If Trump hadn't been in the running, GOP Partiers, who gets your mark? I'll check back. (I'll vote.... Even though I be no R )
Republicans in Congress will votes for new president if not current D.J. Trump after this summer don't going for war in NK. And I hope on Jeb Bush if not war will happens. Current D.J. Trump only chance to proof his role as United leader. Or he dies about two year and Pence taken replacement in White house and meeting Mendelson or Warren or MacMillan next elections.
Jeb Bush for runner up ?? He replace D.J. Trump in next january some last point should happens or in the year 2017.
Before Trump I supported Scott Walker, but I knew that no Republican was going to win in 2016...and then came Trump. So none of these guys would have been President, whether there was a Trump in the race or not.
I'll research Ole's submissions..... Just to make sure no coded messages are contained, but interesting so far.
See? The two parties are actively harming our country by the quality of the candidates they cough up for elections time and again. Something is rotten in our system. Competent, qualified people who better represent the majority of us (rather than the wealthy few and the DC power structure) can't get in. People want the option to vote for a Libertarian or a Green or an independent, but they just don't have it because these people, these platforms, have no voice in our system. It took celebrity bigmouth Trump to create an exception to that, and in just one of the two parties.
And the Congregation says, AMEN. Actually, the D's showed how twisted they are, with their own party, with Sanders.
Agree completely. First way to combat this is to force the Presidential Debate Committee to allow any candidate that has a mathematical opportunity, no matter how long of a shot, to reach 270 to be allowed on the stage. The use of polls is a self perpetuating model and thats why they work so hard to preserve it.
Now it's the Trump but if republican in Congress votes Jeb Bush he are new seat in White house as precentialy nomination 2017.
I certainly agree that there is a problem where the debate committee is concerned. It's not under public control and its rules are whatever it decides internally. Why should that have control over our electoral process the way it does now? Kind of like how it is with the two parties themselves, again internally rather than publicly controlled, although in their case it's more forgivable. Overall, though, I think that private interests have too much control over the process.
I don't even want to think what would have happened if Ted Cruz was in the white house. But then again I really don't want to even think about Hillary having won an election much less the one for the highest office of the land. But If not for Trump we would likely have a president Ted Cruz right now.
I voted for Kasich in this poll, but I voted for Rubio in the NH primary. I think without Trump it would have come down to Kasich versus Rubio, and Kasich would have won more Midwest states than Rubio.
I say moron, because you all nominated the brother of a man who lied about the Iraq War, nearly crashed our economy and was very divisive, but hey if you all want to go there, please be my guest. Even my conservative relatives don't want anymore Bushes.
Cruz was the only one I felt was worse than Trump. Just watching Cruz made my skin crawl and want a shower. I am convinced a DNA test would reveal Cruz is a reptile, or possibly an insect.