
    Likes Received:
    847
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're being deliberately obtuse. You know that it's an objectivity test. The anomalies in the Chinese spacewalk that prove it was faked are too clear to obfuscate. NASA's official position is that the Chinese spacewalk was real. Anyone who's seen the anomalies and maintains that it was real is either a shill who has to agree with NASA, or a moron. Not only does BetaMax maintain that it was real, he also tried to obfuscate the anomalies.
    http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com.es/2011/07/chinese-spacewalks-part-2.html

    This means he's not a serious poster because he obviously doesn't even believe his own arguments. He's shown that he's capable of doctoring videos so we have to wonder about everything he posts as his gifs and videos probably contain doctored footage and pictures. Once someone's credibility is gone, what's the point of even debating with him?
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    the 'anomolies' in the spacewalk were debris from inside their capsule,and in no way indicate any fakery involved,that said,AGAIN it has nothing to do with the moon landing.

    And I don't consider myself or anyone else who has a working brain a 'moron' because we don't swallow your bogus spam about the moon landing(s)

    You make a habit of posting the same old spam every time,even when your info is corrected,such as your continued claim that the laser ranging retroflector being made in france,despite being shown otherwise

    Betamax's credibility in this Isn't the one that's gone,Scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c......YOURS however,in this matter IS.
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,994
    Likes Received:
    3,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean like your credibility is gone so you refuse to debate anyone.

    Anomolies prove nothing and he did not obfuscate he proved your anomolies are not what you claim they are.

    NASA was correct the chinese space walk was real and you cannot prove a speck of evidence to the contrary
     
  7. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,197
    Likes Received:
    812
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it isn't. When a fool makes a claim and is unable to prove it, then uses their simplistic understanding as a means to judge others, it amounts to hogwash.

    The bubble to a rationale intelligent person is nothing more than a sublimating piece of ice. I have asked you numerous times to explain how the object becomes so much bigger with what amounts to 1-2 metres of change in supposed depth.

    Like the coward you are, you cannot answer this.

    Your other spam claim is basically you having zero understanding of the behaviour of a tether in a vacuum. Because it looks odd to you, your brain is simply unable to get past this. It is shape memory and thermodynamic influence. The inside of the cable is also likely to have trapped air, so the external vacuum is also going to move it through pressure differences.

    And any reasonably intelligent person, not swayed by idiotic conspiracy crap.

    There are no anomalies, only people who aren't sufficiently educated blowing air out of their backsides think there are.

    The ludicrous objectivity test that comes from a pro-Apollo person. I explained why there are no anomalies. The bubble is such a stupid claim, when it is highlighted properly, it takes a deeply entrenched fool to deny it is simply a piece of ice.

    Bovine excrement. I believe my own arguments and find yours idiotic.

    Prove it! Another claim from your backside, where you lack even the basic skills to create a simple video proving your case.

    Who is this "we". My gifs and videos are 100% legitimate, unaltered and bury your stupid claims. That is why you refuse to answer them.

    You never had any credibility, debating you is a waste of time. I refuse to let you leave your spam trail unanswered, so that other easily led people will be taken in by it. Stop spamming your off topic rubbish and answer my post!

    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=347184&page=13&p=1064237064#post1064237064
     
  8. Gorn Captain

    Gorn Captain Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35,580
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Scott, do you believe that men have orbited the Earth.....yes or no?
     

Share This Page